Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Konsep Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa Dan Mahasiswa: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis
Published:
2026-03-10Downloads
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to: 1) Identify the role of concept-based mathematics learning in improving student competencies; 2) Identify factors that influence concept-based mathematics learning; 3) Identify competencies that are influenced by concept-based understanding. This research reviewed 15 from 507 articles in 2014-2024 from the Google Scholar, Scopus database and Sinta 1 indexed national journals. The result of this study is that concept-based mathematics learning can systematically improve students' mathematical competence. The findings of factors that influence concept-based mathematics learning are mathematical mindset and concept understanding of teachers, teaching strategies, conceptual knowledge, and assessment and feedback. Furthermore, concept-based knowledge in this literature review can improve long-term retention, meaningful understanding, critical thinking, metacognition, problem solving and self-regulated.
Keywords:
conceptualized learning student competence collage student competence pedagogy andragogyReferences
Alexander, P. A., & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722511
Al-Mutawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge and problem-solving skills in mathematics: High school graduates work analysis and standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
Attridge N, Inglis M (2013) Advanced Mathematical Study and the Development of Conditional Reasoning Skills. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069399
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?
Bawadi, S., Pujiastuti, H., & Fathurrohman, M. (2023). Pemahaman Konsep Matematika dengan Teknik Scaffoldıng : Systematic Literature Review. 9(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202391.400
Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-010-9242-9/METRICS
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. In National Academy Press. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853
Espinoza-Vásquez, G., Henríquez-Rivas, C., Climent, N., Ponce, R., & Verdugo-Hernández, P. (2025). Teaching Thales’s theorem: relations between suitable mathematical working spaces and specialised knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 118(2), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10367-9
Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. . (1988). Overview. In M.T.H. Chi, R. Glaser, M. J. Farr, & N. Hillsdale (Eds.), The Nature of Expertise (pp. xv–xxvii). Erlbaum.
Glassner, A., & Back, S. (2020). Exploring Heutagogy in Higher Education. Academia Meets the Zeitgeist. https://doi.org/https://doi.og/10.1007/978-981-15-4144-5
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From anragogy to heutagogy (Ultibase A). Deakin University Press.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York Macmillan. - Reference - Scientific Research Publishing. Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=79430
Hinsley, D. A., Hayes, J. R., & H.A, S. (1977). From words to equations: Meaning and representation in algebra word problems. In N. Hillsdale (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Comprehension, M.A. Just and P.A. Carpenter (pp. 89–106).
Khairunnisa, A., Gozali, S. M., & Juandi, D. (2022). Systematic Literature Review : Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. 06(02), 1846–1856.
Knowles, S. . (1970). The modern practice of adult education. Association Press.
Knowles, S. . (1980). The modern practice of adult education (revised and updated ed). Follett Publishing Company.
Lindeman, E. (1926). The meaning of adult education. New Republic Inc.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. In Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (p. 262). https://www.nctm.org/store/Products/NCTM-Principles-and-Standards-for-School-Mathematics,-Full-Edition-(PDF)/
Pirie, S. E. B. (1988). Understanding: Instrumental, Relational, Intuitive, Constructed, Formalised ... ? How can we know? For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 2–6.
Resnick, I., Davatzes, A., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2017). Using Relational Reasoning to Learn About Scientific Phenomena at Unfamiliar Scales. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9371-5
Robinson, C. ., & Hayes, J. R. (1978). Making inferences about relevance in understanding problems. In R. Revlin & M. R.E. (Eds.), Human Reasoning. Winston.
Setiani, R., Rizki, H., Nuraida, I., & Widiastuti, T. T. (2025). Membangun Pemahaman Konsep Matematis melalui Pendekatan Matematika Realistik : Systematic Literature Review. 9(1), 131–146.
Skemp, R. R. (2012). The Psychology of learning mathematics: Expanded American edition. In The Psychology of Learning Mathematics: Expanded American Edition (pp. 1–218). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203396391
Sternberg, R. J., & Ben-Zevv, T. (2009). The Nature of Mathematical Thinking. Routledge & CRC Press.
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept Image and Concept Definition In Mathematics With Particular Reference to Limits and Continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.
Wong, T. T.-Y., & Morsanyi, K. (2023). The link between transitive reasoning and mathematics achievement in preadolescence: the role of relational processing and deductive reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 29(4), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2022.2095031
Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0606-5
Zhao, H., Alexander, P. A., & Sun, Y. (2021). Relational reasoning’s contributions to mathematical thinking and performance in Chinese elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 279–303. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000595
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anjarwati Anjarwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
