Analysis of the quality of students science research ideas through the implementation of research-based learning models

Authors

Muhammad Syazali , I Ketut Widiada , Mohammad Irawan Zain

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v18i6.5660

Published:

2023-11-25

Issue:

Vol. 18 No. 6 (2023): November 2023

Keywords:

Science Research Ideas, Students, PBR Models, Example Media, Templates, Paper Guidelines

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Syazali, M., Widiada, I. K., & Zain, M. I. . (2023). Analysis of the quality of students science research ideas through the implementation of research-based learning models. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(6), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v18i6.5660

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Learning that focuses on achieving product mastery is not optimal in facilitating students to create quality research ideas. In this research, we implemented MPBR to analyze the quality of science research ideas from students. To collect research ideas from students, the documentation method is used. Documents as qualitative instruments obtained through this method are assessed based on four criteria. They are suitability to the scope of scientific studies, the presence of research problems, the accuracy of the editorial title formulated from the research problem, and the urgency of the study variables. The data obtained was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative analysis that we carry out is proportion analysis. The qualitative analysis includes data reduction, visualization, and conclusion. We found that all research ideas are within the scope of scientific studies and are based on research problems. However, only some scientific research ideas have appropriate title formulations, and the variables need to be studied further through the research process. This has implications for the overall quality of research ideas. The quality of research ideas in the outstanding category is 44.06%. The proportion in the good category is 14.68%, and the remainder is in the fair category, with a ratio of 41.26%. The conclusion is that implementing the PBR model effectively trains students to create scientific research ideas based on problems they find in the surrounding environment.

References

Tim Penyusun. (2020). Dokumen Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka. Mataram: Prodi PGSD FKIP Universitas Mataram.

Tim Penyusun. (2022). Pedoman Akademik Universitas Mataram. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

Syazali, M., Wira, L., & Amrullah, Z. (2021). Assessment hasil belajar sains mahasiswa pada mata kuliah Ilmu Alamiah Dasar dimasa pandemi. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(1), 14–21.

Syazali, M., & Ilhamdi, M. L. (2022). Implementation of online learning and its impact on student science competency. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 17(2), 192–198.

Syazali, M., Rahmatih, A. N., & Nursaptini, N. (2021). Profil keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa melalui implementasi SPADA Unram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 16(1), 103–112.

Syazali, M., Widiada, I. K., & Zain, M. I. (2022). Keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa non-sains melalui pemanfaatan spada unram dan laboratorium alam. COLLASE: Journal of Elementary Education, 05(03), 579–586.

Syazali, M., & Umar, U. (2022). Catatan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Hasil Belajar Sains Dan Pembelajarannya Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Eduscience, 9(1), 92–100.

Rahmatih, A. N., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Persepsi mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar dalam menanggapi perkuliahan secara daring selama masa Covid-19. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 7(2), 143–153.

Widodo, A., Nursaptini, N., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., & Umar, U. (2020). From face-to-face learning to web base learning: How are student readiness? Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 149–160.

Syazali, M., Erfan, M., Zain Amrullah, L. W., & Hasnawati, H. (2023). Strategic Analysis of Tools/Media Combination for Distance Learning in Science Courses. Progres Pendidikan, 4(1), 38–44.

Utomo, M. N. Y., Sudaryanto, M., & Saddhono, K. (2020). Tools and strategy for distance learning to respond Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. International Information and Enginering Technology Association, 25(3), 383–390.

Syazali, M., Khair, B. N., Rahmatih, A. N., Erfan, M., & Hasnawati, H. (2022). Profile of science research idea of students of elementary school teacher program in basic natural science. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(5), 618–623.

Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., & Belzen, A. U. Z. (2020). A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130.

Forman, E. A. (2018). "The Practice Turn in Learning Theory and Science Education”. In Constructivist Education in an Age of Accountability, edited by D. W. Kritt, 97–111. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). “The Development of Scientific Thinking.” In Vol. 2 Of Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, edited by R. M. Lerner, 671 – 715. 7th ed ed. New York: Wiley.

Susiani, T. S., Salimi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018). Research Based Learning (RBL): how improve critical thinking skills? SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 1–6.

Alaçam, N., & Olgan, R. (2021). Pedagogical documentation in early childhood education: A systematic review of the literature. Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 172–191.

Tim Penyusun. (2021). Panduan penulisan skripsi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram. Mataram: FKIP Universitas Mataram.

Asipi, L. S., Rosalina, U., & Nopiyadi, D. (2022). The Analysis of Reading Habits Using Miles and Huberman Interactive Model to Empower Students’ Literacy at IPB Cirebon. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 2(3), 117–125.

Permendikbud. (2018). Permendikbud RI Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikumlum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah (No. 37). Salinan Permendikbud.

Glavin, D. P., Burton, A. S., Elsila, J. E., Aponte, J. C., Aponte, J. C., & Dworkin, J. P. (2020). The Search for Chiral Asymmetry as a Potential Biosignature in our Solar System. Chemical Reviews, 120(11), 4660–4689.

