The Influence of a Community Science Technology Learning Model Based on a Scientific Approach to Improve Science Learning Outcomes
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v19i6.7779Published:
2024-11-30Issue:
Vol. 19 No. 6 (2024): November 2024Keywords:
Learning model; Science Technology Society; Scientific Approach; Science Learning OutcomesArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The science and technology model is learning to teach science and technology in the context of experience and everyday life, focusing on societal issues, whether local, regional, national, or global, with science and technology components. Meanwhile, the scientific approach is an approach to learning science process skills. It uses a scientific approach where students are directed and guided in observing, asking, trying, reasoning, and building networks to disseminate the learning results obtained. Learning outcomes are a path to mastering knowledge or skills in a subject, usually indicated by test scores or numbers given by the teacher. Learning outcomes are obtained from learning to master knowledge, usually developed and shown by numbers. This research aims to determine whether implementing a science and technology learning model based on a scientific approach affects the science learning outcomes of grade IV students at SDN Pemongkong. Researchers are implementing technology in science learning at SDN 1 Pemongkong. Still, many obstacles exist, such as internet signals and technological stupors; only some have a laptop or cellphone. Therefore, the idea that emerged in this research was the use of technology that can be accessed by all students, namely the community science technology model based on a scientific approach, which is expected to improve student learning outcomes. The method used in this research is experimentation. This type of experimental research uses Quasi-Experimental Design or quasi-experiments. The experimental plan used in this research is a Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Hypothesis testing is carried out using uji t (independent samples test). Comparison of the average learning outcomes of the experimental class and the control class for the two classes experienced an increase compared to before learning; namely, the average value of the control class at the pretest 54.82 and increased to 73.10 after learning, while the average value of the experimental class is at posttest 58.07 and rose to 74.42 on posttest. The average learning outcomes are similar between the control class and the class experiment. However, the average learning outcomes of the experimental class are still higher than those of the control class. The class that was taught used the community science and technology learning model. Namely, two students got a score of 90 in the control class, and in the conventional class, only one got a 90. By hypothesis testing, face H0 accepted that the scientific approach-based community science and technology learning model influences the learning outcomes of class IV students at SDN 1 Pemongkong. In this case, it can be interpreted that the community science and technology learning model positively impacts student learning outcomes.
References
Jamhari, M., & Nurdin, M. Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Pendekatan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (STM) di Kelas III SDN Mire. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako, 5(2), 116891.
Sufairoh, S. (2017). Pendekatan saintifik dan model pembelajaran K-13. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesional, 5(3), 116-125..
Pratiwi A. H. (2019). Artikel Penelitian Pengaruh Pendekatan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Di SD. Pontianak: Universitas Tanjung pura
Prayoga, K. (2022). Peran Teknologi Dan Tantangan Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains, 4(1), 340-344.
Habib, A., Astra, I. M., & Utomo, E. (2020). Multimedia: Media Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Proceeding Umsurabaya.
Sukmawati, W., Sari, P. M., & Yatri, I. (2022). Online Application of Science Practicum Video Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Student’s Science Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2238– 2244.
Suminar, D. (2019). Penerapan Teknologi Sebagai Media Pembelajaran pada Mata Pelajaran Sosiologi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, 2(1), 774-783.
Ardaya, D. A. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep materi IPA siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 72-83.
Ariani, C. (2023). Pembelajaran IPA di MI dalam Konsep Kurikulum Merdeka belajar. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(4), 4289-4295.
Hartoto, Tri. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (GI) Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Sejarah. Jurnal Historia, 4(2): 131-142
Dewi, V. P., Doyan, A., & Soeprianto, H. (2017). Pengaruh Model Penemuan Terbimbing terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Ditinjau dari Sikap Ilmiah pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(1).
Vandini, I. (2016). Peran kepercayaan diri terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(3).
Adnyani Ni Wyn. Rumpi, Wirya I Nym. Agustiana I Gst.A. Tri. (2014). Artikel Jurnal Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Sains Teknologi Masyarakat Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri Di Desa Kalibukbuk. Singajara : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Poedjiadi, A. (2010). Sains Teknologi Masyarakat Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Bermuatan Nilai. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurmayanti. Y. 2019. Artikel Penelitian Analisis Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Guru Sekolah Dasar Negeri 22 Pontianak Barat. Pontinak : UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA
Sani, A, R. (2015). Pembelajaran Saintifik Untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Damayanti, K. P., & Wiarta, I. W. (2022). Media Aplikasi Berbasis Pembelajaran Saintifik pada Muatan IPA SD. Mimbar Ilmu, 27(1), 44-52.
Hamdani. (2016). Tesis Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e Dipadu Strategi Kooperatif Tipe STAD Terhadap Kemampuan Metakognisi, Motivasi Berprestasi dan Sikap Peserta Didik Pada Pelajaran Biologi Kelas X Di SMAN 3 Sumbawa Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Mataram: UNRAM
Furqon, W. A., Fadiawati, N., & Kadaritna, N. (2010). Efektivitas LKS Berbasis KPS Materi Asam-basa dalam Meningkatkan KPS dan Sikap Ilmiah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 7(2), 197.
Sari, F. W. P., & Khair, B. N. (2022). Pengaruh Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Peserta Didik. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(4), 117-122.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabet.
ugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Primastuti, M. & Atun, S. (2018). Science Technology and Society (STS) Learning Approach: an Effort to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes. Jurnal of Physics, 1097, 1‒7.
Nurjanah, N., Panjaitan, R. L., & Kurnia, D. (2016). Pengaruh Model Sains Teknologi Masyarakat Terhadap Hasil Belajarsiswa Kelas V Pada Materi Peristiwa Alam. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 831-840.
Putra, S. R. (2013). Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.
Smarabawa, I. G. B. N., Arnyana, I. B., & Setiawan, I. G. A. N. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran sains teknologi masyarakat terhadap pemahaman konsep biologi dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 3(1).
Samsudin, M. (2020). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Belajar. Eduprof, 2(2), 376678.
Author Biographies
Ahmad Dedi Marzuki, Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global
Usman Usman, Pendidikan IPA, Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Dedi Marzuki, Usman Usman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).