Analysis of Students Chemistry Laboratory Literacy in High School
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v19i3.6785Published:
2024-05-24Issue:
Vol. 19 No. 3 (2024): May 2024Keywords:
Chemical Literacy; Laboratory Literacy; Scientific LiteracyArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research aims to identify the laboratory literacy level of SMA/MA students in Mataram City and describe laboratory literacy in 4 aspects: context, content, competence, and attitude, in carrying out practicums in the laboratory. Laboratory literacy measurement techniques through stages pre-lab to measure the ability of the content aspect, namely identifying knowledge initial or basic concepts that support practicum, subsequent stage lab work to measure context aspects, namely problem identification, analysis objectives, and principles of analytical methods for testing scientific ideas, and attitude aspects during practicum. Stagepost lab measuring competency aspects related to data analysis from practicum results as a basis for decision making. The research data was analyzed descriptively. Research results show that value. The average student laboratory literacy in the context and attitude aspects is high, namely 78.22 and 86.8, but for the content and competency aspects, it is still low, namely 54.26 and 54.15. The conclusions of this research are as follows: (1)Ability The average laboratory literacy of SMA/MA students in the city of Mataram is a category enough, namely 67.71. (2) The ability to apply chemistry to real-life problems (Chemical Literacy) can be improved by optimizing the use of laboratories as chemistry learning centers
References
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–162.
Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2018). Chemical literacy levels of engineering students in Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39.
OECD. (2016). Results from PISA 2015: Indonesia. OECD Publishing, 1–8. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Kristyowati, R., & Purwanto, A. (2019). Pembelajaran Literasi Sains Melalui Pemanfaatan Lingkungan. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 183–191.
Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009b). Promoting Scientific Literacy Using a Sociocritical and Problem-Oriented Approach to Chemistry Teaching: Concept, Examples, Experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 131–145.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225.
Annisa, A., Farhana Haris, N., Vannes Farawasi, S., Junus, M., & Mutmainah, O. (2023). Evaluasi Pengelolaan Laboratorium Fisika di Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 4(1), 52–62.
Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Barnea, N. (2012). Laboratory activities in Israel. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 49–57.
Zuhaida, A., & Imaduddin, M. (2019). Analisis Level Literasi Laboratorium Kimia Dari Calon Guru Ipa Tahun Pertama. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(2), 2349–2359.
Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009a). Promoting Scientific Literacy Using a Sociocritical and Problem-Oriented Approach to Chemistry Teaching : Concept , Examples , Experiences. 4(3), 231–245.
Geleta, M. (2015). The Role of School Principal as Instructional Leader: The Case of Shambu Primary School. OALib, 02, 1–14.
Riswanto, R., & Dewi, N. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Laboratorium Untuk Mewujudkan pembelajaran Berkarakter. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 4, 60.
Linawati., Noer, A., & S, L. A. (2021). Analisis Level Literasi Laboratorium Kimia Peserta Didik Sekolah Menegah Kejuruan (SMK) di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian Dan Pengabdian, “Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Innovatif Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19,”1(1), 108.
Yuliati, Y. (2017). LITERASI SAINS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3.
Djaen, N., Rahayu, S., Yahmin, Y., & Muntholib, M. (2021). Chemical Literacy of First Year Students on Carbon Chemistry. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 6(1), 41–62.
Mutiah, M., & Siahaan, J. (2022). Identifikasi Tingkat Literasi Kimia-Sma Mahasiswa Progdi. Pendidikan Kimia Fkip Unram. Chemistry Education Practice, 5(2), 151–156.
Mutiah, M., Siahaan, J., Loka, I. N., Hakim, A., & Supriadi, S. (2023). Pendampingan Penguatan Basic Laboratory Skill Siswa pada Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Olimpiade Sains di SMAN 1 Mataram. Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(2), 86–90.
Subamia, I. (2012). Pelatihan Keterampilan Dasar Laboratorium (Basic Laboratory Skill) Bagi Staf Laboratorium IPA SMP Se-Kabupaten Buleleng. Undiksha, 1(2), 36–48.
Hermita, R., Suciati, S., & Rinanto, Y. (2016). Pengembangan modul berbasis bounded inquiry laboratory (lab) untuk meningkatkan literasi sains dimensi proses pada materi sistem pencernaan kelas XI. Inkuiri, 5(2), 94–107.
Author Biographies
Mutiah Mutiah, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Mataram
Eka Junaidi, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP, Universitas Mataram
Jono Irawan, Laboratorium Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP Universitas Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mutiah Mutiah, Eka Junaidi, Jono Irawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
