VaR prediction for GARCH (1,1) model with normal and student-t error distribution

Authors

Novi Permata Indah , Dian Permata Sari , I Putu Eka Wijaya , Madjidainun Rahma

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v17i1.3215

Published:

2022-01-20

Issue:

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): January 2022

Keywords:

GARCH Model, Value at Risk, Coverage Probability

Articles

Downloads

Additional Files

How to Cite

Indah, N. P., Sari, D. P., Wijaya, I. P. E., & Rahma, M. (2022). VaR prediction for GARCH (1,1) model with normal and student-t error distribution. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i1.3215
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims at determining the estimated parameters of the GARCH (1.1) model establishing the prediction of the VaR value, and defining the accuracy of the VaR prediction. In this study, the error in the GARCH (1,1) model uses a normal distribution and student-t distribution. The research method focuses on parameter calculation and the prediction of VaR value within two aspects regarding analytic and numeric aspects. Analytically, the prediction of the VaR value and the accuracy of the prediction of VaR value through the VaR coverage opportunity. It isn't easy to estimate the parameters for the GARCH (1.1) model analytically. Thus, the parameters are estimated numerically using the Quansi Newton optimization method. Prediction of VaR value and VaR coverage probability will be simulated numerically by using stock return data of IBM, INDF.JK and GSPC. The results show that the GARCH (1.1) model can model stock returns for IBM, INDF.JK and GSPC. There is no significant difference between the GARCH (1,1) model with a normally distributed error and GARCH (1,1) with a student-t distribution error in determining the prediction of VaR values. The numerical simulation results show that the VaR value prediction using the GARCH (1,1) model with a normally distributed error is more accurate than the student-t-distributed error.

References

Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2021). Indeks, IDX. https://www.idx.co.id

Alexander, C. 2008. Pricing, Hedging and Tranding Financial Instrument. Jhon Wiley and Sons.

Franses, P. H., Vanderleij, M., & Paap, R. (1987). Asimple Test for GARCH Against A Stochastic Volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6. 291ââ¬â301.

Dennis, S. A., & Sim, A.B. (1999). Share Price Volatility with The Introduction of Individual Share Futures on The Sydney Futures Exchange. International Riview of Financial Analysis, 8(2). 153-163.

Hull, J., & White, A. (2000). Valuing Credit Default Swaps I: No Counterparty Default Risk. Journal of Derivatives, 8. 1-35.

McKenzie, M.D., Brailsford, T.J., & Faff, R.W. (2001). New Insights Into The Impact of The Introduction of Futures Tranding on Stock Price Volatility. The Journal of Futures Market, 21(3). 237-255.

Hung, M.W., Lee, C.F., & So, L.C. (2003). Impact of Foreign-listed Singel Stock Futures on The Domestic Underlying Stock Market. Applied Economics Letters, 10(9). 567-574.

Posedel, P. (2005). Properties and Estimation of GARCH(1,1) Model. Metodoloski Zvezki, 2. 243ââ¬â257.

Tsay, R. 2005. Analysis of Financial Time Series. John Wiley and Sons.

Cont, R. (2001). Empirical Properties of Asset Return: Stylized Facts and Statistical Issue. Quantitative Finance, 1. 223ââ¬â23

Enggel, R. F., Patton, A.J. (2001). What Good is A Model?. Quantitative Finance, 1. 237-245.

Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic. Journal of Econometrics, 31. 307ââ¬â327.

Floros, C. (2007). The Use of GARCH Model for The Calculation of Minimum Capital Risk Requirements: International Evidence. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 3(4). 360-371.

Beer, J. (2009). Changes in The Volatility Level and Structure of Shares Post Single Stock Futures Tranding. Journal Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(2). 296-310.

Bohl, M.T., Diesteldorf. J., & Siklos, P.L. (2015). China Economic Riview, 34. 207-224.

So, M. K. ., & Yu, P. L. (2006). Empirical Analysis of GARCH Models in Value at Risk Estimation. Journal of International Financial Market Institution and Money, 16. 180ââ¬â197.

Engle, R. F., & Bollerslev, T. (1986). Modeling The Persistence of Conditional Variance. Econometric Riview, 5. 1ââ¬â50.

Nelson, D. (1991). Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset return: a new approach. Econometrica, 59. 347ââ¬â370.

Wong, M.C.S., Cheng, W.Y., & Wong, C.Y.P. (2003). Market Risk Management of Bank: Implication from The Accuracy of Value-at-Risk Forecasts. Journal of Forcasting, 22(1). 23-33.

McNail, A.J., Frey, R., Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative Risk Management. United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.

Taylor, S.J. (2008). Modeling Financial Time Series. United States of America: Word Scientific Publising Co. Re. Ltd.

Author Biographies

Novi Permata Indah, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

I Putu Eka Wijaya, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Madjidainun Rahma, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

License

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).