Strategi Peningkatan Hasil PISA Level 2 Berbasis Analisis Kesalahan Change and Relationships Siswa SMP
DOI:
10.29303/jm.v8i1.11095Published:
2026-03-17Downloads
Abstract
Indonesian students' mathematical literacy in PISA assessments remains low,particularly in the Change and Relationships content area. Most existing studies are quantitative and therefore have not revealed the cognitive processes underlying student errors. This study aims to analyze errors and problem-solving strategies of eighth-grade students in solving PISA Change and Relationships Level 2 problems using the PISA mathematical literacy framework (formulate–employ–interpret). A qualitative case study approach was employed,involving 15 eighth-grade students from SMP Al Wildan Islamic School 22 Makassar. The test instrument consisted of three PISA Level 2 tasks with contexts of goods pricing, intravenous drip rate,and currency exchange. Six students were selected through purposive sampling for in-depth interviews. Data were collected through diagnostic tests, semi-structured interviews,and documentation of student work,then analyzed using source triangulation. Results show that average answer accuracy is only 44.4%,with three consistently identified error categories: representation and modeling errors at the formulate stage, procedural errors at the employ stage,and absent result verification habits at the interpret stage. Successful students demonstrate relational understanding and strong metacognitive awareness. This study contributes a specific error mapping per PISA mathematical literacy stage for Change and Relationships Level 2 content,along with operationally distinct intervention recommendations for each error category
Keywords:
Mathematical Literacy Change and Relationships PISA Error Analysis Formulate–Employ–InterpretReferences
Abdullah, A. H., Rahman, S. N. S. A., Mokhtar, M., Hairon, S. M., Ibrahim, N. H., & Mun, S. H. (2018). Behaviours of Students When Solving the Assessment of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Mathematical Problems. 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2018.8626932
Alagumalai, S., & Buchdahl, N. (2021). PISA 2012: Examining the influence of prior knowledge, time-on-task, school-level effects on achievements in mathematical literacy processes – Interpret, employ and formulate. Australian Journal of Education, 65(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211031674
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Fadlila, N., Hayuningrat, S., & Wijaya, A. (2023). Developing mathematics PISA-like problems using change and relationship content. 030018. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141064
Febrianti, P., & Nurjanah, N. (2022). Kesulitan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA 2021. Transformasi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 6(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v6i1.1664
Hasanah, M., & Hakim, D. L. (2022). Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Pada Soal Matematika PISA Konten Quantity dan Konten Change and Relationship. Juring (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 5(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v5i2.13785
Jayantika, I. G. A. T., & Namur, G. (2022). Peran Teknologi Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Digital Matematika. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 3(2), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7033331
Jensen, S., Gasteiger, H., & Bruns, J. (2024). Place Value and Regrouping as Helpful Constructs to Diagnose Difficulties in Understanding the Place Value System. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 45(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-024-00234-8
Masfufah, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa melalui Soal PISA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10.
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (Eds). (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Niss, M., & Jablonka, E. (2020). Mathematical Literacy. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 548–553). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100
Nurinayah, I. N., & Nur, I. R. D. (2023). ANALISIS Literasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Konten Change and Relationship. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika (JES-MAT), 9(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v9i2.7864
OECD. (2019, December 3). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en.html
OECD. (2023). PISA Result 2022 (Volume I) The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en/full-report/the-state-of-learning-and-equity-in-education-in-2022_e65c570e.html
Putra, K. D. P., Wibawa, K. A., & Noviantari, P. S. (2024). Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Konten Change And Relationship. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1211
Rahma P, F. L., & Reflina, R. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Programme For International Student Assessment (PISA). Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.26714/jkpm.10.1.2023.11-20
Rowdlotul Jannah, R. N., & Wijayanti, P. (2021). Analisis Strategi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2896–2910. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.767
Rum, A. M., & Juandi, D. (2022). Students’ Difficulties in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problem Level 3, Level 4 and Level 5. International Society for Technology, Education, and Science. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED630992
Sampe, N., & Samsuddin, A. F. (2024). Kemampuan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Konten Change and Relationship. Pedagogy: Journal of Multidisciplinary Education, 1(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.61220/pedagogy.v1i2.250
Satiti, W. S., -, I., & Khotimah, K. (2021). Soal Matematika Model PISA Konten Change and Relationships untuk Menunjang Literasi Matematis Peserta Didik. Exact Papers in Compilation (EPiC), 3(4), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.32764/epic.v3i4.554
Selan, M., Daniel, F., & Babys, U. (2020). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa konten change and relationship. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v11i2.6256
Skemp, R. (2006). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Relational-Understanding-and-Instrumental-Skemp/075ab39ff23c191c898e175e1d2c0d9d6357a33f
Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (Eds). (2015). Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7
Tienken, C. H. (2020). PISA Scores and Ranks Are Fundamentally Flawed. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 56(2), 55–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2020.1729629
Veronika, S., & Liliana, S. (2025). Analisis Peran Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Perspektif Guru dan Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 976–985. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v9i2.4156
Wijaya, A., Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Husriani Husain, St. Nur Khalifah Ali, Abdul Rahman, Bernard Bernard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
