Improving Learning Outcomes on the Musculoskeletal System through Direct Instruction with Biology Magazines
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v20i6.9789Published:
2025-09-27Issue:
Vol. 20 No. 6 (2025): in ProgressKeywords:
Biology Magazine; Direct Instruction; Learning Outcomes; Musculoskeletal SystemArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The students of class XI IPA 2 at MAN 1 Kubu Raya demonstrated low understanding of the musculoskeletal system, which resulted in poor learning outcomes. This issue stemmed from the dominance of a teacher-centered approach, where learning relied heavily on lectures guided by textbooks. A potential solution is the implementation of a structured learning model, such as direct instruction, which has the capacity to enhance student learning outcomes. Furthermore, integrating the direct instruction model with biology magazines can stimulate students’ interest, attention, and comprehension of the topic. This research aimed to examine the improvement of student learning outcomes on the musculoskeletal system through the application of the direct instruction model assisted by biology magazines in class XI IPA 2 at MAN 1 Kubu Raya. The research employed Classroom Action Research, conducted in two cycles, each consisting of two meetings following the stages of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The research subjects were 33 students of XI IPA 2, with instruments comprising observation sheets and learning outcome test sheets, both validated and confirmed reliable. Data analysis involved calculating the percentage of implementation based on observation results, followed by determining the percentage of classical achievement of learning outcomes. The findings revealed an increase in learning outcomes, from 78.18% in Cycle I to 84.40% in Cycle II, with learning implementation reaching 100% in both cycles. These results indicate that the use of the direct instruction model assisted by biology magazines can significantly improve student learning outcomes on the musculoskeletal system. This implies that integrating the direct instruction model with an innovative learning media (such as magazines) can provide structured, engaging, and comprehensive biology learning experiences that effectively enhance students’ learning outcomes.
References
M. L. Jusita, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning) untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” J. Teor. dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 90–95, 2019, doi: 10.17977/um022v4i22019p090.
N. Hazmi, “Tugas Guru dalam Proses Pembelajaran,” J. Educ. Instr., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2019, doi: 10.31539/joeai.v2i1.734.
I. Junaedi, “Proses Pembelajaran yang Efektif,” J. Inf. Syst. Applied, Manag. Account. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 19–25, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.journal.stmikjayakarta.ac.id/index.php/jisamar/article/view/86
J. Mirdad, “Model-model Pembelajaran (Empat Rumpun Model Pembelajaran),” J. Sakinah, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2020, doi: 10.2564/js.v2i1.17.
M. A. Faturrahman and K. Ningsih, “Studi Literatur: Penerapan Model Discovery Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup,” J. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7262–7274, 2023, doi: 10.31004/joe.v6i1.3956.
S. Suratno, M. Muazza, R. Murboyono, and D. Guspita, “What is the Effect of Learning Models and Interests on Study Results?,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 804–814, 2023, doi: 10.21831/cp.v42i3.52342.
E. Maulida, E. Ariyati, and R. Marlina, “Penerapan Direct Instruction Disertai Teknik Akrostik terhadap Hasil Belajar Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.26418/jppk.v8i9.35643.
M. Pritandhari, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa,” PROMOSI J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Ekon., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2017, doi: 10.24127/ja.v5i1.845.
D. N. Sitompul and I. Hayati, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction Berbasis Games terhadap Minat Belajar Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Akuntansi Pasiva Program Studi Pendidikan Akuntansi FKIP UMSU TA 2017/2018,” Liabilities (Jurnal Pendidik. Akuntansi), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 243–253, 2019, doi: 10.30596/liabilities.v2i3.4023.
F. H. Haqqi, N. Sari, S. T. Widodo, and P. Purwoedi, “Pembiasaan Perilaku Sila Pancasila melalui Media Pop Up Book dan Papan Pengamalan Pancasila di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 3673–3682, 2023, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v7i6.6380.
T. Tafonao, “Peranan Media Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Mahasiswa,” J. Komun. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–114, 2018, doi: 10.32585/jkp.v2i2.113.
A. Fadilah, K. R. Nurzakiyah, N. A. Kanya, S. P. Hidayat, and U. Setiawan, “Pengertian Media, Tujuan, Fungsi, Manfaat dan Urgensi Media Pembelajaran,” J. Student Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.55606/jsr.v1i2.938.
N. Setiyawati, S. Syamswisna, and A. B. Tenriawaru, “Kelayakan Biodiversity Magazine: Majalah pada Submateri Pemanfaatan Keanekaragaman Hayati Berbasis Tumbuhan Kosmetik,” Didakt. Biol. J. Penelit. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 2021, doi: 10.32502/dikbio.v5i2.4169.
B. Rangsing, S. Subiki, and R. D. Handayani, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Berbasis Majalah Siswa Pintar Fisika (MSPF) pada Pembelajaran IPA di SMP (Pokok Bahasan Gerak pada Benda),” J. Pembelajaran Fis. Univ. Jember, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 243–247, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://jpf.jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/2645
A. Aslikah, M. S. Putri, and H. A. Kumara, “Penerapan Project Historia Magazine untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah di Kelas X E 3 SMAN 1 Ciamis,” J. Wahana Pendidik., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 53–68, 2025, doi: 10.25157/jwp.v12i1.17160.
