Penerapan Model Peer Led Team Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Kimia
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v14i1.999Published:
2019-03-28Issue:
Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019): MaretKeywords:
Peer Led Team Learning, Hasil Belajar, Sikap Terhadap Kimia, Reaksi RedoksArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Reaksi redoks merupakan materi yang masih dianggap sulit oleh siswa sekolah menengah atas. Penggunaan model yang dapat meningkatkan motivasi belajar diharapkan mampu mengatasi kesulitan belajar siswa. Peer Led Team Learning (PLTL) adalah salah satu model pembelajaran yang memiliki keunggulan untuk dapat mengatasi kesulitan siswa dalam belajar reaksi redoks. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan PLTL terhadap hasil belajar dan sikap siswa terhadap kimia. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK) dengan model Kurt Lewin sebanyak 2 siklus. Pelaksanaan pada kelas XII MAN 2 Mataram dengan jumlah siswa sebanyak 44. Hasil penelitian pada siklus I menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata skor hasil belajar siswa sebesar 64,64 dan sikap terhadap kimia menunjukkan rata-rata sebesar 4,19. Perbaikan yang dilakukan pada siklus II sebagai hasil refleksi siklus I adalah menggunakan demonstrasi sederhana dan mengatur kembali anggota kelompok siswa. Siklus II menunjukkan peningkatan skor hasil belajar dan sikap terhadap kimia masing-masing sebesar 72,27 dan 4,41. Dengan demikian, penerapan model PLTL mampu meningkatkan hasil belajar dan sikap terhadap kimia siswa MAN 2 Mataram pada pokok bahasan reaksi redoks.
References
Everaert, P., Opdecam, E., & Maussen, S. (2017). The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent. Accounting Education 26(1), 78-107.
Broman, K., Ekborg, M., & Johnels, J. (2011). Chemistry in crisis? Perspectives on teaching and learning chemistry in Swedish upper secondary schools. Nordina, 7(1), 43-53.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Analisis Kemampuan Sains Domain Konten dan Kognitif Siswa Indonesia Kelas VIII SMP/MTs Berdasarkan Data TIMSS 2007. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Thomas, G.P., & Anderson, D. (2014). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom environment to enhance studentsââ¬â¢ metacognition regarding chemistry learning. Learning Environment Resouces, 17, 139-155.
Adnan, M.A.M., Nordin, M.S., Ibrahim, M.B. (2013). Relationship between strategies and motivation by using structural equation modeling approach. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 1(3), 33-40.
Rahmayanti, N., Muntari, M., & Siahaan, J. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Diskusi Kelas dengan Teknik Buzz Group Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kimia Materi Pokok Hidrokarbon. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 9(1).
Ningsyih, S., Junaidi, E., & Al Idrus, S. W. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Praktikum Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(1).
Rubini, B., & Liliasari. (2013). Basic Natural Sciences Contribution for Scientific Attitude Development and Values of Life. International Journal of Science and Research 2 (5), 465ââ¬â468.
Azizah, N. (2016). Pengembangan Lks Dan Penerapannya Dalam Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(1).
Qomaliyah, E. N., Sukib, S., & Loka, I. N. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbasis literasi sains terhadap hasil belajar materi pokok larutan penyangga. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(2).
Yulianti, R., Muntari, M., & Haris, M. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe two stay two stray (tsts) dengan pendekatan brain-based learning terhadap hasil belajar kimia materi pokok struktur atom dan sistem periodik unsur pada siswa kelas x sman 1 kediri. Jurnal pijar MIPA, 10(1).
Daud, S., Chaudhry, A.M., Ali, S.K. (2016). Lecture based peer assisted learning: quasi experimental study to compare knowledge gain of fourth year medical students in community health and nutrition course. Res Dev Med Educ, 5(2), 62-68.
Felder RM & Brent R. 2007. Cooperative Learning. P.A. Mabrouk, ed., Active Learning: Models from the analytical sciences, ACS symposium series 970, Chapter 4, pp. 34-53. Washington DC: American Chemical Society.
Dooly, M. 2008. Contructing knowledge together (21-45). Extract from telecollaborative language learning: a guidebook to moderating intercultural collaboration online. Bern: Peter Lang.
Gillies R & Boyle M. 2007. Cooperative learning: a smart pedagogy for successful learning. Queensland: school of education The Universiy of Queensland.
Cheung, D. (2011) Evaluating student attitude toward chemistry lessons to enhance teaching in the secondary school. Educacion Quimica, 22(2), 1-8.
Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian: panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Froyd J. 2015. Positive interdependence, individual accountability, promotive interaction: three pillars of cooperative learning. http://www.foundationscoalition.org.
Snyder, J.J., Sloane, J.D., Dunk, R.D.P., & Wiles, J.R. (2016). Peer Led Team Learning Helps Minority Students Succeed. Plos Biol, 14(3), 1-7.
Pamela White, D.N.P., Amy Beth Rowland, M.S., Irene Pesis-Katz. (2012). Peer Led Team Learning Model in a Graduate-Level Nursing Course. Journal of Nursing Education 51(8), 471-475.
Snyder, J.J., Carter, B.E., Wiles, J.R. (2015) Implementation of the peer led team learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14, 1-6.
Johnston, E.C., Robbins, B.A., & Loui, M.C. (2015). What do students experience as peer leader of learning teams. Advances in Engineering Education, 1, 1-22.
Koeslag-Kreuner, M., Van de Bossche, P., Hoven, M., Van der Klink, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2018). When leadership powers team learning s meta analysis. Small Group Research 49(4), 475-513.
Author Biographies
Yunita Arian Sani Anwar, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Hariantini Hariantini, MAN 2 Mataram, Indonesia
License
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
