Pengaruh Layanan Bimbingan Belajar Terhadap Kepercayaan Diri dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa
DOI:
10.29303/jm.v8i3.12206Published:
2026-09-30Downloads
Abstract
This research aims to know the effect of tutoring service on students' self-confidence and mathematics learning achievement. This research uses a quantitative approach with a causal-comparative method (ex post facto). The population is all grade 9 students. The sample uses saturation sample of 51 students (17 students in the tutoring group and 34 students in the non-tutoring group). The instruments are a self-confidence questionnaire with 17 items and a mathematics achievement test. The test has four essay questions about the volume of prisms and pyramids, and probability. The data analysis uses the independent sample t-test. The results show that tutoring service has a significant effect on self-confidence (p = 0.000; average: tutoring = 56.235 [82.70%], non-tutoring = 47.294 [69.55%]; effect size d = 1.934, large category). Also, tutoring service has a significant effect on mathematics learning achievement (p = 0.037; average: tutoring = 76.941 [76.94%], non-tutoring = 61.880 [61.88%]; effect size d = 0.651, medium category). In conclusion, tutoring service affects students' self-confidence and mathematics learning achievement.
Keywords:
tutoring service; self-confidence; mathematics learning achievement; SMPIT Anak Sholeh; ex post facto tutoring service self-confidence mathematics learning achievement SMPIT Anak Sholeh Mataram ex post factoReferences
Amin, A., & Suardiman, S. P. (2016). Perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar dan model pembelajaran. 4(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v4i1.7688
Baidowi, Wahidaturrahmi, Kertiyani, N. M. I., & Wulandari, N. P. (2024). Statistika dasar teori dan praktik. Pusat Pengembangan dan penelitian Indonesia.
Cohen, J. (1988). Stastistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 3, Issue 1). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harefa, D. (2023). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jejak.
Ibrahim, A., Alang, A. H., Madi, Baharuddin, Ahmad, M. A., & Darmawati. (2018). Metodologi penelitian. Gunadarma Ilmu.
Kusumawati, I., Lestari, N. C., Sihombing, C., Purnawanti, F., Soemarsono, D. W. P., Kamadi, L., Latuheru, R. V., & Hanafi, S. (2023). Pengantar pendidikan. CV Rey Media Grafika.
Manalu, J. B., Sitohang, P., & Turnip, N. H. H. (2022). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran kurikulum merdeka belajar. Mahesa Research Center, 1(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34007/ppd.v1i1.174
Nasution, H. F. (2021). Peningkatan hasil belajar Matematika melalui bimbingan belajar gratis. Indonesian Journal Of Community Service, 1(1), 66–73.
Nasution, H. S., & Abdillah. (2019). Bimbingan dan konseling “konsep, teori dan aplikasinya.” Lembaga Peduli Pengembangan Pendidikan Indonesia.
Puspitawati, R. J., Faridah, L., & Aini, K. N. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal hots ditinjau dari kecerdasan logis matematis. INSPIRAMATIKA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 16–26.
Ramadhani, R., & Bina, N. S. (2021). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Kencana.
Ramayulis. (2015). Dasar-dasar kependidikan: suatu pengantar ilmu pendidikan. Kalam Mulia.
Roflin, E., Liberty, I. A., & Pariyana. (2021). Populasi, sampel, variabel dalam penelitian kedokteran. PT. Nasya Expanding Management.
Slameto. (2015). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.
Sopiah, A. D., & Sriharini, S. (2023). Urgensitas kepercayaan diri terhadap pendidik. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(5), 1810–1817. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i5.915
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pahima Pahima, Arjudin Arjudin, Ulfa Lu'luilmaknun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