A. S. Munna and M. A. Kalam, “Teaching and Learning Process to Enhance Teaching Effectiveness: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Humanit. Innov., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2021, doi: 10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102.
E. Candrawati, “Penerapan Model Direct Instruction untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi,” J. Educ. FKIP UNMA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 140–146, 2020, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v6i1.287.
H. B. Dani, Y. Yahdi, and H. K. Ningrat, “Pengembangan Majalah Biologi (Biomagz) pada Materi Virus sebagai Alternatif Sumber Belajar Mandiri Siswa Kelas X di MAN 1 Mataram,” Biota, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 92–104, 2017, doi: 10.20414/jb.v10i1.26.
S. Arikunto, S. Suhardjono, and S. Supardi, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara, 2015.
S. Syaifudin, “Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Teori dan Aplikasinya pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab,” Borneo J. Islam. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.37567/borneo.v1i2.440.
B. Rahmawati, S. N. Aulia, S. Rosdiana, Y. I. Zaenah, and Z. Zaenudin, “Isu tentang Jumlah Siklus Penelitian dalam Penelitian Tindakan Kelas,” J. Kreat. Mhs., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 76–84, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://riset-iaid.net/index.php/jpm/article/view/1437
E. Sulistiyowati, “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Menggunakan Think Pair Share Berbantuan PowerPoint pada Materi Ekologi dan Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia di Kelas VII C SMPN 3 Sungai Kakap,” Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, 2024.
L. R. Aiken, “Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 1985, doi: 10.1177/0013164485451012.
T. K. Koo and M. Y. Li, “A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research,” J. Chiropr. Med., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
F. Yusup, “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif,” Tarb. J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2018, doi: 10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100.
R. Riyani, S. Maizora, and H. Hanifah, “Uji Validitas Pengembangan Tes untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemahaman Relasional pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat Siswa Kelas VIII SMP,” J. Penelit. Pembelajaran Mat. Sekol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 60–65, 2017, doi: 10.33369/jp2ms.1.1.60-65.
H. Pantas and K. Surbakti, “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick,” J. Curere, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2020, doi: 10.36764/jc.v4i1.333.
Y. Listiani, K. Ningsih, and R. G. P. Panjaitan, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Make a Match Berbantuan Video untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.26418/jppk.v9i8.41778.
C. A. Mertler, Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators, Fifth Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2017.
V. Bhardwaj, S. Zhang, Y. Q. Tan, and V. Pandey, “Redefining Learning: Student-centered Strategies for Academic and Personal Growth,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, p. 1518602, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602.
N. Pratiwi, G. Gardjito, and A. Hamidah, “Pengembangan Majalah Biologi sebagai Media Pembelajaran pada Pokok Bahasan Protista Kelas X MIA di SMAN 7 Kota Jambi,” BIODIK, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2017, doi: 10.22437/bio.v3i1.4880.
L. Darling-Hammond, L. Flook, C. Cook-Harvey, B. Barron, and D. Osher, “Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development,” Appl. Dev. Sci., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 97–140, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
N. Nufitasari, A. N. Mardiyyaningsih, and A. B. Tenriawaru, “Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes through Make-a-match Cooperative Model on Human Respiratory System Topic,” J. Pijar MIPA, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 922–927, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v19i5.7421.
L. A. Abdillah et al., Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Teori dan Penerapannya. Indramayu: Penerbit Adab, 2021.
L. Chorrojprasert, “Learner Readiness – Why and How Should They Be Ready?,” Learn J. Lang. Educ. Acquis. Res. Netw., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 268–274, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/237856
S. Dominguez and V. Svihla, “A Review of Teacher Implemented Scaffolding in K-12,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 100613, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100613.
M. A. Cicekci and F. Sadik, “Teachers’ and Students’ Opinions about Students’ Attention Problems during the Lesson,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 15–30, 2019, doi: 10.5539/jel.v8n6p15.
H. Asma and S. Dallel, “Cognitive Load Theory and its Relation to Instructional Design: Perspectives of Some Algerian University Teachers of English,” Arab World English J., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 110–127, 2020, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8.
S. D. Besare, “Hubungan Minat dengan Aktivitas Belajar Siswa,” JINOTEP (Jurnal Inov. dan Teknol. Pembelajaran) Kaji. dan Ris. dalam Teknol. Pembelajaran, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2020, doi: 10.17977/um031v7i12020p018.
Author Biographies
Nuruliza Nabila, Biology Education Study Program, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia
Titin Titin, Biology Education Study Program, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia
Eko Sri Wahyuni, Biology Education Study Program, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nuruliza Nabila, Titin Titin, Eko Sri Wahyuni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
