The effect of the generative learning model on the student critical thinking ability in environmental conservation topic
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v18i4.5152Published:
2023-07-30Downloads
Abstract
The low level of students' critical thinking ability makes students need help understanding science concepts. The application of an interactive learning model can be a solution to this problem. This research aims to analyze the effect of the Generative learning model on the critical thinking ability of 7th graders in Environmental conservation Materials. The research method used is the Quasy Experiment method carried out in class VII junior high school SMP Mutiara Insani Tangerang. Students' critical thinking abilities are measured by a written test instrument in the form of essay questions made according to indicators of critical thinking ability that have been adjusted as many as ten questions tested for validity and reliability. The selected experimental class comes from a population that is normally distributed, has a homogeneous variance, and has the same mean. The research results show that the experimental class with the Generative Learning model and the control class with the Discovery Learning model are normally distributed. Hypothesis testing is done by t-test, and the significance level is based on the results of the Posttest; there is a significant influence of the Generative Learning learning model on the critical thinking ability of class VII students. In conclusion, the Generative Learning Learning Model affects the Critical Thinking Ability of 7th graders Students in Environmental Conservation material.
Keywords:
Critical Thinking Ability, Generative Learning, Environmental Conservation, Integrated ScienceReferences
Putra, P. D. (2015). Pengembangan Sistem ELearning untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika. Jurnal Fisika Indonesia, 45-49.
Alfonso, D. (2015). Evidence of Critical Thinking in High School Humanities Classrooms. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 26-44.
Sulistyowarni, P. (2019). The effectiveness of the OR-IPA teaching model to improve students' critical thinking ability in senior high school physics subject. Journal of Physics.
Firdaus, et. al. (2015). Developing Critical Thinking Ability of Students in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Education and Learning. 3, 226-236
Rizkia, A.D., et al (2022). Development of problem-solving-based test instruments to foster the student's creative thinking skills on environmental conservation. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 17(4), 447-454.
Bao L, H. K. (2002). Model analysis of fine structure of students models: an example with newtons third law. American Association of Physics Teachers, 83-91.
Zulkarnain. (2019). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis Peserta didik pada Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Preparing Dong Concluding. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 96-100.
Zaini. (2016). Guided Inquiry-based learning on the concept of ecosystem toward learning outcomes and critical thinking ability of high school students. Journal of research & method in education, 50-55.
Utami, T.P., et al (2022). Pengembangan Soal Uraian Berbasis Indikator Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan pada Manusia Untuk Siswa Kelas VIII SMP/Mts. Pendipa Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 128-134.
Bustami. (2018). The Implementation of Contextual Learning to Enhance Biology Students' Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 451-457.
Cahyani, S.M.R.T., et al (2022). Pengembangan Media Edukatif Monopoly pada Pembelajaran IPA di Kelas VII SMP Tema Pelestarian Lingkungan. Pendipa Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 315-321.
Kiswadi. (2016). Pembelajaran Fisika berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning dengan metode Eksperimen untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan keteampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Inkuiri, 133-143.
Ennis. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A Vision. 165-184.
Hastjarjo, D. (2019). Quasi-Experimental Design. Buletin Psikologi.
Ennis. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A Vision. 165-184.
Karim. (2015). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Sikap Siswa pada Pelajaran Matematika terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 188-195.
Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in science teaching, 28(8), 713-725.
Kusuma, A. S. (2023). Correlation in biological literacy and critical thinking skills of science students through problem-based learning model integrated by macromedia flash. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(3), 369-375.
Humairoh, S., & Yonata, B. (2022). Implementation of a guided inquiry learning model to train students' critical thinking skills on reaction rate topics. Jurnal Pijar Mipa vol. 17(2), 136-142
Riezandi, M. T. R., & Nurita, T. (2022). Analysis of critical thinking skills of junior high school students on vibration and wave materials. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(5), 630–637.
Ristina, H., Linuwih, S., & Nuswowati, M. (2019). SETS Learning Efficacy to Improve Student's Science Literacy Skills. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(2), 183–189
Hake, R.R (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics tests data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), pp. 64-74.
Sanjaya, W (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fairuz Mumtaz, Sjaifuddin Sjaifuddin, Adi Nestiadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
How to Cite