Horner, J., Kane, S. R., Marshall, J. P., Dalba, P. A., Holt, T. R., Wood, J., Maynard-Casely, H. E., Wittenmyer, R., Lykawka, P. S., Hill, M., Salmeron, R., Bailey, J., Löhne, T., Agnew, M., Carter, B. D., & Tylor, C. C. E. (2020). Solar system physics for exoplanet research. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132(1016), 1–115.

Williams, C. D., Sanborn, M. E., Defouilloy, C., Yin, Q. Z., Kita, N. T., Ebel, D. S., & Yamashita, K. (2020). Chondrules reveal large-scale outward transport of inner Solar System materials in the protoplanetary disk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(38), 23426-23435.

Zain, M. I., Radiusman, R., Syazali, M., Hasnawati, H., & Amrullah, L. W. Z. (2021). Identifikasi kesulitan mahasiswa dalam penyusunan skripsi Prodi PGSD Universitas Mataram. Tunjuk Ajar: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 73–85.

Fakhriddinovna, H. L. (2023). The role research-based learning to enhance research and academic writing skills and types of projects. Academic Research Journal, 1(1), 84–96.

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). The role research-based learning to enhance research and academic writing skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(3), 351–366.

Pincheira-Donoso, D., Harvey, L. P., Johnson, J. V., Hudson, D., Finn, C., Goodyear, L. E. B., Guirguis, J., Hyland, E. M., & Hodgson, D. J. (2023). Genome size does not influence extinction risk in the world’s amphibians. Functional Ecology, 37(1), 190–200.

Ilhamdi, M. L., Idrus, A. A. L., Santoso, D., & Hadiprayitno, G. (2020). Short Communication: Community structure and diversity of Odonata in Suranadi Natural Park, West Lombok Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 21(2), 718–723.

Hadiprayitno, G., Al Idrus, A., Mertha, I. G., Ilhamdi, M. L., & Suana, I. W. (2019). Short communication: Bird community and it’s conservation implications in Gunung Tunak Nature Park, Lombok, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 20(6), 1753–1757.

Rahayu, S. M., & Andini, A. S. (2019). Ethnobotanical Study on Medicinal Plants in Sesaot Forest, Narmada,West Lombok, Indonesia. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 11(2), 234–242.

Hansmann, R., Baur, I., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Increasing organic food consumption: An integrating model of drivers and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 1–18.

Hidayat, S. (2017). The use by local communities of plants from sesaot protected forest, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 18(1), 238–247.

Ilhamdi, M. L., Idrus, A. Al, & Santoso, D. (2018). Diversity of species and conservation priority of butterfly at Suranadi Natural Park of West Lombok, Indonesia. Biosantifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(1), 48–55.

Hapsari, R. A., Idrus, A. Al, & Ilhamdi, M. L. (2022). Diversity of Butterfly (Rhopalocera) in The River Flow Area at Taman Hutan Raya Sesaot as an Enrichment of Animal Ecology Practicum Materials. Jurnal Biologi Tropis, 22(1), 179–185.

Ilhamdi, M. L., Idrus, A. Al, Santoso, D., Hadiprayitno, G., Syazali, M., & Hariyadi, I. (2023). Abundance and diversity of butterfly in the Lombok Forest Park, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 24(2), 708–715.

Syukur, M. A., Latifah, S., & Syaputra, M. (2018). Inventarisasi keanekaragaman jenis kupu-kupu (Lepidoptera ) di Taman Wisata Alam Gunung Tunak. 1–17.

Sumiati, Idrus, A. Al, & Ilhamdi, L. (2018). Keanekaragaman kupu-kupu (Subordo Rhopalocera) di Kawasan Hutan Jeruk Manis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi, 399–404.

BKSDA NTB. (2010). Panduan Wisata Alam di Kawasan Konservasi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Mataram: BKSDA NTB.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yulianci, S., Asriyadin, Nurjumiati, Kaniawati, I., Liliawati, W., & Muliana. (2021). Preliminary analysis of module development by setting arguments through the application of scientific inquiry models to improve students’ scientific attitudes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806, 1–6.

Amnah, S., & Idris, T. (2016). Hubungan indeks prestasi kumulatif dengan keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UIR t.a 2013/2014. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 4(1), 137–144.

Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., & Tchernysheva, A. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Research in Learning Technology, 25, 1–20.

Abbott, D. (2019). Game-based learning for postgraduates: An empirical study of an educational game to teach research skills. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 80–104.

Feldon, D. F., Peugh, J., Timmerman, B. E., Maher, M. A., Hurst, M., Strickland, D., Gilmore, J. A., & Stiegelmeyer, C. (2011). Graduate students’ teaching experiences improve their methodological research skills. Science, 333(6045), 1037–1039.

Nantsou, T., Frache, G., Kapotis, E. C., Nistazakis, H. E., & Tombras, G. S. (2020, April). Learning-by-doing as an educational method of conducting experiments in electronic physics. In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 236-241). IEEE.

Department for Education. (2015). Statutory Guidance. National Curriculum in England: Science Programmes of Study.

NGGS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Syazali, Universitas Mataram

Mohammad Irawan Zain, Elementary Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Syazali, I Ketut Widiada, Mohammad Irawan Zain

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.