Analysis of Traders’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Beef Products at the Slaughterhouse of the Department of Food Security, Agriculture, and Fisheries (DKP3), Sragen Regency
DOI:
10.29303/jbt.v26i2.11874Published:
2026-05-07Downloads
Abstract
The quality of beef products plays an important role in determining trader satisfaction, especially in slaughterhouses that function as providers of safe, healthy, whole, and halal meat. However, several problems related to product quality, such as inconsistent color, fat content, and freshness, may lead to trader dissatisfaction. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the level of product quality and its effect on trader satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of beef product quality and trader satisfaction at the slaughterhouse managed by the Department of Food Security, Agriculture, and Fisheries of Sragen Regency. The research utilized a descriptive quantitative approach through a survey method. Information was gathered via a structured questionnaire featuring a Likert scale (1–5), which was given to 20 beef vendors. The analysis focused on variables such as product quality (including color, texture, marbling, smell, and freshness) as the independent variable and vendor satisfaction as the dependent variable. Data was examined using descriptive statistics along with simple linear regression. Findings indicated that vendors typically held a favorable view of the quality of beef products, as indicated by the prevalence of “agree” and “strongly agree” answers across all measured factors. The statistical analysis showed that product quality had a noteworthy positive effect on vendor satisfaction, indicated by a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.915, suggesting that 91.5% of vendor satisfaction was affected by product quality. Furthermore, the regression analysis pointed to a significant connection (p < 0.05) between product quality and vendor satisfaction. In summary, the quality of beef products has a major impact on vendor satisfaction at the slaughterhouse. Thus, it is critical to uphold and enhance product quality to guarantee vendor satisfaction and maintain business viability.
Keywords:
Beef Product quality Regression analysis Slaughterhouse Trader satisfactionReferences
Fajri, Aulia Irhamni, Nurafi Razna Suhaima, Dewi Elfrida Sihombing, Muhamad Arifin, Ai Imas, Faidoh Fatimah, Mrr Lukie Trianawati, Supervisor Jaminan, Mutu Pangan, Sekolah Vokasi, Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Peternakan, Nusa Cendana, and Fakultas Peternakan. 2025. “Keamanan Mikrobiologi Daging Sapi : Tinjauan Literatur Tentang Analisis Total Plate Count ( TPC ) Di Rumah Potong Hewan Berbagai Wilayah Indonesia.” JIPHO (Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Halu Oleo) 7(3):321–32. doi: 10.56625/jipho .v7i3.267.
Forester, Brayen Jodi, Amna Idris, Abdallah Khater, Muhammad Win Afgani, Muhammad Isnaini, Universitas Islam, Negeri Raden, and Fatah Palembang. 2024. “Penelitian Kuantitatif : Uji Reliabilitas Quantitative Research : Data Reliability Test.” Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 4(3):1812–20. doi: https://doi .org/10.56832/edu.v4i3.577.
Hapidin, Asep, Abdul Basith, and Jono M. Munandar. 2019. “Analisis Atribut Produk Pada Manajemen Mutu Proses Produksi Daging Sapi Di RPH PT. Elders Indonesia, Bogor.” Aplikasi Manajemen Dan Bisnis 5(1):84–94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.173 58/jabm.5.1.84.
Juhari, F., H. Nuraini, L. Cyrilla, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Insitut Pertanian Bogor, and Fakultas Peternakan. 2017. “Analisis Nilai Tambah Produk Rumah Potong Hewan ( Studi Kasus RPH Kategori I Dan RPH Kategori II ).” Ilmu Produksi Dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan 05(2):49–55. doi:https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/ipthp/article/view/23641.
Kementerian Pertanian, R. .. 2020. Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pertanian 2020-2024. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.
Kotler, P., and K. Keller. 2016. Marketing Management (15th Ed). Pearson Education Limited.
Kurniawan, Media Agus, S. Pt, M. Pt, Staf Pengajar, Fakultas Sains, Universitas Pembangunan, and Panca Budi. 2020. “Analisis Distribusi Daging Sapi Dari Rumah Pemotongan Hewan (RPH) Sampai Ke Konsumen Kota Binjai.” Jurnal of Animal Science and Agronomy Panca Budi 05.
Kurniawati, Emilia, and Sulastri Rini Rindrayani. 2025. “Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dengan Penelitian Survei : Studi Kasus Dan Implikasinya.” doi: https://doi.org /10.62383/sosial.v3i1.596.
Nidianti, Ersalina, Dea Ayu Rahmawati, Usih Agustina, Program Studi, Analis Kesehatan, Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama, and Jawa Timur. 2023. “Pengaruh Waktu Penggorengan Dan Perebusan Daging Sapi Terhadap Kadar Protein.” 6(2):198–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.36341/jops.v6i2.3476.
Nurgiartiningsih, V. A., and S. I. Santoso. 2019. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Pembelian Daging Sapi Di Pasar Tradisional.” Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 29(1).
Puradireja, R, H., L. Herlina, and H. Arief. 2021. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Permintaan Daging Sapi Di Provinsi Lampung.” Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis 7(2):1439–48. doi: https://doi.org/10. 2515 7/MA.V7I2.5444.
