Pengembangan Rubrik Keterampilan Praktik dan Sikap Ilmiah pada Praktikum Biokimia: Kajian Validitas dan Reliabilitas

Authors

Yunita Arian Sani Anwar , Eka Junaidi , Syarifa Wahidah Al Idrus

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v16i1.2347

Published:

2021-01-20

Issue:

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021

Keywords:

Keterampilan Praktik, Sikap Ilmiah, Validitas, Reliabilitas, Praktikum Biokimia

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Anwar, Y. A. S., Junaidi, E., & Al Idrus, S. W. (2021). Pengembangan Rubrik Keterampilan Praktik dan Sikap Ilmiah pada Praktikum Biokimia: Kajian Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v16i1.2347
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen keterampilan praktik dan sikap ilmiah dalam kegiatan laboratorium mata pelajaran biokimia.àPenilaian instrumen diawali dengan expert judgement menggunakan analisis indeks Aiken untuk validasi, dan Interclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) untuk uji reliabilitas.àInstrumen yang valid diujikan kepada 123 responden dan dianalisis menggunakan korelasi item-total korelasi dan Cronbach's alpha dengan menggunakan program software SPSS versi 21.àPada rubrik keterampilan praktis terdapat 18 indikator dan 44 pernyataan dalam angket sikap ilmiah yang dinyatakan valid oleh para ahli sebagai instrumen, dan memiliki reliabilitas sedang.àUji coba pada responden menunjukkan bahwa rubrik keterampilan praktik dan sikap ilmiah memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik untuk menilai kegiatan laboratorium pada mata kuliah biokimia.àInstrumen ini diharapkan dapat memudahkan penilaian pada pembelajaran biokimia di laboratorium.

References

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2014). Higher Education Curriculum. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: Jakarta.

Pala A. (2011). The need for character education. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(2), 1-23.

Davis M. Whatââ¬â¢s wrong with character education? (2003). American Journal of Education, 110, 32-37.

Hoge J. (2002). Character education, citizenship education, and the social studies. Social Studies, 93(3), 103-108.

Almerico G.M. (2014). Building character through literacy with childrenââ¬â¢s literature. Research in Higher Education Journal, 26, 1-13.

Kamaruddin S.A. (2012). Character education and students social behavior. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 223-230.

Varghese J., Faith M., & Jacob, M. (2012). Impact of E-Resources on Learning in Biochemistry: First-Year Medical Students Perceptions. BMC Medical Education, 12(21), 1ââ¬â9.

Anwar, Y.A.S., Junaidi, E., & Al Idrus S.W. (2013). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Biokimia Mahasiswa dalam Upaya Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Daur Belajar Johnston. PAEDAGORIA Jurnal Kajian Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 8(2), 71 ââ¬â74.

Broman K., Ekborg, M., & Johnels. (2011). Chemistry in crisis? Perspectives on teaching and learning chemistry in Swedish upper secondary schools. Nordina, 7(1), 43-53.

Thomas, G.P., & Anderson, D. (2014). Changing the Metacognitive Orientation of a Classroom Environment to Enhance Studentsââ¬â¢ Metacognition Regarding Chemistry Learning. Learning Environment Research, 17, 139ââ¬â155.

Anwar, Y.A.S., Senam., Laksono, E.W. (2016). Development of Mini Laboratory Model for Biochemistry Learning. Not Publication.

Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The Role Laboratory Work ini University Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172ââ¬â185.

Pickering, M. (1987). What goes on in studentsââ¬â¢ heads in laboratory? Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 521-523.

Hofstein, A, Kipnis, M, & Kind, P. (2008). Learning in and from Science Laboratories: Enhancing Students Meta-Cognition and Argumentation Skills. Science Education Issues and Development, 1, 59ââ¬â94.

Adeyemo, S.A. (2010). The need for skill development/acquisition in science technology and mathematics education (STEM) in Nigeria. Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 1(1), 1ââ¬â9.

Kumar A. (2010). Assessment of practical skill in science. New Delhi: Central Board of Secondary Education.

Opong I.K. (1981). Science Education in Primary Schools: Toe Product of Science or The Way to Science. Journal Science Teachers Association of Nigeria,19(2), 9ââ¬â17.

Jancirani, R., Dhevakrishnan, R., & Devi, S. (2012). A Study on Scientific Attitude of Adolescence Students in Namakkal District. Int Edu E-Journal, 1(4), 2ââ¬â8.

Kaur G. (2013). Scientific Attitude In Relation To Critical Thinking Among Teachers. Educationia Confab, 2(8), 24ââ¬â29.

Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian: Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Widhiarso, W. (2005). Mengestimasi Reliabilitas. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM.

Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21: Update PLS Regresi. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

Sheeba, M.N. (2013). An anatomy of science process skills in the light of the challenges to realize science instruction leading to global excellence in education. Educationia Confab, 2(4), 108ââ¬â123.

Rayner, G., Familari, M., & Blanksby, T. (2014). Assessing first year biology student practical skill: Benchmarking across the landscape. Refereed paper, 1ââ¬â10.

Chabalengula, V.M., Mumba, F., & Mbewe, S. (2012). How pre-service teachers: Understand and perform science process skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 167ââ¬â176.

Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(3), 247ââ¬â264.

Anthonia, N.U. (2014). Factorial validation of an instrument for the assessment of practical chemistry skills acquisition. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(8), 175-185.

P. Chijioke O, Okeke Benchuks. (2012). Development and validation of instrument for assessing practical skills in fault diagnoses and repairs of radio and television systems in Nigerian Techincal College. Am.J.Sci.Ind.Res., 3(3), 181-190.

Kaletapwa, G.F., Kesiki, W.B., & Amuche, C.I. (2014). Development and standardization of an instrument for assessing practicals among students in colleges of agriculture in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6), 399-414.

Sakiyo, J. (2009). Development and standardization of biology achievement test for SSS student in Adamawa state. Journal of Technology and Development, 11, 78-83.

Shah, Z.A., & Mahmood, N. (2011). Developing a scale to measure attitude towards science learning among school students. Bulletin of Education and Research, 33(1), 71-81.

Safdar, M, & Shah, I. (2014). The application of meaningful learning model of David Ausubel in teaching physics. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 35-42.

Moore, R.W., & Foy, R.L.H. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: a revision (SAI II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 327-336.

Author Biographies

Yunita Arian Sani Anwar, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

Eka Junaidi, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

Syarifa Wahidah Al Idrus, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

License

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).