Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edisi Maret
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMA 2 Makassar Pada Soal PISA Level 5

Authors

Andi Cahaya Rezky Andini , Andi Trisno Trisno , Abdul Rahman , Bernard Bernard

DOI:

10.29303/jm.v8i1.11682

Published:

2026-03-31

Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the mathematical literacy skills of students at Makassar State Senior High School 2 in solving Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Level 5 questions, as well as to identify the types of errors and thinking strategies that arise during the solving process. This study was motivated by the low mathematical literacy scores of Indonesian students in the PISA study (OECD, 2021), particularly in the context of highly complex questions that require reflective reasoning and non-routine problem-solving skills. This study used a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design. The research subjects consisted of 32 Grade XI students from Makassar State Senior High School 2 who were selected purposively. The research instruments were a PISA Level 5-based mathematical literacy test and interview guidelines to identify students' thinking processes. Data analysis was conducted through the stages of reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing based on the Miles and Huberman model, as well as referring to the mathematical literacy framework. Which includes the abilities to formulate, employ, and interpret. The results of the study indicate that most students are still at an intermediate level (Levels 3–4) with a predominance of conceptual and representational errors, particularly in understanding the relationships between variables and converting verbal information into mathematical models. Students with high abilities (such as Banapati Maulana) were able to demonstrate reflective and argumentative thinking processes that reflected Level 5 characteristics, while students with moderate (such as Aura Agni) and low (such as Siti Fatimah) abilities tended to stop at the procedural stage without contextual reflection. These findings confirm that improving students' mathematical literacy requires not only mastery of concepts and procedures, but also practice in reflective, argumentative, and contextual thinking through problem-based and literacy-based learning approaches.

Keywords:

mathematical literacy PISA level 5 error analysis

References

Blum, W., & Leiss, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modeling problems? In C.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling: Education, Engineering and Economics (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.

Hasibuan, S. A., Surya, E., & Sinaga, B. (2020). Development of PISA mathematical problem model on the change and relationship content. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 235–239.

Juandi, D., Tamur, M., & Wijaya, A. (2022). Students’ difficulties in solving mathematical literacy problem Level 3, 4, and 5. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 185–200.

Meryansumayeka, Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2021). Students’ strategies in solving PISA mathematical problems reviewed from problem-solving strategies. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742, 012028.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2021). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 Results (Volume IV): How Financially Smart Are Students? Paris: OECD Publishing.

Skemp, R. R. (1975). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. IndoMS Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126.

Wijaya, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks. IndoMS Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 41–58.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Author Biographies

Andi Cahaya Rezky Andini, Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Andi Trisno Trisno, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bone

Author Origin : Indonesia

Abdul Rahman, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Author Origin : Indonesia

Bernard Bernard, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Andi Cahaya Rezky Andini, Trisno, A. T., Rahman, A., & Bernard, B. (2026). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMA 2 Makassar Pada Soal PISA Level 5. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 8(1), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v8i1.11682

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.