Development of case-based learning model on biochemistry online learning
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i1.2992Published:
2022-01-15Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): January 2022Keywords:
Biochemistry, online learning, case-based learningArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the face-to-face learning process to online learning. It requires learning innovations that can make students more independent in exploring concepts. Case-based learning can be an alternative in the online learning process. This study aims to develop a case-based learning model in online biochemistry learning. This study uses six stages to modify the stages of development research. The results showed that the learning model developed consisted of five phases which became the syntax of the learning model developed, namely (1) Planning; (2) Orientation; (3) Organization; (4) Implementation; and (5) an evaluation developed following the results of the needs analysis. The developed syntax is described in model implementation guidelines and is equipped with learning tools. The validator's assessment shows that the model and device instructions have an index value of the expert agreement with a valid category. The test results on students showed that all the stages described in the guidelines could be implemented properly. Students gave a positive response to the implementation of case-based learning. Thus, case-based learning can be recommended for further learning.References
Viner, R. M., S. J. Russell, H. Croker, J. Packer, J. Ward, C. Stansfield, O. Mytton, C. Bonell, R. Booy. (2020). School closure and management practices during corona virus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 4, 397ââ¬â404.
Erduran, S. (2020). Science education in the era of a pandemic: how can history, philosophy and sociology of science contribute to education for understanding and solving the covid-19 crisis? Science & Education, 29, 233ââ¬â235.
Liberman-Martin A.L, & Ogba, O. M. (2020). Midsemester transition to remote instruction in a flipped college-level organic chemistry course. J Chem Educ, 97, 3188ââ¬â3193.
Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Xong, J., et al. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res, 287, 112934.
Lin, Y., McKeachie, W. & Kim, Y.C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learn Indiv Differ, 13, 251ââ¬â258.
Hsu, J.L. & Rowland-Goldsmith, M. (2020). Student perceptions of an inquirybased molecular biology lecture and lab following a mid-semester transition to online teaching. Biochem Mol Biol Educ, 1ââ¬â11.
Varghese, J., Faith, M., & Jacob, M. (2012). Impact of e-resources on learning in biochemistry: first-year medical students perceptions. BMC Medical Education, 12(21), 1-9.
Kaddoura, M.A. (2011). Critical thinking skills of nursing students in lecture-based teaching and case-based learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5 (2), 1ââ¬â18.
Chan, W. P., C.Y. Hsu, C. Y. Hong. (2008). Innovative ââ¬ÅCase-Based Integrated Teachingââ¬Â in an undergraduate medical curriculum: development and teachers' and students' responses. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 37, (11), 952ââ¬â956.
Dietrich, J.E., N. K. De Silva, A. E. Young. (2010). Reliability study for pediatric and adolescent gynecology case-based learning in resident education. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 23 (2), 102ââ¬â106.
Thibaut, D., & Schroeder, K.T. (2020). A case-based learning approach to online biochemistry labs during COVID-19. Biochem Mol Biol Educ., 48, 484ââ¬â485.
Millard, D.,Howard, Y,Gilbert L.,& Wills, G.(2009). Co-ìdesign and Co-ìdeployment Methodologies for Innovative m-ìLearning Systems. School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton.
Chester, V. (2011) Using clinical gait case studies to enhance learning in biomechanics. Biosci. Educ. 17, 51ââ¬â 84.
Kulak, V., & Newton, G. (2014). A guide to using case-based learning in biochemistry education. Biochem Mol Biol Educ., 42(6),457ââ¬â473.
Villafañe, S. M., Bailey, C. P., Loerstcher, J., Minderhout, V., and Lewis, J. E. (2011). Development and analysis of an instrument to assess student understanding of foundational concepts before Biochemistry coursework. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 39, 102ââ¬â 109.
Kulak, V., Newton, G., & Sharma, R. (2017). Does the use of case-based learning impact the retention of key concepts in undergraduate biochemistry? Int J High Educ., 6(2):110ââ¬â120.
Patil, V.S., Tiwale, S.M., Iyer, P., Venugopal, N.T., Kulkarni, C.S., & Kumbhar, A. (2017). A study of perception of first year MBBS students on case-based learning in biochemistry as a method to improve analytical thinking. Nat J Integr Res Med. 8(5), 67ââ¬â70.
Suhasini, P., Joshi, K.P., Swaroopachary, R.S., Yamini, D., & Sarma, D.V.H.S. (2017). An effective approach in learning clinical biochemistryââ¬âCase based learning. J Educ Technol Health Sci. 4(2), 62ââ¬â64.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: an introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Giannarou, L., & Zervas, E. (2014). Using delphi technique to build consensus in practice. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 9(2), 65-82.
Hackett, S., Masson, H., & Philips, S. (2006). Exploring consensus in practice with youth who are sexually abusive: findings from a delphi study of practitioner views in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Child Maltreatment, 11(2), 146-156.
Afshar, M., & Han, Z. (2014). Teaching and learning medical biochemistry: perspectives from a student and an educator. Medical Science Educator, 24(3), 339-341.
Fulton, T.B., Ronner, P., & Lindsley, J.E. (2012). Medical biochemistry in the era of competencies: is it time for Krebs cycle to go? Medical Science Educator, 22(1), 29-32.
Borrell, Y.J., A. M. Muñoz-Colmenero, E. Dopico, L. Miralles, E. Garcia-Vazquez. (2016). Food control and a citizen science approach for improving teaching of genetics in universities. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 44, 450ââ¬â462.
Fernández, S., L. J. RodrÃÂguez-Muñiz , J. Molina, L. Muñiz-RodrÃÂguez, J. Jiménez, E. GarcÃÂa-Vázquez, Y. J. Borrell. (2020). Lab experience with seafood control at the undergraduate level: Cephalopods as a case study. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 48 (3), 236-246.
Castro, M.D.B., & Tumibay, G.M.A. (2019). A literature review: efficacy of line learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Educ Inf Technol.
Ali, M., Yaacob, R.A.I.B.R., Endut, M.N.A.A.B., & Langove, N.U. (2017). Strengthening the academic usage of social media: An exploratory study. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 29(4), 553-561.
Hussin, W.N.T., Harun, J., & Shukor, N.A. (2019). Online interaction in social learning environment towards critical thinking skill: a framework. JOTSE, 9(1), 4-12.
Author Biographies
Yunita Arian Sani Anwar, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Mutiah Mutiah, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Syarifa Wahidah Al Idrus, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Eka Junaidi, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Rahmawati Rahmawati, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Fakultas KIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yunita Arian Sani Anwar, Mutiââ¬â¢ah Mutiââ¬â¢ah, Syarifa Wahidah Al Idrus, Eka Junaidi, Rahmawati Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
