Analysis of Student Perceptions of Project-Based Learning: A Case Study in Experimental Physics Course

Authors

Sutrio Sutrio , Gunawan Gunawan , Hikmawati Hikmawati , Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati , Ahmad Busyairi , Padia Haslinda , Ahmad Hardyan Isnaini

DOI:

10.29303/jpft.v11i2.11002

Published:

2025-12-31

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): July - December

Keywords:

Experimental Physics, Project-Based Learning, student perception, Problem Solving, Learning Styles

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Sutrio, S., Gunawan, G., Hikmawati, H., Verawati, N. N. S. P., Busyairi, A., Haslinda, P., & Isnaini, A. H. (2025). Analysis of Student Perceptions of Project-Based Learning: A Case Study in Experimental Physics Course. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 11(2), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v11i2.11002

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

The urgency of this research lies in the critical need to understand the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) within the context of the Experimental Physics course, particularly in responding to modern curricular demands that emphasize problem-solving and creativity. This study aims to analyze student perceptions of PjBL implementation, covering learning style profiles, learning experiences, challenges, support systems, and the impact on problem-solving abilities. Utilizing a quantitative approach with a descriptive design, data were collected through surveys administered to students enrolled in the Experimental Physics course. The results indicate that the majority of students (65.7%) possess a Kinesthetic learning style, which aligns strongly with PjBL characteristics that emphasize hands-on practical activities. Student perceptions were classified as highly positive, with the highest ratings observed in the aspects of enhanced creativity and the relevance of projects to real-world applications. An interesting finding highlights the presence of "productive struggle," where, although task difficulty was rated as challenging, students perceived this difficulty as highly instrumental in developing new skills. Regarding problem-solving abilities, students felt competent in procedural design and analysis; however, accurate data collection and hypothesis formulation were identified as areas with the lowest scores. It is concluded that while PjBL is effective in enhancing student competence, its implementation requires optimization through more intensive scaffolding regarding the technical aspects of data measurement and hypothesis formulation, alongside improved laboratory facility support.

References

Aljohani, M. (2016). A review of the use of social learning theories in educational studies. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1), 1-8.

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PjBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Baran, M., Maskan, A., & Yasar, S. (2018). Learning Physics through Project-Based Learning Game Techniques. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 221-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11215a

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(5), 29-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Emzir. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x

Fowler Jr., F. J. (2013). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gunawan, G., Herayanti, L., & Tamami, F. (2025a). Analysis of Science Education Students' Self-Efficacy in Developing Learning Products Through the Project-Based Learning Model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 11(1), 301-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v11i1.9545

Gunawan, G., Kosim, K., Nisrina, N., Busyairi, A., Harjono, A., & Herayanti, L. (2025b). Fostering Creative Thinking in Pre-Service Physics Teachers: A Project-Based Learning Model with E-Modules. Educational Process: International Journal, 19(1). e2025532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.19.532

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Kosim, K., Zainuri, B. N. S., & Qothrunnada, Q. (2025c). Multimodal approaches in problem-based, project-based, and inquiry-based learning models in science education: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-17.

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., Taufik, M., & Herayanti, L. (2019). Project-based learning on media development course to improve creativity of prospective physics teachers. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 2194 (1) p. 020032. AIP Publishing LLC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139764

Gunawan, G., Sahidu, H., Harjono, A., & Suranti, N. M. Y. (2017). The Effect of Project Based Learning With Virtual Media Assistance on Student’s Creativity in Physics. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13514

Hafsa, S., Nurhayati, S., & Rosana, D. (2021). The effectiveness of project-based learning model to improve students’ creative thinking skills in physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1873(1), 012028.

Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Han, S., & Bhattacharya, S. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Project-Based Learning on Students' Problem-Solving Skills and Scientific Understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(4), 543-568.

Handayani, R. D., Dwikoranto, & Susilo, A. (2017). Project-based learning as a learning model to improve physics students’ creative thinking skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 11-15.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Kiong, T. T., Rusly, N. S. M., Abd Hamid, R. I., Swaran, S. C. K., & Hanapi, Z. (2022). Inventive problem-solving in project-based learning on design and technology: a needs analysis for module development. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(1), 271-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i1.17196

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Krsmanovic, M. (2021). Course Redesign: Implementing Project-Based Learning to Improve Students' Self-Efficacy. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 21(2), 93-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i2.28723

Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). 7 Essentials for Project-Based Learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34-37.

Lee, B. C., & Chung, J. (2024). An empirical investigation of the impact of ChatGPT on creativity. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10), 1906-1914. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01953-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01953-1

Lin, C. S., & Wu, R. Y. W. (2016). Effects of web-based creative thinking teaching on students' creativity and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1675-1684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1558a

OECD (2018). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). The Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD Publishing.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Allen & Unwin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117407

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Prastowo, S. B., Suyatna, A., & Ryanti, D. (2019). The influence of learning style to students' physics learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012025.

Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Andrade-Vargas, L., Rivera-Rogel, D., & Durán-Medina, N. E. (2021). Pedagogical Models for Physics Education in a Digital Context. Sustainability, 13(11), 6009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137244

Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2020). The effect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 94-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.15

Santyasa, I. W., Rapi, N. K., & Sara, I. (2020). Project based learning and academic procrastination of students in learning physics. International Journal of instruction, 13(1), 489-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13132a

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suradika, A., Dewi, H. I., & Nasution, M. I. (2023). Project-based learning and problem-based learning models in critical and creative students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 153-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713

Ulfa, M., Wahyudi, W., Gunawan, G., & Gunada, I. W. (2024). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Student Creativity in Physics Learning. Indonesian Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 75-85.

Warshauer, M. L. (2015). Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3

Wijayati, N., Sumarni, W., & Supanti, S. (2019). Improving student creative thinking skills through project based learning. KnE Social Sciences, 408-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i18.4732

Zhou, C. (2012). Integrating creativity training into problem and project-based learning curriculum in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 488-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.714357

Author Biographies

Sutrio Sutrio, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Mataram

Gunawan Gunawan, University of Mataram

Physics Education

Hikmawati Hikmawati, University of Mataram

Physics Education Study Program

Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati, University of Mataram

Physics Education Study Program

Ahmad Busyairi, University of Mataram

Physics Education Study Program

Padia Haslinda, University of Mataram

Ahmad Hardyan Isnaini, University of Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Sutrio Sutrio, Gunawan Gunawan, Hikmawati Hikmawati, Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati, Ahmad Busyairi, Padia Haslinda, Ahmad Hardyan Isnaini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.