Evaluasi Penerapan Realistic Mathematics Education Berbantuan GeoGebra Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Menggunakan Model CIPP
Authors
Farizal Ramadhan , Ali Mahmudi , M. Tata Aulia RahmanDOI:
10.29303/jm.v7i3.9944Published:
2025-09-24Issue:
Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Edisi SeptemberKeywords:
CIPP Model Evaluation; GeoGebra; Realistic Mathematics EducationArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach assisted by GeoGebra in teaching mathematics at a public junior high school in the city center. To assess the extent to which the implementation of RME meets the desired learning standards, the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product) was applied. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis, and analyzed using a descriptive-evaluative method. The findings reveal that the implementation of RME assisted by GeoGebra generally meets the required criteria. The context component reached 100%, input 80%, while the process and product components achieved 85% and 100%, respectively, all of which are categorized as highly appropriate. Nevertheless, several challenges were identified, including limited internet access for using GeoGebra, the lack of professional certification among some teachers, and less-than-ideal instructional time. Overall, the RME approach assisted by GeoGebra proved effective in enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of mathematics, particularly on the topic of three-dimensional shapes such as cubes and rectangular prisms. The average score of students’ conceptual understanding increased significantly from 47.76% in the pretest to 80.29% in the posttest, with the indicator “restating a concept” showing the highest improvement at 93.27%.
References
Al-Shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of self-learning curriculum for kindergarten using Stufflebeam’s CIPP model. SAGE Open, 9(1), 215824401882238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822380
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2018). Evaluasi program pendidikan: Pedoman teoretis praktis bagi mahasiswa dan praktisi pendidikan. PT Bumi Aksara.
Arsaythamby, V., & Zubainur, C. M. (2014). How a realistic mathematics educational approach affect students’ activities in primary schools? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.378
Azizah, A. N., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). The effectiveness of software GeoGebra to improve visual representation ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012059
Badan Standar Kurikulum Asesmen Pembelajaran. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen pendidikan anak usia dini, pendidikan dasar, dan menengah. Kemendikbud Ristek.
Badaruddin, & Yani, T. A. (2023). Analisis penggunaan GeoGebra berbantuan Chromebook untuk memudahkan siswa memahami konsep matematika materi bangun ruang sisi datar kelas VIII. Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah, 9(2), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v9i2.1722
Damayanti, E., Ibrahim, E. E., & Ismail, M. I. (2021). Evaluation of online learning programs at universities using the CIPP model. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v6i1.4678
Fadila, K. A., Amrullah, Primajati, G., & Hikmah, N. (2025). Pengembangan media interaktif pada materi geometri dengan website berbasis Geogebra siswa kelas IX di SMPN 9 Mataram. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 7(2), 639-649. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v7i2.9231
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. CD Press.
Haigh, J. (2019). Mathematics in everyday life (2nd ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Hakim, N., Apriyanto, Mardiati, & Sitepu, E. (2024). Implementation of the realistic mathematics education (RME) approach in geometry learning in secondary schools. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.62872/y2rh7g04
Hohenwarter, M., Hohenwarter, J., Kreis, Y., & Lavicza, Z. (2011, July). Teaching and learning calculus with free dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-11), Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Jelatu, S., Sariyasa, & Ardana, I. M. (2018). Effect of GeoGebra-aided REACT strategy on understanding of geometry concepts. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11421a
Kamsurya, R. (2020). Learning evaluation of mathematics during the pandemic period COVID-19 in Jakarta. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8439
Karataş, H., & Fer, S. (2009). Evaluation of English curriculum at Yıldız Technical University using CIPP model. Egitim ve Bilim, 34(153), 47–60.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2007a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang standar sarana dan prasarana untuk SD/MI, SMP/MTs, dan SMA/MA. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2007b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 16 Tahun 2007 tentang standar kualifikasi akademik dan kompetensi guru. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Kairuddin, Samosir, M. I., Sitorus, G. E., Sihotang, H. M. W., & Tanjung, J. Y. (2024). Penerapan media pembelajaran menggunakan papan peluang, dadu, dan multimedia pembelajaran interaktif dengan pendekatan RME di SMA Swasta PAB 8 Saentis Percut. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 6(2), 585-594. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v6i2.7821
Muah, T. (2022). Penerapan pendekatan pembelajaran realistic mathematics education (RME) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika materi segiempat. Paedagogia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 25(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v25i2.64545
Muliyardi. (2002). Strategi pembelajaran matematika. FMIPA UNP.
Mulyawati, K. I., & Umam, K. (2019). Conceptual understanding and mathematical representation analysis of realistic mathematics education based on personality types. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.4605
Mustadi, A., Wibowo, S. E., Zubaidah, E., Supartinah, Sugiarsih, S., & Sayekti, O. M. (2024). Needs analysis of project-based teaching module development in the independent curriculum. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 12(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v12i1.66933
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/PtA/
Peraturan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2004). Peraturan Dirjen Dikdasmen No. 506/C/PP/2004 tentang indikator pemahaman konsep matematis siswa. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Retnawati, H., & Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Universitas Terbuka.
Salsabilla, I. I., Jannah, E., & Juanda. (2023). Analisis modul ajar berbasis kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Literasi dan Pembelajaran Indonesia, 3(1), 33–41.
Simangunsong, J., & Mustikaningsih, H. (2022). An evaluation of the implementation of study-from-home policy in senior high school during COVID-19 pandemic. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 8(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v8i1.36734
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human service evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 279–317). Kluwer Academic.
Subadre, W., Jufri, A. W., & Karta, I. W. (2023). Pengaruh sarana prasarana dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam pembelajaran terhadap mutu pendidikan di sekolah menengah pertama negeri Kabupaten Lombok Utara tahun 2022. JPAP (Jurnal Praktisi Administrasi Pendidikan), 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpap.v7i1.504
Sutherland, R. (2007). Teaching for learning mathematics. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Tuna, H., & Başdal, M. (2021). Curriculum evaluation of tourism undergraduate programs in Turkey: A CIPP model-based framework. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100324
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc
Widyastuti, N. S., & Pujiastuti, P. (2014). Pengaruh pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia (PMRI) terhadap pemahaman konsep dan berpikir logis siswa. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 2(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v2/2.2718
Wijaya, A. (2012). Pendidikan matematika realistik: Suatu alternatif pendekatan pembelajaran matematika. Graha Ilmu
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Farizal Ramadhan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.