Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edisi Maret
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran terhadap Pemahaman Siswa Kelas 7 SMP

Authors

Argulana Candra Hariyanto , Isbadar Nursit , Fadhila Kartika Sari , Dyah Werdiningsih

DOI:

10.29303/jm.v8i1.11487

Published:

2026-03-26

Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model on students’ mathematics achievement. The study is motivated by the need for instructional approaches that connect mathematical concepts to real-life contexts in order to enhance students’ understanding and engagement. A quantitative approach was employed using a quasi-experimental design with a pretest–posttest control group. The participants consisted of two classes: an experimental group taught using CTL and a control group taught using conventional instruction, with 30 students in each group. The research instrument was a mathematics achievement test scored on a 0–100 scale, administered as both a pretest and a posttest. Data were analyzed using prerequisite tests (normality and homogeneity) followed by an independent-samples t-test at a 0.05 significance level. The results indicate a statistically significant difference in posttest mathematics achievement between students who learned through CTL and those who received conventional instruction. These findings suggest that CTL is more effective in supporting students’ conceptual understanding and their ability to apply mathematical ideas through meaningful, context-based learning activities. Therefore, CTL is recommended as an alternative instructional model to improve students’ mathematics learning outcomes.

Keywords:

Contextual teaching and learning Mathematics achievement Contextual instruction Quasi-experimental design

References

Alemdag, E. (2022). Effects of instructor-present videos on learning, cognitive load, motivation, and social presence: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12713–12742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11154-w

Besser, M., Hagena, M., & Kleickmann, T. (2024). On the added value of considering effects of generic and subject-specific instructional quality on students’ achievements – an exploratory study on the example of implementing formative assessment in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56, 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01562-2

Breit, M., Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2025). Mathematics achievement and learner characteristics: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 118, 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102621

Brodie, K. (2025). Theorising context in mathematics teaching and teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 28, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-025-09627-4

Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2023). A systematic review on video-based learning in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 19–50.

Cortez, E., Osenar-Rosqueta, R., & Prudente, M. (2023). A cooperative-flipped classroom under online modality: Effects on mathematics achievement, perceived learning, and attitudes. International Journal of Educational Research, 119, 102160.

Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Effect of flipped classroom learning approach on mathematics achievement and interest of students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 20921–20949.

Elkjær, M., & Jankvist, U. T. (2021). Designing tasks for a dynamic online environment: Applying research on lower secondary students’ difficulties with equation solving. Mathematics, 9(5), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9050557

Güler, M., Kokoç, M., & Bütüner, S. Ö. (2023). Does a flipped classroom model work in mathematics education? A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 17511–17552.

Hwang, S., Han, J., Muirhead, F., Brown, A., Melville, M., & Cai, J. (2025). Textbooks as a resource for teaching mathematics through problem posing: Catalyzing instructional change. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 57, 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01694-z

Lin, J., & Yu, Z. (2024). Effects of instructional video technologies in classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 5437–5465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10382-7

Mu, J., Bayrak, A., & Ufer, S. (2022). Conceptualizing and measuring instructional quality in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 994739. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.994739

Polat, H. (2023). Instructors’ presence in instructional videos: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 8537–8569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11532-4

Ran, H., Kim, N. J., & Secada, W. G. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effects of technology's functions and roles on students' mathematics achievement in K–12 classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12611

Rubel, L. H., & McCloskey, A. V. (2021). Contextualization of mathematics: Which and whose world? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10041-4

Schoenherr, J., Strohmaier, A. R., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Learning with visualizations helps: A meta-analysis of visualization interventions in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 45, 100639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100639

Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165, 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132

Spooner, M. M., Nomani, S., & Cook, C. (2024). Investigating the use of contextual tasks in an introductory college algebra course. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 43(1), 38–50.

Tesfaw, A. A., Worku, B. F., Delyas, H., & Yitagesu, D. (2024). Context-based problem-posing and solving instructional approach: How does it enhance students’ engagement, learning, and data handling performance? Cogent Education, 11(1), 2389486. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2389486

Veith, B., Amado, N., Carreira, S., & Jones, K. (2023). An overview of algebra research in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1171115. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1171115

Wirth, L., & Greefrath, G. (2024). Working with an instructional video on mathematical modeling: Upper-secondary students’ perceived advantages and challenges. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01546-2

Zhang, T., Zhang, Y., Shi, L., Jing, X., & Shen, X. (2024). The effects of mathematical problem posing interventions on improving students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101587

Author Biographies

Argulana Candra Hariyanto, Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Islam Malang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Isbadar Nursit, Universitas Islam Malang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Author

Fadhila Kartika Sari, Universitas Islam Malang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Dyah Werdiningsih, Universitas Islam Malang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Hariyanto, A. C., Nursit, I., Kartika Sari, F., & Werdiningsih, D. (2026). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran terhadap Pemahaman Siswa Kelas 7 SMP. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 8(1), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v8i1.11487

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.