Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient
Published:
2023-06-21Downloads
Abstract
The aim of this study is to describe the analysis of students’ critical thinking skills from the Adversity Quotient on the mathematical system of linear equations of two variables. The type of this study is qualitative descriptive. The subjects were 28 students of class VIIIA SMPS Mimbar Budi Manufui. The instruments used were test and subject interviews. Subject interview selected 3 students with details of students of the climber type 1 student of the camper type and quiter type students. The data analysis used were tests, interviews and documents. The results of this study indicate that the type climber students are capable fulfill all indicators of students’ critical thinking to interpret, to analyze, to evaluate and to explore. While the camper students type is able to interpret, to analyze, to evaluate but they can not infer. The other result shows that quitter students just can be interpret, analyze, but they can not evaluate and infer.
Keywords:
Students’ Critical Thinking Adversity QuotientReferences
Astiantari, I., Pambudi, D. S., Oktavianingtyas, E., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematik, 11(2), 1270–1281.
Fardani, Z., & Surya, E. (2013). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk membangun karakter bangsa. At-Ta’dib, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v8i1.511
Gaffar, A., Mahmud, R. S., Satriani, S., Halim, S. N. H., & Marup, M. (2021). Proses berpikir matematika siswa tipe climber dan tipe camper berdasarkan langkah bransford stein. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v10i2.3254
Gunadwan, A. W. (2004). Genius Learning Strategy. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Haryani, D. (2011). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pemecahan Masalah untuk Menumbuhkembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa (pp. 121–126).
Hidayat, W., & Sari, V. T. A. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan adversity quotient siswa SMP. Jurnal Elemen, 5(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i2.1454
Irianti, N. P., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa Quitter dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah SPLDV Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v1i2.582
Kurniawati, D., & Ekayanti, A. (2020). Pentingnya berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 107–114.
Laja, Y. P. W., & Simarmata, J. E. (2022). Pengaruh kecemasan matematika terhadap persiapan tes UTBK siswa SMAN 1 Kefamenanu. Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA), 4(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol4iss2year2022page58-64
Mardika, F., & Insani, S. U. (2017). Adversity quotientand student’s problem solving skill in mathematics. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science(4thICRIEMS). Retrieved from retrievedfromhttp://seminar.uny.ac.id/icriems/sites/seminar.uny.ac.id.icriems/files/prosiding2017/ME04 Fitria Mardika.pdf
NCTM. (2000). Principle and Standars For School Mathematics. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
Leonard, L., & Amanah, N. (2017). Pengaruh adversity quotient (AQ) dan kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.281.7
Ningrum, I, A. (2017). Analisis tingkat berpikir kreatif matematis peserta didik ditinjau dari adversity quotient kelas VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Bandar Lampung tahun ajaran 2016/2017. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan, Lampung.
Ningrum, E. (2016). Pengembangan sumber daya manusia bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Geografi Gea, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v9i1.1681
Purwananti, Y. S. (2016). Peningkatan kualitas pendidikan sebagai pencetak sumber daya manusia handal. In Proceedings International Seminar FoE (Faculty of Education) (pp. 220–229).
Rachmantika, A. R. & Wardono. (2019). Peran kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran matematika dengan pemecahan masalah. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 2, p. 441).
Seery, M. D., Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (2010). Whatever does not kill us: cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability and resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 1025–1041.
Stoltz, P, G. (2004). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Supardi U.S., S. U. S. (2015). Pengaruh adversity qoutient terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i1.112
Supriadi, Anwar, Z., Hidayani, & Rusani, I. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika menggunakan langkah-langkah polya ditinjau dari adversity quotient tipe campers. Celebes Education Review, 3(1), 25–33.
Syafitri, E., Armanto, D., & Rahmadani, E. (2021). Aksiologi kemampuan berpikir kritis. Journal of Science and Social Research, 4307(3), 320–325. Retrieved from http://jurnal.goretanpena.com/index.php/JSSR
Taufik, A., Rahman, A., & Talib, A. (2019). Description of Thinking Process in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Brandsford And Stein’s Stages Reviewed from Adversity Quotient. Retrieved from http://eprints.unm.ac.id/id/eprint/13064
Wahyu, T. D. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Langkah Polya Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) Tipe Quitter Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Kelas VIIIE SMPN 22 Kota Jambi. Universitas Jambi.
Wilson, V. (2000). Educational forum on Teaching Thinking Skills. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rosalinda Selan, Oktovianus Mamoh, Yosepha Patricia Wua Laja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
