Pengembangan E-modul Interaktif Berbasis Problem-Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Matematika
DOI:
10.29303/jm.v8i3.13258Published:
2026-09-29Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to develop and describe an interactive e-module based on the Problem-Based Learning model for eighth-grade students’ mathematical literacy in the topic of straight-line equations, meeting the criteria of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This research and development study employed the ADDIE model, consisting of Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The subjects were 30 eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 16 Yogyakarta. The instruments included validation sheets, a lesson implementation observation sheet, practicality questionnaires for teachers and students, and a mathematical literacy test. The results showed that the e-module applied the Problem-Based Learning syntax, integrated digital platforms, and supported students’ mathematical literacy. The e-module was valid, with scores of 69 from the material expert and 102 from the media expert. It was practical, with scores of 85 from the teacher, 69.86 from students, and 94.92% for lesson implementation. The e-module was also effective based on Hotelling’s T² test, one-sample t-test, proportion test, and N-Gain analysis. The e-module can serve as an alternative technology-based instructional material for teaching straight-line equations and supporting students’ mathematical literacy.
Keywords:
interactive e-module problem-based learning mathematical literacy equation of a straight lineReferences
Afni, N., & Hartono. (2020). Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) as a strategy to improve students mathematical literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012043
Akker, J. Van Den, Bannan, B., Kelly, A. E., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766
Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. In Teaching for Student Learning: Becoming an Accomplished Teacher. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866771
Branch, Maribe, R., & Varank, I. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York : Springer.
Chen, X., Zhou, J., Wang, J., Wang, D., Liu, J., Shi, D., Yang, D., & Pan, Q. (2022). Visualizing Status, Hotspots, and Future Trends in Mathematical Literacy Research via Knowledge Graph. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113842
Dorimana, A., Uworwabayeho, A., & Nizeyimana, G. (2022). Enhancing Upper Secondary Learners ’ Problem - solving Abilities using Problem-based Learning in Mathematics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 235–252.
Fauzi, I., Chano, J., & Wu, C. C. (2025). Mathematical Literacy of Indonesian Elementary School Students: A Case Study of Bandung School. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n2p58
Ge, W. L., Zhu, X. Y., Lin, J. B., Jiang, J. J., Li, T., Lu, Y. F., Mi, Y. F., & Tung, T. H. (2025). Critical thinking and clinical skills by problem-based learning educational methods : an umbrella systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06951-z
Hafiz, M., Darhim, & Dahlan, J. A. (2020). Comparison of mathematical literacy enhancement between students with problem-based learning and guided discovery learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032075
Huda, N., & Khotimah, N. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 5(02), 27–32. https://ejurnal.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnalmathema/article/view/3528
Husni, N., & Herman, T. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Ability on High-Level Problem Of PISA viewed from Gender. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 5(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v5i3.771
Irfan, L., JAILANI, J., & Susanti, D. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dan Self-Efficacy Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 2142. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i3.5117
Jahangiri, J., Oxman, V., & Stupel, M. (2022). Testing the NCTM 2020 Standards Using Rigorous Mathematics and Multiple Solutions to a Single Geometric Problem. Resonance, 27(6), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-022-1397-z
Julianto, Nur, Rejekiningsih, T., & Akhyar, M. (2021). Analysis of students’ logical thinking skill in solving mathematical literacy based on ethnomathematics in primary school. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, 1–6.
Kaiser, G., & Willander, T. (2005). Development of mathematical literacy: Results of an empirical study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 24(2–3), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hri016
Muhaimin, L. H., Sholikhakh, R. A., Yulianti, S., Ardani, Hendriyanto, A., & Sahara, S. (2024). Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404
Mutmainah, S., & Kartika, H. (2024). Junior High School Students ’ Mathematics Problem-Solving Ability Us- ing the Problem-Based Learning Model : A Systematic Review. 3(February), 28–36.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.
Nurmasari, L., Budiyono, Nurkamto, J., & Ramli, M. (2022). Mathematical Literacy Profile of Primary School Students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2566(November). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0116799
OECD. (2018). Education at a Glance 2018 (Summary in French). https://doi.org/10.1787/5faf22e4-fr
OECD. (2023). Pisa 2022 Results. In Factsheets: Vol. I. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137/
P21. (2019). Partnership for 21st Century Learning A Network of Battelle For Kids Frameworks for 21st Century Learing Definitions. Framework For21" Century Learning, 1–9. https://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf
Rahayu, A. H. R. N., Hardianto, D., & Rijal, B. S. (2025). Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Interaktif untuk Meningkatkan Minat dan Kemandirian Belajar Informatika di SMK Negeri 1 Pajangan. 10(2), 1343–1349.
Setiawati, S., Tatang, H., & Jupri, A. (2020). Analysis of Indonesian Students’ Error in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problems Based on PISA 2015 Results. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 21(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v21i1.pp67-77 Received:
Stacey. (2015). The International Assessment of Mathematical Literacy: PISA 2012 Framework and Items. Springer : Switxerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_43
Widoyoko, E. P. (2017). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar.
Yustitia, V., Kusmaharti, D., Wijayanti, S., & Faridah, L. (2024). Mathematical literacy of students with low abilities: A case study of elementary school students. AIP Publishing LLC, 3046(1).
Zulkarnain, I., Hidayanto, T., & Kamaliyah. (2021). Students mathematical literacy in solving wetlands contextual problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012044
License
Copyright (c) 2026 elsa fahira, Agus Maman Abadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
