Development of assessment for learning-oriented electronic student worksheets to improve student learning outcomes on acid-base titration material
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v18i4.5188Published:
2023-07-30Issue:
Vol. 18 No. 4 (2023): July 2023Keywords:
Electronic Student Worksheet, Assessment for Learning, Learning Outcomes, Acid-Base TitrationArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to describe the feasibility of an Electronic Student Worksheet-oriented assessment for learning to improve the learning outcomes of class XI students of SMAN 1 Menganti Gresik, Indonesia, on acid-base titration material. The feasibility of the Electronic Student Worksheet developed is reviewed based on three aspects: validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This study used a Research and Development (R&D) method development design that refers to the Borg and Gall research and development model. This research was limited to the limited trial stage. The little trial was conducted on 18 SMAN 1 Menganti Gresik students who had received acid-base titration material. The feasibility of the Electronic Student Worksheet was reviewed from the validity aspect obtained based on the assessment results by the validator, which consisted of two chemistry lecturers from FMIPA Surabaya State University and one chemistry teacher from SMAN 1 Menganti Gresik. Validation by experts related to content validity and construct validity obtained a mode of 5 with a highly valid category. Practicality in students' responses by getting a positive reaction of 97.22% with a very practical category and observation of students' activities as supporting data which obtained more excellent students' relevant activities with an average percentage at the first meeting and the second meeting of 95%. Effectiveness in terms of the results of students' cognitive learning tests which have increased with the percentage of students who get N-gain in high criteria by 11%, while the percentage of students who get N-gain in medium criteria is 83%, and the percentage of students who get N-gain in low criteria is 6%. In the second meeting, the rate of students who got N-gain in high criteria increased by 89%, while the percentage of students who got N-gain in moderate criteria was 11%.
References
Sudjana, N. (2009). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo, Cet. Ke-10.
Kemendikbud. (2022). “Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 56/M/2022 Tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum Dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran,”
Harisandy, R. (2015). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Pengendali Daya Tegangan Rendah Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (GI). Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 5(3).
Permendikbud, “Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan,” 2022. doi: 10.1290/1543-706x(2006)42[39-ab:p]2.0.co;2.
Irananda, A. G., & Rosdiana, L. (2022). Effectiveness of socio-scientific issues with mind mapping strategy on students learning outcomes on heat topic. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(5), 638-642.
Fatimah, F., & Kartikasari, R. D. (2018). Strategi belajar dan pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan keterampilan bahasa. Pena Literasi, 1(2), 108-113.
Khoiriah, K., Jalmo, T., & Abdurrahman, A. (2020). Implementasi assessment for learning berbasis higher-order thinking skills untuk menumbuhkan minat baca. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 176-183.
Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setianingsih, W., & Setyawarno, D. (2020). Pelatihan implementasi assessment of learning, assessment for learning dan assessment as learning pada pembelajaran IPA SMP di MGMP Kabupaten Magelang. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA Dan Pendidikan MIPA, 4(1), 71-78.
Ariandi, A., & Wahid, M. (2023). The evaluation of e-learning readiness as a distance learning media of the first-semester biology students. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(2), 156-162.
Amua-Sekyi, E. T. (2016). Assessment, Student Learning and Classroom Practice: A Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1-6.
Hasnawati, H., Syazali, M., & Widodo, A. (2022). Development of live worksheets assisted diagnostic assessment instruments to measure understanding of science concepts prospective elementary school teachers. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(6), 743-747.
Purnama, A., & Suparman, S. (2020). Studi pendahuluan: E-LKPD berbasis PBL untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematis peserta didik. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 131-140.
Erawati, N. K., Purwati, N. K. R., & Saraswatı, I. D. A. P. D. (2022). Pengembangan E-Modul Logıka Matematıka Dengan Heyzıne untuk Menunjang Pembelajaran dı SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 8(2), 71-80.
Dermawati, N., Suprata, S., & Muzakkir, M. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Lingkungan. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 7(1), 74-78.
Dini, P. C., & Muchlis, M. (2022). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik melalui Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Assessment for Learning pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 565-572.
Safithri, D. L., & Muchlis, M. (2022). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Assessment for Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Materi Laju Reaksi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 547-555.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet.
Riduwan. (2016). Dasar-dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Lutfi, A. (2021). Research and Development (R&D): Implikasi dalam Pendidikan Kimia. Surabaya: Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. Design Research, 153(1), 152-169.
Riduwan. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hake, R. R. (2002, August). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. In Physics education research conference (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-14).
Author Biographies
Afiqa Azra Amanina, Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Muchlis Muchlis, Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Afiqa Azra Amanina, Muchlis Muchlis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
