The application of jigsaw cooperative learning model on the reaction rate material to train students metacognitive skills
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i1.3247Published:
2022-01-30Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): January 2022Keywords:
Cooperative Learning Model, Jigsaw, Metacognitive, Reaction Rate.Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to describe the implementation of the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model, student activities in the application of learning models, students' metacognitive skills, and student responses to the applied learning model. This research targets 34 students of class XI MIPA 5 SMAN 19 Surabaya with a One Group Pretest Posttest Design research design. The results obtained are 1) the learning model implementation obtained 96.42% and 99.52% with very good criteria. 2) The percentage of relevant student activities is greater than that of irrelevant students, namely 98.98% and 96.59%. 3) The students' metacognitive skills increased with the average gain score obtained belonging to the high criteria, including Planning Skills 0.90; Monitoring skills 0.82; and Evaluating skills 0.83. 4) Students' response to the applied learning model is good, where 93.3% of students respond positively.References
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitiveââ¬âdevelopmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
Azwar, S.(2011) Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya (Edisi 2). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wahdah, N. F., Jufri, A. W., & Zulkifli, L. (2016). Jurnal Belajar Sebagai Sarana Pengembangan Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(1)..
Apriadi, R., Andayani, Y., & Muntari, M. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Untuk Siswa Sma. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 13(2), 171-176.
Wilson, D. & Conyers M. (2016). Teaching Student to Drive Their Brains: Metacognitive Strategies, Activities, and Lesson Ideas. New York: Eastern Suffolk BOCES.
Anita, W. (2008). Educational Psychology, Active Learning Edition.
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. Routledge..
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Pulmones, R. (2007). Learning chemistry in a metacognitive environment. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 16(2), 165-183.
Haris, M., Muntari, M., & Loka, I. N. (2019). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Terpadu NHT dan TSTS Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Struktur Atom dan Sistem Periodik Unsur. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 14(3), 123-127..
Sudjana, N., & Rivai, A. (1990). Media Pengajaran: penggunaan dan pembuatannya. CV Sinar Baru, Bandung.
Depdiknas .(2003). Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003 , tentang sistem pendidikan nasional. Jakarta : Depdiknas.
Okumus, S., Koc, Y., & Doymus, K. (2019). Determining the Effect of Cooperative Learning and Models on the Conceptual Understanding of the Chemical Reactions. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 14(3), 154-177.
Sukarini, A., Susilowati, E., & Martini, K. S. (2013). Studi Komparasi Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Metode Jigsaw dan Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Koloid Kelas XI Semester 2 SMA Negeri 1 Wonogiri Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(3), 77-84.
Ismail, I. (2020). The Application of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model towards the Improvement of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Public Senior High School 15 Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 1113-1122.
Mahmuda, S., & Azizah, U. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Metakognitif pada Materi Asam Basa Kelas XI SMAN 1 Waru. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 9(3), 417-426.
Hasanah, I. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Dengan Strategi Metakognitif Maateri Koloid Kelas Xi Semester Genap Di Sman 2 Bangkalan (Implementation Of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model By Metacognitive Strategi On Subject Matter Of Koloid In Sman 2 Bangkalan). Unesa Journal Of Chemical Education, 5(3).
Malinda, W. F., & Azizah, U. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif NHT Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Metakognitif Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 4 Sidoarjo. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 8(2).
Azizah, U., & Nasrudin, H. (2018). Empowerment of metacognitive skills through development of instructional materials on the topic of hydrolysis and buffer solutions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 953, No. 1, p. 012199). IOP Publishing..
Arends, RI (2008). Learning to Teach. Buku I. Edisi Ketujuh. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Irawan, J., Hadi, S., Zulandri, Z., Jamaluddin, J., Syukur, A., & Hadisaputra, S. (2021). Validating metacognitive awareness inventory (MAI) in chemistry learning for senior high school: A rasch model analysis. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(4), 442-448.
Author Biographies
Dini Madiar, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Utiya Azizah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
License
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
