Self-Efficacy of 12th Grade Students in Physics Learning on Islamic, Private, and Public Schools
DOI:
10.29303/jpft.v11i1.8484Published:
2025-03-18Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): January-June (In Press)Keywords:
physics learning, self-efficacy, high school studentArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study compares students' self-efficacy in physics learning across three types of schools: Islamic schools, public schools, and private schools. A quantitative research method was employed, focusing on twelfth-grade students during the 2024/2025 academic year. The data were collected using a questionnaire adapted from the Physics Learning Self-Efficacy (PLSE) instrument, which included 31 questionnaire items covering five key indicators. The responses were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a 5% significance level. The findings indicated that students from Islamic schools demonstrated the highest mean self-efficacy in physics learning, followed by those in public and private schools. Among the five indicators, the Everyday Application (EA) indicator emerged as the strongest across all three school types, particularly in Islamic schools. Further analysis using the Tukey HSD test revealed a significant difference in self-efficacy levels between Islamic schools and both public and private schools, while no significant difference was observed between public and private schools. These results emphasized the critical role of a supportive learning environment, comprehensive teaching strategies, and enhanced practicum activities in fostering students' self-efficacy in physics learning.
References
Adi Prasetyo, W. (2023). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Dan Efikasi Diri Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(10), 1148–1174. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v4i10.2293
Amali, L. N., Anggani Linggar Bharati, D., & Rozi, F. (2022). The Implementation of High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Assessment to Evaluate the Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement. English Education Journal, 12(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.52571
Bandura, A. (1997). Albert_Bandura_Self_Efficacy_The_Exercis.pdf (pp. 5–174). https://www.academia.edu/28274869/Albert_Bandura_Self_Efficacy_The_Exercise_of_Control_W_H_Freeman_and_Co_1997_pdf
Chandra Shekhar, & Rajinder Kumar. (2016). Comparing Self-Efficacy of Government and Private High School Female Students. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.25215/0304.134
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research - Planning, COnducting, And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research - Fifth Edition. In AORN Journal (5th Editio). Pearson Education, Inc.
Ding, Y., Klapp, A., & Yang Hansen, K. (2024). The importance of mathematics self-concept and self-efficacy for mathematics achievement: A comparison between public and independent schools in Sweden. Educational Psychology, 44(8), 872–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2024.2410217
Dorfman, B.-S., & Fortus, D. (2019). Students’ self‐efficacy for science in different school systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21542
Fadhila, F., Ridlo, S., & Rini Indriyanti, D. (2020). Analysis of Learning Implementation, Self-Efficacy, and Students Attitude Towards Science in Relation with Science Literacy Article Info. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(3), 288–295. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise
Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2017). Research Methods in Applied Settings: An Integrated Approach to Design and Analysis (3rd Editio). Routledge.
Haryanto, P. C., & Arty, I. S. (2019). The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Natural Science to Improve Student’s HOTS and Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012106
Hasanah, R. S., Sholihin, H., & Nugraha, I. (2021). An Investigation of Junior High School Students’ Science Self-Efficacy and its Correlation with Their Science Achievement in Different School Systems. Article in Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.27275
Hendajany, N. (2016). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC VS PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN INDONESIA. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 6, 66–89. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiae.2016.006.01.4
Istiqomah, W., Purwanto, A., & Medriati, R. (2023). The Influence of Problem-Based Learning on Science Literacy Ability of Physics Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 14(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i2.65296
Maruta Pradana, R., Murtadlo, M., & Widodo, B. S. (2023). Strategi Sekolah Dalam Peningkatan Peserta Didik Baru (Studi Kasus Sma Labschool Unesa 1). Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal), 4(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.56667/dejournal.v4i1.952
Nenny Hendajany. (2021). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri Terhadap Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. Edum Journal, 4(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.31943/edumjournal.v4i2.99
Nicholus, G., Muwonge, C. M., & Joseph, N. (2023). The Role of Problem-Based Learning Approach in Teaching and Learning Physics: A Systematic Literature Review. F1000Research, 12(April), 951. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.136339.1
Nugraha, D. A., & Wulansari, T. (2023). Analisis Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar dan Self-efficacy Siswa pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Model Discovery Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.23969/pjme.v13i1.7376
OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 Results : Executive Summary.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 : Insight and Interpretations. In PISA 20019 at a Glance.
OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Results: The State of Learning and Equity in Education: Vol. I.
Priyono, C. D., Hidayatullah, R., Hankam, A. A., Wandi, J. I., & Aisyah, S. (2023). PERBANDINGAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DENGAN PENDIDIKAN UMUM DI INDONESIA. Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam, 3(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55062/2021/IJPI
Said, Z., Al-Emadi, A. A., Friesen, H. L., & Adam, E. (2018). Assessing the science interest, attitude, and self-efficacy of Qatari students at the preparatory, secondary, and university levels. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94733
Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & Botroli, L. De. (2013). A Teacher ’s Guide to PISA Scientific Literacy. https://www.acer.org/files/PISA_Thematic_Report_-_Maths_-_web.pdf
Tzung Jin Lin, & Chin Chung Tsai. (2013). A Multi Dimensional Instrument for Evaluatingg Taiwanese High School Students’ Science Learning Self-Efficacy in Relation to their Approaches to Learning Science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1275–1301.
Author Biographies
Dwisri Wardani, State University of Malang
Physics Education Study Program
Endang Purwaningsih, State University of Malang
Physics Education Study Program
Markus Diantoro, State University of Malang
Physics Education Study Program
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dwisri Wardani, Endang Purwaningsih, Markus Diantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
