Analysis of student mathematical investigations ability on transformation geometry in terms of cognitive style
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i5.3391Published:
2022-09-30Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 5 (2022): September 2022Keywords:
Mathematical Investigation, Cognitive Style, Reflektive and ImpulsiveArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Mathematical investigation is an activity that can encourage an experimental activity, collect data, make observations, identify patterns, make and test conjectures and make generalizations used to improve skills and develop students' mathematical thinking processes optimally. Different cognitive styles can affect students' ability to think and reason, especially in solving mathematical investigative problems. Therefore, this paper will examine mathematical investigations' ability in reflective and impulsive cognitive styles in qualitative descriptive analysis. The subjects in eleventh-grade senior high school at SMA Negeri 2 Mataram, Indonesia. Students were selected using a purposive sampling technique, and six students were selected as subjects in the interview consisting of three reflective students and three impulsive students. The instruments used are mathematical investigation tests, Matching Familiar Figure MFFT tests, and interview guidelines. The results showed that students with a reflective cognitive style were more thorough and systematic in writing down the answers to each point and always thought first in solving problems. Most students went through 4 stages of mathematical investigations: specialization, conjecture, generalization, and justification. While students with impulsive cognitive styles mostly managed to go through 3 stages of mathematical investigations, specialization, conjecture, and generalization, due to a lack of accuracy in solving questions and providing as simple answers as possible according to the question request.
References
Turmudi. (2008). Landasan Filsafat dan Teori Pembelajaran Matematika Paradigma Eksploratif dan Investigatif. Jakarta: Leuser Cita Pustaka.
Hoadley, S. (2020). The concept of competitive productivity (CP): a linguistic investigation. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management.
Subarinah, S. (2021). Pemecahan Masalah dan Investigasi Matematik. Mataram: Penerbit Duta Pustaka Ilmu.
Amin, A., Arsyad, N., & Minggi, I. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Investigasi Matematika melalui Pemberian Proyek Matematika pada siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 2 Watampone. Beta , 8, 30.
Subarinah, S., Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2018). Profil Proses Kognitif Siswa SMP dalam Investigasi Matematik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan , 3, 15-23.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically. London: Pearson Education Limited
Yeo, J. B. W. & Yeap, B. H. (2010). Characterizing the cognitive processes in the mathematical investigation. Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning ISSN 1473-0111.
Nivera, G. C. (2012). Mathematical Investigation and Its Assessment: Implications for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. The Normal Lights, 6(1), 29-43
Desmita. (2011). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bassey, Sam. W & Umoren, G. (2009). Bassey, S. W., Umoren, G., & Udida, L. A. (2007, February). Cognitive styles, secondary school students’ attitude and academic performance in chemistry in Akwa Ibom State-Nigeria. In Proceedings of epiSTEME 2-International Conference to Review Research in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, India.
Kagan, J. (1965). Impulsive and Reflective Children: Significance of Conceptual Tempo. Dalam Krumboltz, J.D (Eds.) Learning and the Educational Process. (hlm 133-161), Chicogo. Rand Mc Nally & Company.
Rozencwajg, P., & Corroyer, D. (2005). Cognitive Processes in the Reflective-Impulsive Cognitive Style. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2005, 166(4), 451 – 463.
Kagan, J. dan Kogan, N. (1970) Individual Variation in Cognitive Process. Dalam Mussan, P. (Edt.) Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology (3rd ed. Vol. 1) Wiley New York
Warli. (2013). Kreativitas Siswa SMP yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif atau Impulsif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran , 20, 190-201.
Edwards, LD. (1997). "Explore Ring the Terrority before Proof: Students' Generalization in a computer Microworld for Transformation Geometry". International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,1:187-215.
Clements, D. H. & Burns, B. A. (2000). "Students' development of strategies for turn and angle measure". Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 31-45.
Rollick, M. B. (2009). Towards a Definition of Reflection. Mathematics Teaching in The Middle School , 14.
Arikunto. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Moleong. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Prayitno, S. (2019). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Mataram: Duta Pustaka Ilmu.
Fauziah, N., Hakim, A., & Andayani, Y. (2019). Meningkatkan literasi sains peserta didik melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah berorientasi green chemistry pada materi laju reaksi. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 14(2), 31-35.
Rahmatina, S., Sumarmo, U., & Johar, R. (2014). Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika , 62-70
Author Biographies
Nina Muthmainnah, Mathematics Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Univesity of Mataram
Sri Subarinah, Mathematics Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Univesity of Mataram
Amrullah Amrullah, Mathematics Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Univesity of Mataram
Arjudin Arjudin, Mathematics Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Univesity of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nina Muthmainnah, Sri Subarinah, Amrullah Amrullah, Arjudin Arjudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
