Konstruksi Instrumen Analisis Muatan Penalaran Matematis pada Buku Teks Matematika
DOI:
10.29303/jm.v8i3.12467Published:
2026-08-10Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to construct an analysis instrument for deductive and inductive reasoning content in mathematics textbooks. This study uses a mix-method approach with the following stages: 1) preliminary study; 2) design and review of the test instrument; 3) testing the test instrument. The validity of the instrument was tested through expert judgment involving 2 mathematics education lecturers. Reliability was tested through intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Intra-rater reliability was through repeated analysis by the researcher with an interval of 2 weeks, while inter-rater reliability involved 3 mathematics teachers. The construction of the reasoning analysis instrument for mathematics textbooks contains 2 aspects, namely inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning, each consisting of 4 indicators, which were declared valid and suitable for use after revision. The results of intra-rater reliability showed a high level of reliability and several indicators achieved perfect reliability and the results of inter-rater reliability have met a good level of agreement between the researcher and the rater. Thus, the developed instrument is considered valid and reliable for analyzing the content of deductive and inductive reasoning in mathematics textbooks.
Keywords:
deductive reasoning inductive reasoning mathematics textbooks validity reliabilityReferences
Akker, J. V. (2010). Building Bridges: How Research May Improve Curriculum Policies and Classroom Practices. CIDREE, 175-195.
Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2010). Mathematics Educators Views on the Role of Mathematics Learning in Developing Deductive Reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 1131-1154.
Boateng, G., Neilands, T., Frongillo, E., Melgar-Quiñonez, H., & L. Young1,5, S. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 1-18.
Cole, R. (2024). Inter-Rater Reliability Methods in Qualitative Case Study Research. Sociological Methods & Research, 53 (4), 1944-1975.
De Vet, H., B. Terwee, C., Mokkink, L., & L. Knol, D. (2011). Chapter 5 : Reliability. In H. C. De Vet, C. B. B. Terwee, L. B. Mokkink, & D. L. L. Knol, Practical Guides to Biostatistic and Epidemiology Measurement in Medicine (pp. 96-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dockx, J., Bellens, K., & Fraine, B. D. (2020). Do Textbooks Matter for Reading Comprehension? A Study in Flemish Primary Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 1-19.
Harel, G., & Weber, K. (2020). Deductive Reasoning in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham : Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 183-189.
Jeanotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A Conceptual Model of Mathematics Reasoning for School Mathematics. Educ Stud Math 96, 1-16.
Jia, W., & Zhang, P. (2023). Rater Cognitive Processes in Integrated Writing Tasks: from the Perspective of Problem Solving. Language Testing in Asia, 1-20.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: an Introduction to Its Methodology. United States of America: Sage Publications.
Lamprianou, I., Tsagari, D., & Kyriakou, N. (2023). Experienced but Detached from Reality: Theorizing and Operationalizing the Relationship Between Experience and Rater Effects. Assessing Writing, 56.
Marx, R., Menezes, A., Horovitz, L., Jones, E., & Warren, R. (2003). A Comparison of Two Time Intervals for Test-Retest Reliability of Health Status Instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 730-735.
Marzi, G., Balzano, M., & Marchiori, D. (2024). K-Alpha Calculator–Krippendorff's Alpha Calculator: A user-friendly tool for computing Krippendorff's Alpha inter-rater reliability coefficient. MethodsX, 12.
Moguel, L. E., Landa, E. A., & Cabanas-Sanchez, G. (2019). Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14 (3), 563-581.
Morris, A. (2002). Mathematical Reasoning: Adults' Ability to Make the Inductive-Deductive Distinction. Cognition and Instruction, 79-118.
NCTM. (2004). CSSU Math Framework . United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nguyen, R., Brooks, M., Bruno, R., & Peacock, A. (2018). Behavioral Measures of State Impulsivity and Their Psychometric Properties: A Systematic Review. Personality and Individual Differences, 67-79.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework (Draft). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Otten, S., & Gilbertson, N. J. (2014). The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(1), 51-79.
PSKP Kemendikbud. (2022). Risalah Kebijakan Nomor 11, Oktober 2022 Mengatasi Masalah Penyediaan Buku Teks Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Pusat Standar dan Kebijakan Kurikulum (PSKP).
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, & Psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Sukendra, I. K., & Atmaja, I. K. (2020). Instrumen Penelitian. Bali: Mahameru Press.
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & John, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to Learn Reasoning and Proof in High School Mathematics Textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253-295.
Ulfah, A. A., Kartono, & Susilaningsih, E. (2020). Validity of Content and Reliability of Inter-Rater Instruments Assessing Ability of Problem Solving. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 1, 1-7.
Utari, T., & Hartono. (2019). Muatan Penalaran dan Pembuktian Matematis Pada Buku teks SMA Kelas X Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1-13.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L., Wolfe, R., Schmidt, W., & Houang, R. (2002). According to the Book Using TIMSS to Invistigate the Translation of Policy Into Practive Through the World of Textbooks. New York: Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Wyse, A. (2021). How Days Between Tests Impacts Alternate Forms Reliability in Computerized Adaptive Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 644-667.
Zhang, D., & Qi, C. (2019). Reasoning and Proof in Eight-Grade Mathematics Textbooks in China. International Journal Educational Research, 98, 77-90.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Caesarla Elintang Yolawati, Raden Rosnawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
