Analisis Kognitif Siswa Berdasarkan Kerangka Formulate Employ Interpret pada Soal PISA Level 4
DOI:
10.29303/jm.v8i1.11101Published:
2026-03-31Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyze students’ difficulties in solving PISA Level 4 equivalent mathematical literacy tasks based on the Formulate, Employ, and Interpret (FEI) processes and to identify scaffolding implications at each stage. A descriptive design with quantitative and qualitative approaches was employed involving 28 ninth-grade junior high school students who worked on four PISA Level 4 equivalent tasks. Quantitative analysis was used to map students’ achievement profiles across the FEI processes, while qualitative analysis examined selected students’ written solution traces. The results indicate that students’ difficulties were most prominent at the formulate stage, as reflected in incomplete mathematical representations, although some students were able to carry out procedures (employ) and obtain correct final answers. Procedural errors and conceptual misconceptions persisted at the employ stage, whereas at the interpret stage students tended to stop at numerical results without adequately relating them to the problem context. These findings suggest that the FEI processes are interconnected and conceptually hierarchical, although they are not always explicitly articulated in students’ written responses, and provide a basis for future action-oriented research aimed at improving instruction and students’ performance in PISA assessments.
Keywords:
mathematical literacy PISA Level 4 formulate employ interpret scaffoldingReferences
Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: introduction and review. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8
Brower, R. L., Woods, C. S., Jones, T. B., Park, T. J., Hu, S., Tandberg, D. A., Nix, A. N., Rahming, S. G., & Martindale, S. K. (2018). Scaffolding Mathematics Remediation for Academically At-Risk Students Following Developmental Education Reform in Florida. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 42(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1279089
Dewi, W. K. D., & Nuraeni, R. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy pada Materi Perbandingan di Desa Karangpawitan. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i1.1093
Farida, R. N., Qohar, A., & Rahardjo, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMA Kelas X Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe Pisa Konten Change and Relationship. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2802–2815. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.972
Golla, E., & Reyes, A. (2022). Pisa 2022 Mathematics Framework (Draft). OECD Publishing, November 2018, 32–39. https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/files/PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework Draft.pdf
Hamidy, A., & Jailani, J. (2019). Kemampuan proses matematis siswa Kalimantan Timur dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika model PISA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26679
Hein, K., & Prediger, S. (2024). Scaffolds for seeing, using, and articulating logical structures in proofs: Design research study with high school students. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 74(January 2023), 101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101123
Li, R., Cao, Y., Tang, H., & Kaiser, G. (2024). Teachers’ Scaffolding Behavior and Visual Perception During Cooperative Learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10379-6
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results. In Factsheets: Vol. I. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137/
Puspita, F., Eva, Z. N., & Tusi, F. A. (2023). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Journal GEEJ, 7(2), 40–48. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/GAMMA-NC/article/view/12950
Qadry, I. K., Dassa, A., & Aynul, N. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Konten Space And Shape Pada Kelas IX SMP Negeri 13 Makassar. Jurnal Matematika Dan Aplikasinya (IJMA), 2(2), 78–92. file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/99-Article Text-488-1-10-20220309.pdf
Rachmah, F., Widadah, S., & Ayuningtyas, N. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Model Pisa: Formulate Dan Employ. JEDMA Jurnal Edukasi Matematika, 3(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.51836/jedma.v3i2.496
Rezat, S., Malik, S., & Leifeld, M. (2022). Scaffolding Close Reading of Mathematical Text in Pre-service Primary Teacher Education at the Tertiary Level: Design and Evaluation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10309-y
Safitri, L., Darmawan, P., & Prayekti, N. (2019). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Himpunan. 160–170.
Sun, L., Kangas, M., Ruokamo, H., & Siklander, S. (2023). A systematic literature review of teacher scaffolding in game-based learning in primary education. Educational Research Review, 40(May), 100546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100546
Supartik, S., & Pasaribu, L. H. (2021). Increasing Students’ Communication Skills and Independence Through Realistic Mathematics Learning Assisted by Google Classroom. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(01), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i01.12373
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Husnul Khotimah, Mulianah Mulianah, Abdul Rahman, Bernard Bernard

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




