Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa
DOI:
10.29303/jm.v6i2.7855Published:
2024-10-26Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to describe the adaptive reasoning skill of students in solving mathematical problems based on the artisan, idealists, guardian and rational personality types. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research type. The subjects of this research were 29 students in class VIIID of SMP Negeri 2 Labuapi for the 2024/2025 academic year. The interview subjects were 8 consistin, of 2 students with artisan personality type, 2 students with idealists personality type, 2 students with guardian personality type, and 2 students with rational personality type. The instruments used were personality type questionnaires, adaptive reasoning skill tests and interviews. The results of the analysis and discussion in this study indicate that students with artisan personality type have high adaptive reasoning skill, meeting five indicators of adaptive reasoning skill, namely making conjectures, providing reasons for answers, finding patterns, checking the truth of an argument, and drawing conclusions. Students with idealists’ personality type have high adaptive reasoning ability, meeting three indicators of adaptive reasoning skill, namely making conjectures, providing reasons for answers, and drawing conclusions. Students with guardian personality type have low adaptive reasoning skill and cannot meet the five indicators of adaptive reasoning skill. Students with rational personality type have moderate adaptive reasoning skill, meeting one indicator of adaptive reasoning skill, namely providing reasons for answers.
Keywords:
Reasoning Adaptive Reasoning Adaptive Reasoning Skill Problem Solving Personality TypeReferences
Alwisol. (2018). Psikologi Kepribadian (Edisi Revisi). Malang: UMM Press.
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Erikson, E. H. (1989). Identitas dan Siklus Hidup Manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia.
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).
Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Papers Universitas Siliwangi, 562–599.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_97.
Herman, T., Akbar, A., Alman, Laely, Farokhah, Febriandi, R., Zahra, F. R., Febriani, W. D., Kurino,
Y. D., & Abidin, Z. (2023). Kecakapan Abad 21: Literasi Matematis, Berpikir Matematis, dan
Berpikir Komputasi. Bandung: Indonesia Emas Group.
Hidayati, W. S., & Nuraini, E. M. (2023). Analisis Proses Pemecahan Masalah Matematika
Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian. 38-48.
Keirsey, D. (1998). Please Understand Me II: Temprament, Character, Intelligence. California:
Prometheus Nemesis Book Company.
Khaerunnisa, E., Pujiastusi, H., & Laksana, W., I. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis
Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Matematis dan Tipe Kepribadian. Jurnal Matematika dan
Pendidikan Matematika, 5(4), 276-283.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001) Adding it Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Maya, N. (2019). Analisis Tipe Kepribadian Siswa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kemampuan
Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Menggunakan Model Problem Based Learning. Journal of
Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 3(1), 2548-2297.
Mulyani, E., Ratnaningsih, N., & Sirri, E. L. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Peserta Didik dalam
Menyelesaikan Soal Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian.
Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 2(1), 44-56.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. California: Sage Publications.
NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM
Nursit, I., Abidin, Z., & Mufidah, W. I. H. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah
Matematis Peserta Didik Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Artisan. Journal Formatif, 16(1), 1-8.
Permana, N. N., Setiani, A., & Nurcahyono, N. A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif
Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots). Jurnal Pengembangan
Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.14421/jppm.
Puspanda, R. D., Sujiran., & Riawan., I. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah
Matematika pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa. Journal of
Education Research, 2(3), 13-24.
Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Rachmawati, F. & Lestari, K. E. (2023). Hubungan antara Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif dan Self
Directed Learning. Jurnal Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 305-313.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Syarifuddin, M. (2022). Bahasa, Pikiran, dan Kebudayaan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 4(4),
-513.
Turmuzi, M. (2016). Evaluasi Proses dan Hasil Belajar Matematika. Mataram: FKIP - Pendidikan
Matematika Universitas Mataram.
TIMSS (2015). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. Boston: Lynch School of Education.
Wahyuni, Djam’an, N., & Talib, A. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika
Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Dimensi Myer Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Jurusan
Matematika FMIPA universitas Negeri Makassar, 1-9.
Zuraidah. (2022). Analisis Literasi Matematis Keislaman Mahasiswa Tadris Matematika Ditinjau
dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 906-917.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lisa Katun Nada, Nyoman Sridana, Nourma Pramestie Wulandari, Laila Hayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
