The Effect of The Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model on Students' Chemistry Literacy on Chemical Equilibrium Material
DOI:
10.29303/cep.v9i1.10830Published:
2026-05-31Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model on students’ chemistry literacy regarding chemical equilibrium. The study employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design in the form of a pretest-posttest control group design. The research sample consisted of 11th-grade students at SMAN 1 Pujut selected through cluster random sampling, with class XI F1 serving as the control group and class XI F2 as the experimental group receiving CTL-based instruction. The instrument used was a two-tier multiple-choice chemistry literacy test covering scientific and chemical content knowledge as well as higher-order learning skills. The content validity of the instrument was tested using Aiken’s V index, yielding a value of 0.88, indicating that the instrument falls within the valid category. The reliability of the instrument was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient, yielding a value of 0.74, indicating that the instrument has a high level of reliability and is therefore suitable for use in this study. The ANCOVA test results showed that the CTL model had a significant effect on students' chemical literacy (p=0.000<0.05) with a contribution of 29.7%. In the content aspect, the experimental class obtained 81%, higher than the control class at 72.5%. In the aspect of higher-order learning abilities, the experimental class reached 46.5%, while the control class only 15%. Overall, the chemical literacy of the experimental class was in the moderate category (64%), while the control class was in the low category (43.75%). This indicates that the CTL model is effective in improving chemical literacy because contextual learning helps students understand the concept of chemical equilibrium in a more meaningful and applicable way.
Keywords:
Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Chemical Literacy Chemical EquilibriumReferences
Adriweri, E., Muwahhida, M., Nuraida, H. (2022). “Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen NonTes Kemandirian Peserta didik SDN Cadasari 1 dan SDN Cadasari 3”. Proseding Didaktis: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar. 7(1), 1278–1288.
Alvina, S., Cut, I. M. H., Mellyzar., Wildanul, K., Riski, M. & Fitri, W. (2021). Tren Penelitian Literasi Kimia Dalam Jurnal Pendidikan: Analisis Bibliometrik Dari Tahun 2014-2023). Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. 7(1), 502-513.
Amry, U. W., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi asam basa pada pembelajaran konvensional dan dual situated learning model (DSLM) (Doctoral dissertation, State University of Malang).
Anggraenia, A, Y., Sri, W. & Aidat, N. H. (2021). Profil Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Peserta didik Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Kontekstual. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey. humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,87, 49-74.
Imansari, M., Sudarmin., & Woro, S. (2018). Analisis Literasi Kimia Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Bermuatan Etnosains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia. 12(2), 2201-2211.
Khoerunnisa, P., & Aqwal, S. M. (2020). ANALISIS Model-model Pembelajaran. Fondatia, 4(1), 1-27.
Nurhasanah, E. (2023). Meningkatkan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Kimia pada Materi Sifat Koligatif Larutan Dengan Model Pembelajaran CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Jurnal Penelitian Guru FKIP Universitas Subang, 6(1), 113- 125.
Nurmilawati, S., Salamah, A., & Dewi, M. (2021). Identifikasi Pengetahuan dan Kompetensi Sains Peserta didik Berdasarkan Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) pada Materi Sistem Koloid. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia. 11(1), 35-40.
Pandu, J, L. (2020). Pengembangan Three Tier Multiple Choice Test Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Mata Kuliah Kimia Dasar Lanjut. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia. 4(1), 45-63.
Prastiwi, M.N.B., Rahmah, N., Khayati, N., Utami, D.P., Primastuti, M., dan Majid, A.N., 2017, Studi kemampuan literasi kimia peserta didik pada materi elektrokimia, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia 14 Oktober 2017, Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Safnowandi. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif dan Literasi Sains Peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1), 40-54.
Sanova, A., Afrida, A., Bakar, A., & Yuniarccih, H. R. (2021). Pendekatan etnosains melalui model Problem Based Learning terhadap kemampuan literasi kimia materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Zarah, 9(2), 105-110.
Shwartz, Y., Ben‐Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). Chemical literacy: What does this mean to scientist and school teacher. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 1557-1561.
Sinaga, M., & Saronom, S. (2020). Implementasi Pembelajaran Kontekstual untuk Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Peserta didik. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, Educenter: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(1), 33-41.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendektan Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Takim, R. R. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Ikatan Kimia Berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Melalui Metode Eksperimen. Journal of Tropical Chemistry Research and Education, 3(2), 53-62.
Viendrieana, M., Sri, Y., & Maria, U. (2021). Analisis Muatan Literasi Kimia Pada Buku Teks Kimia Sma Kelas Xi Di Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 10(2), 196-204.
Wiradharma, G., Mario, A. P., Novitalia, A. S., Irhamny, M. S., & Khaerul, A. (2021). Analisis Literasi Kimia Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit dengan Menggunakan Produk Budaya Palembang. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan. 50(2), 108-120.
Zandroto, A. V., & Sinaga, K. (2022). Analisis kemampuan literasi kimia peserta didik pada materi senyawa hidrokarbon melalui pendekatan kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2), 349-358.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Baiq Viona Olganita Sugondo, Yayuk Andayani, Ermia Hidayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Chemistry Education Practice agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Chemistry Education Practice.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
