Development of learning devices based on discovery learning model on global warming topic to improve student learning motivation and outcome
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v16i4.2845Published:
2021-09-04Issue:
Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021): September 2021Keywords:
Discovery Learning, Learning Devices, Research and Development, ADDIE, Learning Motivation and OutcomeArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to develop learning devices based on a discovery learning model on global warming topics that are feasible to improve student physics learning motivation and outcome. The research is a research and development study with the ADDIE model standing for Analyze, Design, Development, Implement, and Evaluate. The developed research instruments are syllabus, Lesson Plan (LP), Student Worksheet (SW), learning video, and test instrument. Meanwhile, data collection instruments include a validation sheet, motivation questionnaire, along pre-test and post-test sheets. Paired sample T-test was used to assess the comparative hypothesis of the two samples' average. The research instruments were developed at the Department of Physics Education Laboratory, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram and applied in XI MIA 1 class of State Madrasah Aliyah 1 Mataram. Those instruments were syllabus, LP, SW, and test instruments. The developed learning devices based on the discovery learning model were assessed by three expert validators, physics lecturers, resulting in learning devices with "very good" criteria. Hence, the learning devices based on the discovery learning model were feasible to be applied to improve student physics learning motivation and outcome. Based on the implementation of learning devices at State Madrasah Aliyah 1 Mataram, student physics learning motivation was increased by 0.53. In contrast, student physics learning outcome on global warming was improved by 0.47; therefore, both were categorized as "medium". According to paired sample t-test using SPSS 22, the physics learning outcome was 0.000 < 0.005 indicating a significant difference between before and after the learning treatment on students.
References
Helmi, F., Rokhmat, J., ââ¬ËArdhuha, J. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Berpikir Kausalitik Berscaffolding Tipe 2b Termodifikasi Berbantuan Lks Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fluida Dinamis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi.
Hariyanto, Agus. (2016). Pengaruh Discovery Learning Berbantuan Paket Program Simulasi PhET Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Volume.1 No. 3.
Ulfa, K., Buchori, A., dan Murtianto, Y. H. (2017). Efektifitas Model Guaided Discovery Learning Untuk Video Pembelajaran dalam Mengetahui Perbedaan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa. Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology. Volume.2, December 2017. Page 267-275.
Tohir, Muhammad. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun dibandingkan Tahun 2015. Situbondo: Ibrahimy University.
Hadi, Syamsul. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Proceedings of the National Seminar & Call for Papers, Mathematics Education Master Study Program, Siliwangi University, Tasikmalaya, January 19th, 2019. ISBN: 978-602-9250-39-8.
Lidiana. (2018). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Media Phet Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI SMAN 1 Kediri Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, Volume 4 No.1.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Tegeh, I.M., dan Kirna, I.M. (2013). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dengan ADDIE Model. Jurnal IKA. Vol 11 (1), 12-26.
Suyanto, Eko dan Sartinem. (2009). Pengembangan Contoh Lembar Kerja Fisika Siswa dengan Latar Penuntasan Bekal Awal Ajar Tugas Studi Pustaka dan Keterampilan Proses untuk SMA Negeri 3 Bandar Lampung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan 2009. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Setyosari, Punaji. (2013). Fourth edition Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Allo, Tangke, A.T., Jatmiko, B., Agustini, R. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Model Guided Discovery Learning Menggunakan Alat Sederhana untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya. ISSN: 2089-1776. Volume 5 No. 1.
Sundayana, Rostina (2014). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Mundilarto (2002). Kapita Selekta Pendidikan Fisika. Yogyakarta : FMIPA UNY.
Syahidu, Hairunisah. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Fisika. Mataram: Arga Puji Press.
Syahidu, C., Gunawan, Rokhmat, J., Rahayu, S. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berorientasi pada Kreativitas Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. Volume 4 No.1.
Sanjaya, Wina. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Irwan, S., Arsyad, M., Arafah, K. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Praktikum FisikaDasar Pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika UIN Alauddin Makasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. Volume 4 No.2.
Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skill for Effective Teaching. New York: Machmillan Publishing Company.
Sukardi. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Putri, H. R., Lesmono, A. D., Aristya, P. D. (2017). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa MAN Bondowoso. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika. Volume 6. No 2.
Author Biographies
Mega Safana, Mataram University
Muhammad Zuhdi, Mataram University
Jannatin ââ¬ËArdhuha, Mataram University
License
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).