Diffusion and Adoption of Destana in Tropical Disaster-Prone Socio-Ecological Systems

Authors

Zulfa Rosdiana , Moh. Taqiuddin , Agus Purbathin Hadi

DOI:

10.29303/jbt.v26i3.12439

Published:

2026-07-06

Downloads

Abstract

Tropical island villages face complex disaster risks due to the interaction between geophysical hazards, hydrometeorological threats, social vulnerability, and local institutional capacity. This study aimed to analyze the diffusion and adoption of the Disaster Resilient Village Program (Desa Tangguh Bencana, Destana) in strengthening community preparedness in Sambelia District, East Lombok, Indonesia. A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted in Sugian, Belanting, and Obel-Obel villages from November to December 2025. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observation, and document review involving 17 informants from the regional disaster management agency, village governments, disaster volunteers, NGO/TSBD actors, community leaders, and residents. Data were analyzed thematically using Rogers’ diffusion of innovations framework and a disaster risk perspective linking hazards, vulnerability, and capacity. The results show that Destana is relevant for multi-hazard villages, but its adoption remains partial. Administrative recognition was not fully followed by strong village documentation, active local institutions, continuous communication, or integration into village development planning. Community members accepted disaster preparedness practices, yet they did not always recognize Destana as a formal village-based innovation. The study concludes that Destana needs stronger risk communication, institutional renewal, regular simulation, and integration into village planning to transform administrative designation into sustained socio-ecological resilience.

Keywords:

Community preparedness Destana Disaster risk reduction Diffusion of innovation Socio-ecological resilience

References

Aitsi-Selmi, A., Egawa, S., Sasaki, H., Wannous, C., & Murray, V. (2016). The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: Renewing the global commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well-being. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0050-9

Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299

Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299

Amri, A., Bird, D. K., Ronan, K., Haynes, K., & Towers, B. (2018). Disaster risk reduction education in Indonesia: Challenges and recommendations for scaling up. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 18(2), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-595-2018

Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Society & Natural Resources, 26(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.736605

BNPB. (2012). Peraturan Kepala BNPB Nomor 1 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Umum Desa/Kelurahan Tangguh Bencana. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Ciullo, A., Viglione, A., Castellarin, A., Crisci, M., & Di Baldassarre, G. (2017). Socio-hydrological modelling of flood-risk dynamics: Comparing the resilience of green and technological systems. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62(6), 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1273527

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cutter, S. L. (2016). The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards, 80, 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2

Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Affairs, 37(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104

Di Baldassarre, G., Viglione, A., Carr, G., Kuil, L., Salinas, J. L., & Blöschl, G. (2013). Socio-hydrology: Conceptualising human-flood interactions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(8), 3295–3303. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013

Imperiale, A. J., & Vanclay, F. (2021). Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 29(5), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2182

Imperiale, A. J., & Vanclay, F. (2021). Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 29(5), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2182

Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2013). Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 33(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x

Lassa, J. A., Surjan, A., Caballero-Anthony, M., & Fisher, R. (2018). Measuring political will: An index of commitment to disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.006

Lin, C. A. (2023). Flood risk management via risk communication, cognitive appraisal, collective efficacy, and community action. Sustainability, 15(19), 14191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914191

Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012). The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x

Maidl, E., & Buchecker, M. (2015). Raising risk preparedness by flood risk communication. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(7), 1577–1595. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1577-2015

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Paton, D. (2019). Disaster risk reduction: Psychological perspectives on preparedness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12237

Paton, D. (2019). Disaster risk reduction: Psychological perspectives on preparedness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12237

Räsänen, A., Lein, H., Bird, D., & Setten, G. (2020). Conceptualizing community in disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45, 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101485

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Tiernan, A., Drennan, L., Nalau, J., Onyango, E., Morrissey, L., & Mackey, B. (2019). A review of themes in disaster resilience literature and international practice since 2012. Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240

Tiernan, A., Drennan, L., Nalau, J., Onyango, E., Morrissey, L., & Mackey, B. (2019). A review of themes in disaster resilience literature and international practice since 2012. Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications

Author Biographies

Zulfa Rosdiana, Universty of Mataram

Author Origin : Indonesia

Moh. Taqiuddin, University of Mataram

Author Origin : Indonesia

Agus Purbathin Hadi, University of Mataram

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Rosdiana, Z., Taqiuddin, M., & Hadi, A. P. (2026). Diffusion and Adoption of Destana in Tropical Disaster-Prone Socio-Ecological Systems. Jurnal Biologi Tropis, 26(3), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v26i3.12439

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.