Development of live worksheets assisted diagnostic assessment instruments to measure understanding of science concepts prospective elementary school teachers

Authors

Hasnawati Hasnawati , Muhammad Syazali , Arif Widodo

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v17i6.4217

Published:

2022-11-30

Issue:

Vol. 17 No. 6 (2022): November 2022

Keywords:

Understanding of Scientific Concepts, Diagnostic Assessments, Liveworksheets.

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Hasnawati, H., Syazali, M. ., & Widodo, A. . (2022). Development of live worksheets assisted diagnostic assessment instruments to measure understanding of science concepts prospective elementary school teachers. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(6), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i6.4217

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Understanding the material's content is one of the main competencies a teacher must possess, so it is necessary to diagnose the extent of understanding the level of understanding of science concepts for prospective teachers. This study aims to produce a valid and practical diagnostic assessment instrument assisted by live worksheets to measure the level of understanding of science concepts for elementary school teacher candidates. This research is development research using a 4-D model (define, design, develop and disseminate). In the define stage, science concepts that are difficult to understand for prospective elementary school teacher students have been identified, namely the material of temperature and heat, electricity, magnetic fields, and the solar system. The next stage is to design the right instrument to diagnose the level of understanding of science concepts for elementary school teacher candidates, namely a diagnostic instrument with three-level multiple choice questions integrated into the live worksheet application. Furthermore, in the development stage, the questions pay attention to the final abilities expected to be achieved in students based on the semester learning plans for special science education courses on materials identified at an early stage. The instrument that has been developed is then tested for validity and practicality. The validity test results obtained an average score of 3.8 which means the instrument is very valid, and the results of the practicality test show a practical instrument with an average score of 3.5. The final stage of this research is dissemination, namely the process of disseminating research and development products in the form of diagnostic assessment instruments assisted by live worksheets to measure the level of understanding of the science concepts of elementary school teacher candidates that have been developed. In conclusion, the live worksheet-assisted diagnostic assessment instrument developed is valid and practical for measuring the level of understanding of elementary school teacher candidates.

References

Kusdiyanti, H., Zanky, M. N., & Wati, A. P. (2021, April). HYLBUS (Hybrid Learning Based on Asynchoronous Learning Network): Inovation of Learning Model for Hight School to be up Againts Industrial Revolution 4.0. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1807, No. 1, p. 012003). IOP Publishing.

da Silva, S. S., Spers, R. G., Suárez, L. V., & Ramírez, C. P. (2022). Evolution of Blended Learning and its Prospects in Management Education. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 7(1), 1.

Zhang, J., Ding, Y., Yang, X., Zhong, J., Qiu, X., Zou, Z., ... & Zheng, Y. (2022). COVID-19’s impacts on the scope, effectiveness, and interaction characteristics of online learning: A social network analysis. Plos one, 17(8), e0273016.

Alzahrani, M. (2022). Traditional Learning Compared to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned From Faculty’s Perspectives. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221091720.

Sousa, A. (2021). Dialogue in Online Learning Spaces: How Transitioning to Online Learning during a Pandemic Impacts Critical Classroom Dialogue and Inclusivity. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(1).

Lim, L. T. S., Regencia, Z. J. G., Dela Cruz, J. R. C., Ho, F. D. V., Rodolfo, M. S., Ly-Uson, J., & Baja, E. S. (2022). Assessing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, shift to online learning, and social media use on the mental health of college students in the Philippines: A mixed-method study protocol. Plos one, 17(5), e0267555.

Rodrigues, M. W., Isotani, S., & Zarate, L. E. (2018). Educational Data Mining: A review of evaluation process in the e-learning. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 1701-1717.

Harvey, L. (2002). Evaluation for what?. Teaching in higher education, 7(3), 245-263.

Edelenbos, J., & Van Buuren, A. (2005). The learning evaluation: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Evaluation review, 29(6), 591-612.

Fatwa, M. W., Harjono, A., & Jamaluddin, J. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Dan Penguasaan Konsep Sains Ditinjau Dari Pengetahuan Awal Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 4(1), 121-130.

Yulmasita Bagou, D., & Suking, A. (2020). Analisis Kompetensi Profesional Guru. Jambura Journal of Educational Management, 1(2), 122-130.

Rafsanjani, M. A., Pamungkas, H. P., Laily, N., & Prabowo, A. E. (2022). Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Readiness and Satisfaction among Indonesian Students. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 149-165.

Cigognini, M. E., & Di Stasio, M. (2022). Formative Assessment. From pandemic practices to sustainable perspective through active learning approaches. Form@ re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 22(2), 91-110.

Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2022). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre-service teachers in a TPACK-practical course. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3495-3528.

Yalyn, D., Sari, D. A. P., & Widodo, W. (2022). The implementation of student worksheets based on problem-based learning to improve students science process skill. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(5), 569-576.

Sulung, M. H., & Erman, E. (2022). Science teachers innovation in overcoming learning challenges during Pandemic Covid-19: A Reflection. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(5), 560-568.

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.

Yamtinah, S., & Budiyono, B. (2015). Pengembangan instrumen diagnosis kesulitan belajar pada pembelajaran kimia di SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 69-81.

Sartika, P. F., Susilo, H., & Sulisetijono, S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Diagnostik untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Jaringan Tumbuhan dan Hewan Pada Siswa Sma/Ma Di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 70-76.

Handayeni, T., Artayasa, I. P., & Rasmi, D. A. C. (2021). Developing online learning video based on the science technology society (STS) to improve biology learning outcomes. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 16(4), 473-478.

Author Biographies

Hasnawati Hasnawati, Elemntary School Teacher Department, FKIP University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Muhammad Syazali, Elemntary School Teacher Department, FKIP University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Arif Widodo, Elemntary School Teacher Department, FKIP University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Hasnawati Hasnawati, Muhammad Syazali, Arif Widodo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.