Analysis of Learning Style Profiles to Optimize Student Achievement

Authors

Devi Septiani , Titi Lestari , Dinar Martia Azizah

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v19i6.7613

Published:

2024-11-26

Issue:

Vol. 19 No. 6 (2024): November 2024

Keywords:

Auditorial; Kinesthetic; Learning Styles; Visual

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Septiani, D., Lestari, T., & Azizah, D. M. (2024). Analysis of Learning Style Profiles to Optimize Student Achievement . Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 19(6), 959–963. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i6.7613

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Student achievement is an indicator of learning success that indicates the extent to which a student has acquired the skills and knowledge set forth by their educational program. Understanding students' learning styles plays a significant role in determining learning success. One of the efforts to optimize student achievement is facilitating learning activities that align with students' learning styles. Students are no longer preoccupied with understanding their learning styles but are focused on deepening the material. This study aims to describe the learning style profiles of students, and students and lecturers in the learning process can follow up on the results. This study uses a survey research method with a questionnaire instrument containing 54 statements. A learning styles questionnaire prepared based on the opinion of De Poter & Hernacki is used as a data collection tool. Learning styles are identified as visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. The questionnaire was distributed to students in semesters 2, 4, 6, and 8, totaling 51 students. The data analysis technique used is a descriptive analysis of the questionnaire results. The questionnaire results show that 36% of students have visual and kinesthetic learning styles, 14% have auditory, and 14% are inconsistent. This inconsistency may suggest a balanced learning style, where students do not rely heavily on one learning mode but rather integrate multiple styles depending on the context. Therefore, the Science Education Study Program lecturers should implement a learning model that can facilitate visual and kinesthetic styles, even though the subjects taught are theoretical. Incorporating a variety of teaching methods, such as visual aids, hands-on activities, and auditory discussions, can accommodate the diverse learning preferences of students, leading to a more inclusive and effective learning environment.

References

Indrawati, A. D., Sintaasih, D. K., Wibawa, M. A., & Suryantini, N. P. S. (2016). Analisis faktor penentu prestasi belajar mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udyana. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen (JUIMA), 6(1).

S. Mona and P. Yunita, “Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan prestasi belajar Mona, S., & Yunita, P. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan prestasi belajar mahasiswa. Menara Ilmu: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Ilmiah, 15(2).

Hermawan, Y., Suherti, H., & Gumilar, R. (2020). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar (Lingkungan Keluarga, Lingkungan Kampus, Lingkungan Masyarakat) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Edukasi (Ekonomi, Pendidikan Dan Akuntansi), 8(1), 51-58.

Syah, M. (2015). Psikologi Belajar (ke 15). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Rahmawati, L., & Gumiandari, S. (2021). Identifikasi Gaya Belajar (Visual, Auditorial Dan Kinestetik) Mahasiswa Tadris Bahasa Inggris Kelas 3F IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon: Identification Of Learning Styles (Visual, Auditorial And Kinesthetic) English Tadris Students Class 3F IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 54-61.

Junierissa, M. (2015). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar terhadap Prestsi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Kopasta, 2(2), 84.

Mubarok, M., Iskandar, B. A., Zulparis, Z., & Nurdian, N. (2023). School Rules Discipline: A Narrative Study on Elementary School Students in Martapura City. Tunas: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 9(1), 75-79.

Saefiana, S., Sukmawati, F. D., Rahmawati, R., Rusnady, D. A. M., Sukatin, S., & Syaifuddin, S. (2022). Teori Pembelajaran dan Perbedaan Gaya Belajar. Mahaguru: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3 (1), 150–158.

Putri, R. A., Magdalena, I., Fauziah, A., & Azizah, F. N. (2021). Pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap pembelajaran siswa sekolah dasar. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 1(2), 157-163.

Papilaya, J. O., & Huliselan, N. (2016). Identifikasi gaya belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 15(1), 56-63.

Mike Hernacki, B. D. (2010). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan.

