The Graduate’s Portrait of Competence and Technology’s Mastery in Biology Learning
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v19i2.6408Published:
2024-03-19Issue:
Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): March 2024Keywords:
Competence; Graduates; Mastery; TechnologyArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This survey research was conducted with the aim of knowing how the portrait of mastery of competence of Open University Biology Education study program graduates as biology teachers also their mastery of technology in learning. The graduates are junior high school teachers and high school teachers. The research sample was taken randomly until a sample of 94 graduates and 47 graduate users were obtained in various regions in Indonesia, such as Bogor, Central Jakarta, Pontianak, Serang, Cianjur, Pekanbaru and Bandung. The instruments used are questionnaire instruments with Likert scales and interview guidelines conducted to graduate users and graduates. Furthermore, the data is analyzed descriptively to get a portrait of mastery of competence and technology in learning. The results of the data analysis showed that the portrait of mastery of competence was categorized as very good / high, which was indicated by a value of 98.94% (graduate self-reflection) and 97.87% (assessment by graduate users). In addition, from the results of the analysis, it is also known that the portrait of mastery of technology in graduate learning is categorized as very good / high with a value of 91.49% (based on graduate self-reflection and assessment by graduate users)
References
Noor, J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian: Metodologi penelitian Skripsi. Rake Sarasin, 3(2), 1-36.
Ridley, D. R., & Boone, M. M. (2001). Alumni Loyalty: A Survey Investigation.
Wathoni, M., Alam, A., Palestina, S., Ramadi, R., Adriansyah, A. F., Ratriningrum, D. B., & Hariyani, M. (2021). Implementasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Menggunakan E-Learning. AN-NAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 39-46.
Universitas Terbuka. (2021). UT Catalog. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka
Hutasoit, L. R., Kismiati, D. A., Ratnaningsih, A., Wahyuningsih, T., Nurhasanah, N., & Nurdin, G. (2023). Profil Etika Dan Kompetensi Alumni Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi. Inteligensi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 1-10.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Febrianti, Y., Djahir, Y., & Fatimah, S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif peserta didik dengan memanfaatkan lingkungan pada mata pelajaran ekonomi di SMA Negeri 6 Palembang. Jurnal PROFIT: Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(1), 121-127.
Riduwan. (2012). Formulas and Data in Statistical Applications. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Kismiati, D. A., Hutasoit, L. R., & Ratnaningsih, A. (2023). Profil Komunikasi dan Profil Kerjasama Lulusan Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Terbuka. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains, 7(2), 394-404.
Husaini, M. (2017). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam bidang pendidikan (e-education). MIKROTIK: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika, 2(1).
Nuriyati, T., & Chanifudin, C. (2020). Pendidik Millenial di Era Globalisasi. Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(3), 361-372. [12] Parkay, Forrest W., Stanford, Beverly H. (2011). Menjadi Seorang Guru Jilid 1. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Parkay, F. W., Stanford, B. H., & Gougeon, T. D. (2010). Becoming a teacher (pp. 432-462). Pearson/Merrill.
Ismaniati, C. (2010). Penggunaan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 16.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book, 2-7..
Rosyid, A. (2016, August). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: sebuah kerangka pengetahuan bagi guru Indonesia di era MEA. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pendidikan.
Armiyati, L., & Fachrurozi, M. H. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) calon guru di Tasikmalaya. JIPSINDO (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia), 9(2), 164-176.
Amrina, D. E. (2019). Analisis Pengembangan Diri Pada Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru SMA Model Di Kota Palembang. Jurnal PROFIT: Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 6(1), 80-88.
Durdu, L., & Dag, F. (2017). Pre-service teachers' TPACK development and conceptions through a TPACK-based course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 42(11), 150-171.
Musfah, J. (2021). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan: Pendidikan di era revolusi industri 4.0. Prenada Media.
Ammade, S., Mahmud, M., Jabu, B., & Tahmir, S. (2020). TPACK model based instruction in teaching writing: An analysis on TPACK literacy. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 129-140.
Al Wahida, S. Y. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Teams Games Tournament (TGT) berbantuan Quizizz terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa (Bachelor's thesis, Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta).
Author Biographies
Leonard R. Hutasoit, Biology Education Department, Universitas Terbuka
Dyah Aniza Kismiati, Universitas Terbuka
Danang Budi Setyawan, Biology Education Department, Universitas Terbuka
Tri Wahyuningsih, Biology Education Department, Universitas Terbuka
Gusti Nurdin, Biology Education Department, Universitas Terbuka
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Leonard R. Hutasoit, Dyah Aniza Kismiati, Danang Budi Setyawan, Tri Wahyuningsih, Gusti Nurdin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
