The effectiveness of english teaching materials based on content and language-integrated learning (CLIL) to increase the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of prospective biology teachers
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v18i1.4573Published:
2023-01-30Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to examine the use of English in the Biology handbook through a learning approach based on Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) to increase the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for prospective teacher students in the Biology Education Study Program at the University of Mataram. This research was conducted using a quasi-experimental approach with multiple group pre-test and post-test patterns. The test subjects and units of analysis were all second-semester students taking English for Biology courses at the FKIP Biology Education Study Program in the 2021/2022 academic year consisting of 6 classes, namely A, B, C, D, E, and F. TPACK data were analyzed using the N-gain. The N-gain test is used to measure the difference between the post-test and the pre-test. Based on the results of data analysis, it is known that there is an increase in students' TPACK ability to get N-gain values of 91%, 56%, 67%, 64%, 66%, and 61% for classes A, B, C, D, E, and F. The average value of N-gain for TPACK of biology education students is 68, which is quite effective. Therefore, it can be concluded that the English handbook through a CLIL-based learning approach contributes quite effectively to increasing the TPACK of prospective Biology teacher students.
Keywords:
Teaching Materials, CLIL, TPACK, StudentsReferences
Young, J., Young, J., & Shaker, Z. (2012). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Literature Using Confidence Intervals. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 56(5).
Etkina, E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high school physics teachers. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020110.
Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186-210.
Moghadam, N. Z., & Fatemipour, H. (2014). The effect of CLIL on vocabulary development by Iranian secondary school EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2004-2009.
Kutaka-Kennedy, J. (2015). A proposed model to increase creativity, collaboration and accountability in the online classroom. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(11), 873.
Ersanli, C. Y. (2016). Improving technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service English language teachers. International Education Studies, 9(5), 18-27.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of research on technology in education, 41(4), 393-416.
Hurajova, A. (2019). Contribution of CLIL Methodology to the Development of Bilingualism and Bilingual Language Competence of Slovak Secondary-School Students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 905-919.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
Yang, W., & Gosling, M. (2014). What makes a Taiwan CLIL programme highly recommended or not recommended?. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(4), 394-409.
Jufri, W. A. (2021). English for Biology.
Pérez, M. L., & Malagón, C. G. (2017). Creating materials with ICT for CLIL lessons: A didactic proposal. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 633-637.
Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70-88.
Ningsih, T. (2022). Inovasi Pembelajaran Ips Melalui Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Tpack). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 8(4), 1385-1395.
Muhtadi, D., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Hidayah, I., & Suyitno, A. (2022, September). Transformasi Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge Calon Guru dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (PROSNAMPAS) (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 251-257).
Hudson, P. (2009). Learning to teach science using English as the medium of instruction. Eurasia Journal of mathematics, Science and technology Education, 5(2), 165-170.
Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., & Marandi, S. S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1632010.
An, Q., & Yang, Z. X. (2021). Developing and Validating a Technology Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework for Business English Teachers. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(5), 40-62.
RAO, V. C. S. Teaching Strategies Of English For Science And Technology (EST).
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences. A Global Cities Education Network Report. New York, Asia Society, 10.
Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Holistic Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24-31.
Chostelidou, D., & Griva, E. (2014). Measuring the effect of implementing CLIL in higher education: An experimental research project. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2169-2174.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aulia Dwi Amalina Wahab, A. Wahab Jufri, Nina Nisrina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
How to Cite
