Pengembangan Pedoman Dan Kit Praktikum Kimia Inovatif Berbasis Problem Based Learning
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v15i5.2008Published:
2020-11-30Issue:
Vol. 15 No. 5 (2020): Edisi Khusus Penelitian Pengembangan Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pengajaran MIPAKeywords:
Pedoman Praktikum, Kit Praktikum, Problem Based LearningArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan pedoman dan kit praktikum kimia berbasis PBL dan efek penggunaan pedoman serta kit praktikum kimia terhadap hasil belajar kognitif, sikap, dan keterampilan siswa kelas X SMA/MA. Desain penelitian menggunakan model ADDIE dan implementasi menggunakan desain one shot case study.ÃÂ Sampel yang diambil menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen berupa lembar uji kelayakan pedoman dan kit praktikum, tes, lembar observasi keterampilan dan sikap. Pedoman dan kit praktikum dinyatakan layak berdasarkan isi, bahasa, kegrafikan dan penyajian. Pedoman dan kit praktikum kimia kelas X semester genap efektif digunakan dalam pembelajaran karena hasil uji menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar kognitif, sikap dan keterampilan siswa rata-rata masing-masing 81,82, 81,56 dan 81,59 lebih tinggi dari pada nilai KKM yaitu 75,00.
References
Irby, S.M., Phu, A.L., Borda, E.J., Haskell, T.R., Steed, N., and Meyer, Z.. (2016). Use of a card sort task to assess studentsââ¬â¢ ability to coordinate three levels of representation in chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17(2), 337ââ¬â352.
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry ââ¬Ëtriplet. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 33(2), 179ââ¬â195.
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2008). An evaluation of a teaching intervention to promote studentsââ¬â¢ ability to use multiple levels of representation when describing and explaining chemical reactions. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 237-248.
Supriadi, S., Ibnu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2018). Analisis model mental mahasiswa pendidikan kimia dalam memahami berbagai jenis reaksi kimia. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 13(1), 1-5.
Becker, N., Stanford, C., Towns, M., and Cole, R. (2015). Translating across macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic levels: The role of instructor facilitation in an inquiry-oriented physical chemistry class. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16(4), 769ââ¬â785.
Chittleborough, G., and Treagust, D. (2008). Correct interpretation of chemical diagrams requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Res. Sci. Educ., 38(4), 463ââ¬â482.
Abrahams,I., Reiss, M. J., and Sharpe, R. M.. (2013). The assessment of practical work in school science. Stud. Sci. Educ., 49(2), 209ââ¬â251.
Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2013). Phenomenographic study of studentsââ¬â¢ manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school. Jurnal Teknologi, 63(2).
Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education : thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research Laboratory activities have long had a distinctive and central role in the science to quote from Ira Ramsen ( 1846-1927 ). Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 5(3), 247ââ¬â264.
Hofstein, A., and Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Sci. Educ., 88(1), 28ââ¬â54.
Shah, I. (2004). Making university laboratory work in chemistry more effective (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow).
Bradley, J. D. (2016). Achieving the aims of school practical work with microchemistry. African J. Chem. Educ., 6(1), 2ââ¬â16.
Cheung, D and Yip, D. Y. (2004). How science teachersââ¬â¢ concerns about school-based assessment of practical work vary with time: The Hong Kong experience. Int. J. Phytoremediation, 22(2), 153ââ¬â169.
Mardhiya, J., Silaban, R., & Mahmud, M. (2017, October). Analysis of Chemistry Laboratory Implementation in Senior High School. In 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2017). Atlantis Press.
Murphy, M., Redding, S., & Twyman, J. (Eds.). (2014). The Handbook on Innovations in Learning. IAP.
Hanson, R., & Acquah, S. (2014). Enhancing concept understanding through the use of micro chemistry equipment and collaborative activities. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(12), 120-130.
Skoumios, M. (2009). The Effect of Sociocognitive Conflict on Students' Dialogic Argumentation about Floating and Sinking. International journal of environmental and science education, 4(4), 381-399.
Prasetyo, A. P. B., & Susanti, R. (2016). Profesionalitas Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi: Studi Kasus Sekolah Menengah Atas Swasta Katolik Bhaktyarsa Maumere. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 5(2), 152-162.
Zakaria, Z., Latip, J., and Tantayanon, S. (2012). Organic Chemistry Practices for Undergraduates using a Small Lab Kit. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 59, 508ââ¬â514.
Author Biographies
Julia Mardhiya, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Ramlan Silaban, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Mahmud Mahmud, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semar
License
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