Manurung, M. M., & Rahmadi, R. (2017). Identifikasi faktor-faktor pembentukan karakter mahasiswa. JAS-PT (Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia), 1(1), 41-46.

M. S. Rambe and N. Yarni, “Pengaruh gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik terhadap prestasi belajar siswa SMA Dian Andalas Padang,” Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 291–296, 2019.

Rambe, M. S., & Yarni, N. (2019). Pengaruh gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik terhadap prestasi belajar siswa SMA Dian Andalas Padang. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 2(2), 291-296.

Magulod Jr, G. C. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino University students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198.

Nugroho, A. D., Zulkarnaen, R., & Ramlah, R. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 6(2), 81-98.

Amir, M. F. (2015). Proses berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar dalam memecahkan masalah berbentuk soal cerita matematika berdasarkan gaya belajar. JURNAL MATH EDUCATOR NUSANTARA: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2).

Chania, Y., Haviz, M., & Sasmita, D. (2016). Hubungan gaya belajar dengan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran biologi kelas X SMAN 2 Sungai Tarab Kabupaten Tanah Datar. Journal of Sainstek, 8(1), 77-84.

Widayanti, F. D. (2013). Pentingnya mengetahui gaya belajar siswa dalam kegiatan pembelajaran di kelas. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(1).

Syofyan, H. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap hasil Belajar IPA Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas ESA Unggul.

Prihasyto, M., Nindiasari, H., & Syamsuri, S. (2019). Pendekatan Problem Centered Learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemandirian belajar matematika ditinjau dari gaya belajar. TIRTAMATH: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Matematika, 1(1), 16-34.

Zagoto, M. M., Yarni, N., & Dakhi, O. (2019). Perbedaan individu dari gaya belajarnya serta implikasinya dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 2(2), 259-265.

Asriyanti, F. D., & Janah, L. A. (2018). Analisis gaya belajar ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa. Ilmu Pendidikan: Jurnal Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Kependidikan, 3(2), 183-187.

Wahyuni, Y. (2017). Identifikasi gaya belajar (visual, auditorial, kinestetik) mahasiswa pendidikan matematika universitas bung hatta. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2).

Damanik, J. (2015). Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Yang Bekerja: Penelitian Di STKIP Purnama Jakarta. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 8(1), 25-34.

Khoeron, I. R., Sumarna, N., & Permana, T. (2014). Pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap prestasi belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran produktif. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 1(2).

Pratiwi, D. (2014). Gaya belajar dominan pada siswa berprestasi dalam kegiatan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar di SD Negeri 2 Gombong tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal FKIP, 7(3), 1-20.

Rustiana, A., & Chalifah, N. (2012). Pengaruh lingkungan belajar dan kompetensi profesional guru terhadap prestasi belajar siswa SMA N 1 Jekulo Kudus. Dinamika Pendidikan, 7(1).

Sine, H. (2019). Peran pendidik dalam menghadapi keragaman gaya belajar murid. Pengarah: Jurnal Teologi Kristen, 1(2), 85-98.

Sukartawan, A. (2022). Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Dengan Memahami Gaya Belajar. CONS-IEDU, 2(1), 33-42.

Pujiastuti, H., Haryadi, R., & Arifin, A. M. (2020). The development of Augmented Reality-based learning media to improve students’ ability to understand mathematics concept. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 92-101.

Mkumbo, K. A., & Amani, J. (2012). Perceived university students' attributions of their academic success and failure. Asian social science, 8(7), 247.

Sarlin, M. (2018). Analisis Minat Belajar Siswa Terhadap Perubahan Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial di SDN 104 Kota Utara Kota Gorontalo. Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 1(1), 58-66.

Author Biographies

Devi Septiani, Natural Science Education Study Program, Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Titi Lestari, English Education Study Program, Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Dinar Martia Azizah, English Education Study Program, Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Devi Septiani, Titi Lestari, Dinar Martia Azizah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).