Correlation in biological literacy and critical thinking skills of science students through problem-based learning model integrated by macromedia flash
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v18i3.4928Published:
2023-05-22Issue:
Vol. 18 No. 3 (2023): May 2023Keywords:
Biological Literacy, Critical Thinking, Problem-Based Learning, Macromedia FlashArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Biological literacy and critical thinking skills are two abilities students studying biology must possess. This study aimed to determine the correlation between biological literacy skills and critical thinking skills of class XI Science at Senior High School 1 Aikmel Through the Problem-Based Learning model integrated by Macromedia Flash. The research method is correlational research. The sample in this research were students of class XI Science 1 and XI Science 3 at Senior High School I Aikmel. The data analysis used in this study is a simple linear regression analysis. The results showed a relationship between biological literacy skills and critical thinking skills of class XI Science at Senior High School 1 Aikmel Through the Problem-Based Learning model integrated by Macromedia Flash. The value of the correlation coefficient (r) of biological literacy with critical thinking skills is 0.712 (high). The direct relationship between biological literacy and critical thinking skills is positive. The coefficient of determination (r2) is 50.8%. The regression line equation for the relationship between biological literacy and students' critical thinking skills in learning using the Problem-Based Learning model with Macromedia Flash is Y =43.847+0.568X.
References
Semilarski, H., & Laius, A. (2021). Exploring Biological Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review of Biological Literacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1181-1197.
Kampourakis, K., & Reiss, M. J. (Eds.). (2018). Teaching biology in schools: global research, issues, and trends. Routledge.
Susetyarini, E., & Fauzi, A. (2020). The trend of critical thinking skill researches in biology education journals across Indonesia: From research design to data analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 535-550.
UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UN.
Goodsett, M. (2020). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102163.
Butterworth, J., & Thwaites, G. (2013). Thinking skills: Critical thinking and problem-solving. Cambridge University Press.
Du, X., Emmersen, J., Toft, E., & Sun, B. (2013). PBL and Critical Thinking Disposition in Chinese Medical Students--A Randomized Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of problem-based Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 72-83.
Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198-206.
Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 213-220.
Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21-32.
Heard, J., Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Ramalingam, D., & Teo, I. (2020). Critical thinking: Skill development framework.
Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-20.
Anakara, H. R. S. (2021). Assessment of Biological Literacy Levels among Third-Grade Secondary School Students in Medina. International Education Studies, 14(7), 47-58.
Mulbar, U., & Bahri, A. (2021, February). Biology Science Literacy of Junior High School Students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1752, No. 1, p. 012084). IOP Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2021). Introduction to linear regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Rovai, A. P., Baker, J. D., & Ponton, M. K. (2013). Social science research design and statistics: A practitioner's guide to research methods and IBM SPSS. Watertree Press LLC.
Perry, R. (2019). Comparative analysis of nations: Quantitative Approaches. Routledge.
Fatmawati, H., Mardiyana, M., & Triyanto, T. (2014). Analisis berpikir kritis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan polya pada pokok bahasan persamaan kuadrat (penelitian pada siswa kelas X SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Sragen tahun pelajaran 2013/2014). Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(9).
Chi, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Won Han, S. (2018). Moderation of the effects of scientific inquiry activities on low SES students’ PISA 2015 science achievement by school teacher support and disciplinary climate in science classroom across gender. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1284-1304.
Juhji, J., & Mansur, M. (2020). Pengaruh literasi sains dan keterampilan berpikir kritis terhadap penguasaan konsep dasar biologi. EDUSAINS, 12(1), 113-122.
Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in science teaching, 28(8), 713-725.
Jufri, A. W., Hakim, A., & Ramdani, A. (2019, June). Instrument development in measuring the scientific literacy integrated character level of junior high school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1233, No. 1, p. 012100). IOP Publishing.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science education, 84(1), 71-94.
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364-377.
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580.
Shofawati, A., Widodo, W., & Sari, D. A. P. (2023). The use of multimedia interactive to improve students science literacy in the new normal era. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(1), 65-71.
Winkel, W. S. (2004). Psikologi Pengajaran [Teaching Psychology]. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT. Grasindo.
Alnofaie, H. (2013). A framework for implementing critical thinking as a language pedagogy in EFL preparatory programs. Thinking skills and creativity, 10, 154-158.
Is' ad, N., & Sukarmin, S. (2022). Implementation of problem-solving learning model assisted by student worksheets to improve critical thinking skills in the context of reaction rate. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 199-208.
Albitz, R. S. (2007). The what and who of information literacy and critical thinking in higher education. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(1), 97-109.
Listiani, I., Susilo, H., & Sueb, S. (2022). Relationship between Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking of Prospective Teachers. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 721-730.
Thorndahl, K. L., & Stentoft, D. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking and problem-based learning in higher education: A scoping review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1).
Almubaid, H. (2014). Applying and Promoting Critical Thinking in Online Education. In The International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace.
Humairoh, S., & Yonata, B. (2022). Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to train students' critical thinking skills on reaction rate topic. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 136-142.
White, T. K., Whitaker, P., Gonya, T., Hein, R., Kroening, D., Lee, K., ... & Hayes, E. (2009). The use of interrupted case studies to enhance critical thinking skills in biology. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 10(1), 25-31.
Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. Cengage learning.
Author Biography
Anindita SHM Kusuma, Biology Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anindita SHM Hangesti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