Purnama, Itang, Fikya Juanda, Daeva Mubarika Raisa, Program Studi, Teknologi Pakan, Jurusan Teknologi, Industri Pertanian, Politeknik Negeri, Tanah Laut, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Mataram, and Nusa Tenggara Barat. 2025. “Peran Usaha Ternak Dalam Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan Dan Ekonomi Keluarga : Kajian Studi Literatur.” JIPHO (Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Halu Oleo) 7(4):511–17. doi: 10.56625/jipho.v7i4.406.
Putri, Anna Nadia. 2017. “Preferensi Konsumen Terhadap Daging Sapi Di Pasar Tradisional Kota Padang (Studi Kasus ‘Pasar Raya’ Kota Padang).”
Putri, Azka Dhianti, Rahma Sayyida Hilmia, Salwa Almaliyah, Sidik Permana, and Universitas Pendidikan. 2023. “Pengaplikasian Uji t Dalam Penelitian Eksperimen.” Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika 4(3):1978–87. doi:10.46306/lb.v 4i3.
Ramadhan, Alif, Fadhil Ardiansyah, Muhammad Ryan Harmawan, and Asty Adelia. 2025. “Potensi Pengembangan Ternak Sapi Potong Dalam Sektor Agribsinsis : Analisis Pengaruh Produksi Dan Harga Terhadap Pendapatan Peternak Di Kecamatan Perbaungan Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai.” (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.62951/bota ni.v2i1.201.
Ridayana, Allya Putri, Unang Yunasaf, and Anita Fitriani. 2023. “Analisis Preferensi Dan Kepuasan Konsumen Terhadap Pembelian Daging Sapi ( Studi Kasus Di Perumahan Taman Rahayu Kabupaten Bandung ).” 4(2):40–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.241 98/jsdh.v4i2.49464.
Saptana, and Nyak Ilham. 2017. “Manajemen Rantai Pasok Komoditas Ternak Dan Daging Sapi Supply Chain Management of Cattle and Beef Commodities.” Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian 15(1):83–98. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v15n1.2017.83-98.
Sayuri, Fitria, Sientje D. Rumetor, and Priyo Sambodo. 2024. “Prosedur Pemotongan Dan Kualitas Daging Sapi Yang Dipotong Di Tempat Pemotongan Hewan ( TPH ) Di Kota Jayapura Slaughtering Procedure and Meat Quality at TPH in Jayapura City.” Jurnal Sain Veteriner 42(1):99–106. doi: 10.22146/jsv.76115.
Septyawati, Gadis Ayu, Ida bagus Ngurah Swacita, and I. Ketut Suada. 2023. “Perbandingan Kualitas Fisik Daging Sapi Bali Produksi Rumah Potong Hewan Di Kabupaten Badung Dan Buleleng.” Buletin Veteriner Udayana 15(158):297–302. doi: 10.24843/bulvet.2023.v15.i02.p16.
Shinta, Clara, Asri Alpina, Bintal Amin, and Karyawan Swasta. 2021. “Analisis Manajemen Rumah Potong Hewan Kecamatan Tampan Kota Pekanbaru Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Lingkungan.” 15(September):130–39. doi: https://doi.o rg/10.31258/jil.15.2.p.130-139.
Subhaktiyasa, Putu Gede. n.d. “Evaluasi Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif : Sebuah Studi Pustaka.” 5(4):5599–5609. doi: https://do i.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1747.
Syakur, Moh A., S. H. Purnomo, and B. S. Hertanto. 2017. “Analisis Rantai Pasokan ( Supply Chain ) Daging Sapi Dari Rumah Pemotongan Hewan Sampai Konsumen Di Kota Surakarta Analysis of Supply Chain Beef Cattle from Slaughterhouses to Consumers in Surakarta City.” 15(September):52–58. doi: http://dx.d oi.org/10.20961/sainspet.v15i2.11444.
Widianingrum, Desy Cahya, and Rindi Wirantika Septio. 2023. “Peran Peternakan Dalam Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia : Kondisi , Potensi , Dan Peluang Pengembangan.” 2(3):285–91. doi: https:/ /doi.org/10.32528/nms.v2i3.298.
Yam, Jim Hoy, and Ruhiyat Taufik. 2021. “Hipotesis Penelitian Kuantitatif.” Perspektif: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi 3(2):96–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.33 592/perspektif.v3i2.1540.
Yusup, Febrianawati. 2018. “Uji Validitas Dan Reabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif.” Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan 7(1):17–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100.
Zulfikar, Iwan, Maslina, and Sri Rahmawati Hamzah. 2022. “Evaluasi Standar Hygiene Sanitasi Rumah Potong Hewan KM 5,5 Balikpapan.” Keselamatan, Kesehatan Kerja Dan Lindungan Lingkungan 8(1):594–604. doi: https://doi.org/10.36 277/identifikasi.v8i1.228.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asykal Fira Yahya, Catur Suci Purwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Biologi Tropis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the author as the owner of the paper. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
Authors are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at the journal. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
