Pengembangan Program Resitasi Berbantuan Komputer pada Materi Fluida Statis
DOI:
10.29303/jpft.v7i1.2588Published:
2021-06-15Issue:
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Januari-JuniKeywords:
Recitation Program, Mastery of Concepts, Statics FluidArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research was conducted to develop a computer-assisted recitation program on statics fluid topics The type of research used is R & D (Research and Development) by adapting the Four-D model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate) developed by Thiagarajan, but the research carried out is limited to the develop stage. The product has been validated by 2 media experts in the field of physics education. The feasibility test was carried out on 97 students who took Basic Physics I courses. Based on the results of validation by experts, the average value was 3.74 for content validation and 3.56 for product validation with valid criteria. The feasibility test obtained a proportion of 92.58% in the eligible criteria.References
Aditya, D. Y. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Resitasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 1(2).
Afwa, I. L., Sutopo, S., & Latifah, E. (2016). Deep Learning Question untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 434ââ¬â447.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi II, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,(2006). Prosedur Penelitian.
Besson, U. (2004). Studentsââ¬â¢ conceptions of fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1683ââ¬â1714.
Diyana, T. N., Sutopo, S., & Sunaryono, S. (2020). The analysis of studentââ¬â¢difficulties in mastering static fluid concept. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 11ââ¬â18.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119.
Goszewski, M., Moyer, A., Bazan, Z., & Wagner, D. J. (2013). Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513(1), 154ââ¬â157.
Heron, P. R., Loverude, M. E., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2003). Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedesââ¬â¢ principle. II. Development of research-based instructional materials. American Journal of Physics, 71(11), 1188ââ¬â1195.
Jayanti, I. B. R., Wartono, W., & Sutopo, S. (2016). Dampak Program Resitasi Terhadap Perubahan Konseptual Mahasiswa Pada Topik Hukum III Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 256ââ¬â264.
Kariotoglou, P. v, & Psillos, D. (1993). Pupilsââ¬â¢ pressure models and their implications for instruction. Research in Science & Technological Education, 11(1), 95ââ¬â108.
Kehrer, P., Kelly, K., & Heffernan, N. (2013). Does immediate feedback while doing homework improve learning? The Twenty-Sixth International FLAIRS Conference.
Loverude, M. E., Heron, P. R. L., & Kautz, C. H. (2010). Identifying and addressing student difficulties with hydrostatic pressure. American Journal of Physics, 78(1), 75ââ¬â85.
Loverude, Michael E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. (2003). Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedesââ¬â¢ principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71(11), 1178ââ¬â1187.
Pebriana, I. N., Sutopo, S., & Diantoro, M. (2018). Dampak program resitasi terhadap pemahaman konsep mahasiswa pada topik fluida dinamis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(8), 1110ââ¬â1114.
Silaban, B. (2014). Hubungan antara penguasaan konsep fisika dan kreativitas dengan kemampuan memecahkan masalah pada materi pokok listrik statis. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, 20(01), 65ââ¬â75.
Sutarja, M. C. (2016). Sutopo, & Latifah, E.(2016). Identifikasi Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Fluida Statis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IPA Pasasarjana UM, 339ââ¬â350.
Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo, S. (2017). Deskripsi Penggunaan Program Resitasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membangun Free-Body Diagrams (FBDs). JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 5(1), 52ââ¬â58.
Thacker, B., Dulli, H., Pattillo, D., & West, K. (2014). Lessons from a large-scale assessment: Results from conceptual inventories. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020104.
Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.
Wong, D., Lim, C., Munirah, S., & Foong, S. K. (2010). Student and Teacher Understanding of Buoyancy. Physics Education Research Conference.
Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Diagnosing and dealing with student misconceptions: Floating and sinking. Science scope, 31(8), 34.
Zukhruf, K. D. (2018). Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Fluida Statis pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika Universitas samudra. vol, 1, 11ââ¬â16.
Author Biographies
Askiyah Amalina, Universitas Negeri Malang
Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa, Universitas Negeri Malang
Agus Suyudi, Universitas Negeri Malang
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
