Development of Electronic Student Worksheet Inquiry-Based with Multiple Representations of Chemistry on Reaction Rate Material to Practice Students Critical Thinking Skills
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v19i3.6628Published:
2024-05-22Issue:
Vol. 19 No. 3 (2024): May 2024Keywords:
Critical Thinking Skills; E-worksheet; Reaction RateArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research aims to describe the feasibility of Electronic Student Worksheet Inquiry with Multiple Chemical Representations to Train Students' Critical Thinking Skills on Reaction Rate Material. The feasibility of e-worksheet is reviewed in terms of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This research uses the Research and Development (R&D) method with the ADDIE model limited to the development stage. A limited trial was conducted in January 2024 on 32 students who received reaction rate material. The research results showed that the validity of the e-worksheet was declared valid based on the criteria for content validity getting mode four and construct validity getting mode 3. The practicality of e-worksheet was declared practical based on the results of the student response questionnaire, which showed a percentage of 98.4%. e-worksheet was declared effective based on the t-test results with a significance level 0.05, resulting in a t count of 68.50. Based on these results, it can be concluded that e-worksheet is suitable for use in practicing critical thinking skills on reaction rate material.
References
Mardhiyah, RH, Aldriani, SNF, Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, MR (2021). The importance of learning skills in the 21st century as a demand in human resource development. Lectura: Journal of Education, 12(1), 29-40.
Dewi, R., & Azizah, U. (2019). Developing student worksheets (LKPD) with problem-solving to train class XI students' critical thinking skills on chemical equilibrium material. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 8(3).
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2022). Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 5 of 2022 concerning Competency Standards for Primary and Secondary Education Graduates. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Basuki, BB, & Novita, D. (2019). Applying the Guided Inquiry Learning Model with a Nested Approach to Train Critical Thinking Skills for Class XI High School Students on Reaction Rate Material. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 8(2).
Susilowati, S., Sajidan, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills of State Madrasah Aliyah Students in Magetan Regency. In Proceedings of SNPS (National Science Education Seminar) (223-231).
Fisher, A. (2009). Critical Thinking An Introduction. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Wulansari, NE, & Ismono, I. (2020). Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Models Train Critical Thinking Skills In Reaction Rate Materials For Eleven Class SMAN 3 Lamongan. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 9(1), 140-147.
Yael, A., Yuridka, F., & Apriani, H. (2022). The Effect of Implementing the Class-Wide Peer Tutoring (CWPT) Model Using Joepardy Game Media on Student Learning Outcomes in Colloid Material. Dalton: Journal of Chemical Education and Chemical Sciences, 5(1), 1-5.
Decree of the Head of BSKAP No.008/H/KR/2022. (2022). About Learning Achievements in Early Childhood Education, Secondary Education Levels in the Independent Curriculum. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Alighiri, D., Drastisianti, A., & Susilaningsih, E. (2018). Students' understanding of the concept of buffer solution material in multiple representation learning. Journal of Chemical Education Innovation, 12(2).
Jannah, M., Ningsih, P., and Ratman. (2016). Analysis of Misconceptions of Class XI Students of SMA Negeri 1 Banawa Tengah on Learning Buffer Solutions with CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Chemical Academic Journal, Vol 5, No 2, Pages 85 – 90.
Nurpratami, H., Farida, I., & Helsy, I. (2015). Development of learning media on reaction rate material with multiple chemical representations. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Science Innovation and Learning, 353.
Safitri, NC, Nursaadah, E., & Wijayanti, IE (2019). Multiple analysis of students' chemical representations on the concept of reaction rate. EduChemia (Journal of Chemistry and Education), 4(1), 1-12.
Yuzan, IF, & Jahro, IS (2022). Development of Guided Inquiry-Based e-worksheet on the Subject of Chemical Bonds to Measure Students' Critical Thinking Abilities. Encyclopedia: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation Saburai, 2(01), 54-65.
Lathifah, MF, Hidayati, BN, & Zulandri. (2021). Effectiveness of Electronic LKPD as a Learning Media during the Covid-19 Pandemic for Teachers at YPI Bidayatul Hidayah Ampenan. Journal of Master of Science Education Services, 4(1), 25–30.
Suryaningsih, S., & Nurlita, R. (2021). The Importance of Innovative Electronic Student Worksheets (e-worksheet) in the 21st Century Learning Process. Indonesian Education Journal, 2(7), 1256–1268.
Khikmiyah, F. (2021). Implementation of a web live worksheet based on problem based learning in mathematics learning. Pedagogy: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1-12.
Wijiastuti, DS, & Muchlis, M. (2021). Application of the POGIL Learning Model to Reaction Rate Material to Train Students' Critical Thinking Skills. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 10(1), 48-55.
Fitriani, W., Irwandi, D., & Murniati, D. (2017). Comparison of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) and Guided Inquiry (GI) Learning Models on Students' Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Chemical Education Research (JRPK), 7(1), 76-84.
Hanson, D. (2005). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities. New York: Pacific Crest.
Khulliyah, K., & Fadlan, A. (2019). Concept Mastery and Retention Through POGIL (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) Contains Multiple Level Representation. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 1(1), 36-43.
Puteri, RPI, Mulyani, S., Khoerunnisa, F., & Wiji, W. (2021) Intertextual learning strategies with POGIL that have the potential to increase concept mastery of the influence of concentration and temperature on students' reaction rates and KPS. Journal of Chemical Education Research and Practice, 9(1).
Sugiyono. (2015). Quantitative, qualitative and R&D research methodology. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Riduwan. (2016). Basics of Statistics. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Rubio, D.M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S.S., Lee, E.S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying Content Validity: Conducting a Content Validity Study in Social Work Research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94-104.
Trianto. (2011). Innovative Constructivist Learning Models. Jakarta: Library Achievement.
Author Biographies
Eka Aprilia Rahma, Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Surabaya State University
Dian Novita, Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Surabaya State University
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eka Aprilia Rahma, Dian Novita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
