Analysis of independence and creative thinking skills of students through assignment

Authors

Kusmiyati Kusmiyati

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v17i6.4232

Published:

2022-11-30

Issue:

Vol. 17 No. 6 (2022): November 2022

Keywords:

Independence, Creative Thinking, Assignment

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Kusmiyati, K. (2022). Analysis of independence and creative thinking skills of students through assignment. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(6), 754–758. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i6.4232

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' independence and creative thinking skills through assignments. The subjects of this research are Biology Education students who take the Nutrition Science elective course as many as 20 people. Independence and creative thinking data were collected using an instrument with a Likert scale. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively into five categories. The results of the independence analysis showed as many as 16 students (80%) in the very good category and 4 students (20%) in the good category. The results of the creative thinking analysis showed as many as 13 students (65%) in the very good category and 7 students (35%) in the good category. It can be concluded that most of the students completing lecture assignments have independence and creative thinking skills in the very good category. The achievement of independence on the indicators of not depending on others, self-confidence, self-initiative, and self-control, each student varied from fairly good, good, and very good categories. Meanwhile, the achievement of independence for the indicators of discipline and responsibility varies in the good and very good categories. (c) The achievement of all indicators of students' creative thinking skills varies in the very good and good categories. The very good category was mostly achieved by students on the indicators of flexible and original thinking skills. In contrast, students mostly achieved the good category on the indicators of evaluation thinking skills.

References

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2003, Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Wati, S., Al Idrus, A., & Syukur, A. (2021). Analysis of student scientific literacy: study on learning using ethnoscience integrated science teaching materials based on guided inquiry. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(5), 624-630.

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences. A Global Cities Education Network Report. New York, Asia Society, 10.

Hidayati, K., & Listyani, E. (2010). Pengembangan instrumen kemandirian belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(1).

Munandar, U. (2020). Mengembangkan bakat dan kreativitas anak sekolah. Jakarta: Grasindo

Haryanti, Y. D., & Saputra, D. S. (2019). Instrumen penilaian berpikir kreatif pada pendidikan abad 21. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5(2), 58-64.

Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian Suatu Pendekatan pratek. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta

Sa’diyah, R. (2017). Pentingnya melatih kemandirian anak. Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, 16(1), 31-46.

Busdayu, Z. A., Artayasa, I. P., & Kusmiyati, K. (2021). The effect of implementation of animated video on online learning during the covid-19 pandemic on students science learning outcomes. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 16(4), 498-504.

Muhtadi. (2019). Pembelajaran digital. PPG Jakarta

People, H. (2020). Internet. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.

Ihsan, M. S., & Jannah, S. W. (2021). Development of interactive multimedia based on blended learning to improve student science literacy during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(4), 438-441.

Listiana, N., Setiadi, D., & Kusmiyati, K. (2022). Analysis of student responses to online learning in biology subjects at Senior High School of Central Lombok. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(4), 469-474.

Darmawan, E., Ismirawati, N., Ristanto, R. H., & Rumah, P. P. (2021). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Penerbit Pustaka Rumah C1nta.

Li, Y., Tian, M., Liu, G., Peng, C., & Jiao, L. (2020). Quantum optimization and quantum learning: A survey. Ieee Access, 8, 23568-23593.

Gani, A. R. F., & Arwita, W. (2020). Kecenderungan Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa Baru Pada Mata Kuliah Morfologi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 8(2).

Ratnah, R., Wildan, W., & Muntari, M. (2022). The practicality of problem-based learning tools assisted by interactive simulations to improve students' creative thinking ability. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(3), 347-352.

Pratiwi, A. K., Makhrus, M., & Zuhdi, M. (2021). The effectiveness of learning media based on the guided inquiry model to improve students science literature skills and scientific attitudes. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(5), 636-639.

Hidayat, R., Syed Zamri, S. N. A., Zulnaidi, H., Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Adnan, M. (2021). The Interrelationships between Metacognition and Modeling Competency: The Moderating Role of The Academic Year. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1853-1866.

Andrian, Y., & Rusman, R. (2019). Implementasi pembelajaran abad 21 dalam kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 12(1), 14-23.

Jufri, W. (2013). Belajar dan pembelajaran sains. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Author Biography

Kusmiyati Kusmiyati, Biology Education Deparment, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education University of Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Kusmiyati Kusmiyati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.