Student Involvement Model in Laboratory Maintenance According to ISO 17025

Authors

Muhsin Muhsin , Mohammad Liwa Ilhamdi , Lalu Septiadi Wirandanu

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v20i7.10053

Published:

2025-12-12

Issue:

Vol. 20 No. 7 (2025)

Keywords:

ISO 17025; Laboratory Maintenance; Student Involvement Model

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Muhsin, M., Ilhamdi, M. L., & Wirandanu, L. S. (2025). Student Involvement Model in Laboratory Maintenance According to ISO 17025. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 20(7), 1364–1371. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v20i7.10053

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Student engagement in laboratory quality systems is essential for strengthening maintenance compliance and technical competence, particularly when aligned with international standards such as ISO 17025:2017. This study aims to (1) design a student engagement model that complies with the requirements of clauses 6.2.2 and 7.6 of ISO 17025:2017 and (2) analyze the impact of its implementation on improving equipment maintenance compliance and student technical competence. The research design employs an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach, with a dominant quantitative component and qualitative support. The research subjects included 22 key informants (laboratory coordinators, laboratory heads, technicians, and students) who were selected with purposive sampling. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, in-depth interviews, FGDs, and participant observation. Quantitative data were analyzed using multiple linear regression using SPSS 25, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The results showed that the model designed based on four pillars: training, documented participation SOPs, internal audit simulations, and portfolio systems effectively transformed students from passive learners into competent contributors to the laboratory quality assurance system. The implementation of the model was proven to significantly improve maintenance compliance (mean = +1.81) and technical competence (mean = +1.59). Regression analysis confirmed that the model explained 80.2% of the variance in compliance (R² = 0.802) and 78.1% of the variance in competence (R² = 0.781), with documentation quality (β = 0.462; β = 0.423) as the strongest predictor. Qualitative findings revealed a shift in mindset from obligation to ownership as a key mechanism. This study concludes that the developed model not only aligns with ISO 17025 but also provides a strategic approach to building sustainable quality cultures in educational laboratories.

References

F. Y. Inbanathan et al., “Assessment of public health laboratory preparedness and response in WHO South-East Asia region during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned and future directions,” Lancet Reg. Health Southeast Asia, vol. 31, 2024, Art. no. 100496, doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100496.

A. Kumar, P. S. Liang, and T. Ma, “Verified uncertainty calibration,” in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 32, 2019.

B. Fakić, S. Lemeš, B. Muminović, O. Beganović, M. Hadžalić, and K. Varda, “Calibration of test and measuring equipment in pandemic conditions,” in Proc. Int. Conf. New Technol., Dev. Appl., Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2023, pp. 283–290, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-31066-9_30.

T. J. Weidner, “Planned maintenance vs unplanned maintenance and facility costs,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1176, no. 1, p. 012037, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1176/1/012037.

C. Drent, S. Kapodistria, and J. A. C. Resing, “Condition-based maintenance policies under imperfect maintenance at scheduled and unscheduled opportunities,” Queueing Syst., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 269–308, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11134-019-09627-w.

F. Fatemi, A. Dehdashti, and M. Jannati, “Implementation of chemical health, safety, and environmental risk assessment in laboratories: A case-series study,” Front. Public Health, vol. 10, Art. no. 898826, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898826.

I. N. Handayani, “Pelatihan gerakan sadar inspeksi dan pemeliharaan pencegahan peralatan di UPT Laboratorium Kesehatan Daerah Kota Tangerang,” Int. J. Community Serv. Learn., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2022, doi: 10.23887/ijcsl.v6i1.39213.

J. Fachiroh et al., “Development of a biobank from a legacy collection in Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia: Proposed approach for centralized biobank development in low-resource institutions,” Biopreserv. Biobanking, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 387–394, 2019, doi: 10.1089/bio.2018.0125.

M. A. Maher, A. M. Wofford, J. Roksa, and D. F. Feldon, “Doctoral student experiences in biological sciences laboratory rotations,” Stud. Grad. Postdoctor. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2019, doi: 10.1108/SGPE-02-2019-050.

G. Nauryzbayeva and G. Revalde, “Development of technical competence of undergraduate students,” J. Educ. Sci., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 47–53, 2019, doi: 10.26577/JES.2019.v61.i4.05.

J. A. Nirmalasari, “Teknik pemeriksaan ektoparasit pada komoditas lobster air laut di Balai Besar Karantina Hewan, Ikan dan Tumbuhan (BBKHIT) Bali,” Ph.D. dissertation, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2024.

F. R. Golra, F. Dagnat, R. Bendraou, and A. Beugnard, “Continuous process compliance using model driven engineering,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Model Data Eng., Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 42–56, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66854-3_4.

W. Wipulanusat, K. Panuwatwanich, R. A. Stewart, and J. Sunkpho, “Applying mixed methods sequential explanatory design to innovation management,” in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Eng., Project, Prod. Manag., Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 485–495, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1910-9_40.

E. Dreković, M. Radosavljević, and M. Bejtović, “Analysis of limitations of ISO standards implementation from the external stakeholders’ point of view,” Facta Univ., Ser.: Econ. Org., pp. 117–134, 2021, doi: 10.22190/FUEO210402010D.

A. Rodima et al., “ISO 17025 quality system in a university environment,” Accredit. Qual. Assur., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 369–372, 2005, doi: 10.1007/s00769-005-0011-x.

D. Zapata-García, M. Llauradó, and G. Rauret, “Experience of implementing ISO 17025 for the accreditation of a university testing laboratory,” Accredit. Qual. Assur., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 317–322, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s00769-007-0274-5.

B. Javed and A. Akhlaq, “A systematic review of exploring the multiple dimensions of data-driven culture,” Int. J. Trends Innov. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 522–536, 2024, doi: 10.48112/tibss.v2i4.953.

World Health Organization, Laboratory Quality Management System: Handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2011.

S. Pillai, J. Calvert, and E. Fox, “Practical considerations for laboratories: Implementing a holistic quality management system,” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 10, Art. no. 1040103, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1040103.

C. Clark, T. K. Chow-Hoy, R. J. Herter, and P. A. Moss, “Portfolios as sites of learning: Reconceptualizing the connections to motivation and engagement,” J. Literacy Res., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 211–241, 2001, doi: 10.1080/10862960109548110.

E. H. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership, vol. 2. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010.

Author Biographies

Muhsin Muhsin, Department of Biology Education, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Mohammad Liwa Ilhamdi, Department of Biology Education, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Lalu Septiadi Wirandanu, Department of Biology Education, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhsin Muhsin, Mohammad Liwa Ilhamdi, Lalu Septiadi Wirandanu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).