Development of student worksheets with contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to train critical thinking skills responsibility of students on thermochemistry concepts
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i3.3452Published:
2022-05-10Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 3 (2022): May 2022Keywords:
Student Worksheet, CTL, Critical Thinking, Responsibility, ThermochemistryArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to produce and describe the feasibility of student worksheets with a contextual teaching and learning CTL approach in training critical thinking skills and responsibility in thermochemical material. This study uses a research and development type, the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The research sample was 24 students of class XI IPA MA Nurut Taqwa Grujugan Cermee Bondowoso, West Java, Indonesia. The results showed that: 1) Validity analysis obtained an average percentage of 87% with very valid criteria; 2) Practical analysis based on the percentage of response questionnaires and student activity observations of 88% and 98% with very practical criteria; 3) Analysis of effectiveness based on pretest-posttest data: a) Normality test of cognitive knowledge and critical thinking skills 0.985 and 0.297 normally distributed; b) Paired Sample t-Test 0.000 showed an increase in learning outcomes; c) The N-Gain test of cognitive knowledge and critical thinking skills scored 78% and 76% showed an increase in learning outcomes and attitude of respondents obtained a score of 87% with very good criteria. IN conclusion, the developed student worksheet with the CTL approach is categorized as feasible with valid, practical, and effective criteria. The development of student worksheets as teaching material to improve students' critical thinking skills becomes a choice for learning to make learning more meaningful, accompanied by the attitude of students who are full of responsibility, which is an important thing to do.
References
Majid, A. (2011). Perencanaan pembelajaran mengembangkan kompetensi guru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muawiyah, D., Yamtinah, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018, September). Higher education 4.0: assessment on environmental chemistry course in blended learning design. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012058). IOP Publishing.
Keenan, C. W., Kleinfelter, D. C., & Wood, J. H. (1984). Kimia untuk universitas.
Ennis, R. H. (1987). Critical thinking and the curriculum. Thinking skills instruction: Concepts and techniques, 40-48.
Sulistyowarni, P. A. D., Prahani, B. K., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Jatmiko, B. (2019, February). The effectiveness of OR-IPA teaching model to improve students’ critical thinking skills on senior high school physics subject. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 3, p. 032011). IOP Publishing.
Cañas, A. J., Reiska, P., & Mollits, A. (2017). Developing higher-order thinking skills with concept mapping: A case of pedagogic frailty. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 9(3), 348-365.
Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif.
Shanti, W. N., Sholihah, D. A., & Abdullah, A. A. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis melalui ctl. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(1).
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21: Kunci sukses implementasi kurikulum 2013.
Suryani, N. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran sejarah berbasis it. Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya, 10(2), 186-196.
Negeri, Q. G. S., & Tengah, C. K. J. (2017). Upaya Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VII C SMP Negeri 1 Cawas, Klaten Melalui Metode CTL Pada Materi Konsep Organisasi Kehidupan Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017. Teknis, 12(1).
Sugiharti, G., & Muliaman, A. (2016). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa yang Diajar Dengan Menggunakan Model Contextual Teaching And Learning dan Guided Inquiry pada Pokok Bahasan Struktur Atom. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(1), 5-11.
Fitriah, U. N. (2017). LKPD Berorientasi Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 6(2).
Pertiwi, W. J., Solfarina, S., & Langitasari, I. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Etnosains Pada Konsep Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2717-2730
Parandika, R. W., Muhtarom, M., & Sutrisno, S. (2019). Analisis Karakter Disiplin dan Tanggung Jawab Siswa pada Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas XI SMK Palebon Semarang. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(6), 364-372.
Indriani, A. D. N. (2014). Upaya Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab dan Prestasi Belajar Ips Melalui Metode Outdoor Study Siswa Kelas Iv Sekolah Dasar Negeri 1 Sidabowa (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO).
Setyowati, Y. (2012). Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Tanggung Jawab Belajar Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika (Pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Sragen Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2013). A model for the systematic design of instruction. Instructional Design: International Perspectives: Theory, Research, and Models, 1, 361-370.
Sudiana, N. (1989). Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar. PT Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Riduwan, M. B. A. (2007). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Alf. Bandung.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.
Fatimah, F. M., & Anggrisia, N. F. (2019). The effectiveness of 7e learning model to improve scientific literacy. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 277, 18-22.
Trianto, M. P. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. Corwin Press.
Nugraheny, D. C. (2018). Penerapan lembar kerja peserta didik (LKPD) berbasis life skills untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses dan sikap ilmiah. Visipena, 9(1), 94-114.
Hakim, A. R., Hairunisa, H., Makasih, M., & Haris, A. (2020). Pengembangan LKS Berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Pada Pembelajaran IPA di SDN Sakuru. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(2), 94-101.
Nurfidayanti, H. N., & Yonata, B. (2022). Development of student worksheets based on guided inquiries to train students science process skills on reaction rate materials. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(1), 8-15.
Ihsan, M. S., Ramdani, A., & Hadisaputra, S. (2019). Pengembangan E-Learning pada pembelajaran kimia untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 14(2), 84-87.
Ennis, R. (1997). Incorporating critical thinking in the curriculum: An introduction to some basic issues. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the disciplines, 16(3), 1-9.
Simangunsong, N. S. D. (2012). Pengaruh model pembelajaran contextual teaching and learning (CTL) terhadap hasil belajar kimia pada pokok bahasan sistem koloid kelas xi sma methodist lubuk pakam TA. 2011/2012 (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED).
Ulfa, D. (2014). Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab Belajar dengan Layanan Konseling Individual Berbasis Self Management Pada Siswa Kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Pemalang Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Semarang: Fakultas Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Author Biographies
Sitti Kholifah Amartyah, Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Rusmini Rusmini, Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sitti Amartyah, Rusmini Rusmini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
