The Effectiveness of Field Learning Based on Megapodius reinwardt Ecotourism in Improving the Critical Thinking Skills of Biology Education Students
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v21i2.11760Published:
2026-04-20Downloads
Abstract
The development of critical thinking skills is a strategic agenda in biology education, particularly in preparing prospective teachers capable of integrating scientific analysis with real ecological contexts. However, learning that remains oriented towards classrooms and limited laboratories has not fully strengthened students' evaluative and argumentative abilities. Field learning based on M. reinwardt ecotourism offers a contextual approach that places students in authentic observation and analysis situations. This study aims to test the effectiveness of ecotourism-based field learning in improving the critical thinking skills (CTS) of Biology Education students. The study used a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control-group design. The experimental group implemented the Ecotourism-Based Field learning Model (EBFL) by studying the ecology and conservation of M. reinwardt in the Gunung Tunak and Kerandangan Nature Tourism Parks, while the control group followed a conventional laboratory practicum. The research instrument was a CTS test validated by experts, and the model's effectiveness was analysed using N-Gain and the Mann–Whitney test. The results showed a significant difference in CTS improvement between the experimental and control groups, as well as a substantive influence of field learning on higher-level cognitive achievement. These findings strengthen the development of an ecotourism-based contextual science learning model as a pedagogical innovation in the education of prospective biology teachers.
Keywords:
Critical Thinking; Ecotourism; Field Learning; MegapodiusReferences
UNESCO, Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2021.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
P. A. Facione, Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 2016.
D. T. Tiruneh, A. Verburgh, and J. Elen, “Effectiveness of critical thinking instruction in higher education: A systematic review,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 22, pp. 1–17, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.001.
A. Y. Kolb and D. A. Kolb, “Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education,” Exp. Learn. Teach. High. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–44, 2017, doi: 10.46787/elthe.v1i1.3362.
R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, and A. Wals, International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. London: Routledge, 2020.
M. Behrendt and T. Franklin, “A review of research on school field trips and their value in education,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 561–574, 2018.
N. M. Ardoin, A. W. Bowers, and E. Gaillard, “Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 241, p. 108224, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224.
M. C. Monroe, R. R. Plate, A. Oxarart, A. Bowers, and W. Chaves, “Identifying effective climate change education strategies,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 791–812, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.
T. Turasih, H. K. Surkanti, and R. Riandi, “Field trips (outdoor learning) untuk melatih berpikir kritis dan peduli lingkungan,” J. Pendidik. Mat. Sains, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 22–35, 2024, doi: 10.21831/jpms.v12i1.70479.
Hamna et al., “Kahani: Culturally-nuanced visual storytelling tool for non-Western cultures,” in Proc. ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conf., 2025, pp. 379–400, doi: 10.1145/3715335.3735478.
R. H. Ennis, Critical Thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.
G. Rasch, Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960.
B. D. Wright and M. H. Stone, Best Test Design. Chicago: MESA Press, 1979.
T. G. Bond and C. M. Fox, Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2015.
R. R. Hake, Analyzing Change/Gain Score. Indiana: Indiana University, 1999.
R. H. Ennis, “The nature of critical thinking: An outline of dispositions and abilities,” University of Illinois, 2011.
P. A. Facione, “Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus,” American Philosophical Association, 1990.
D. F. Halpern, Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, 5th ed. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.
P. C. Abrami et al., “Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 275–314, 2015, doi: 10.3102/0034654314551063.
C. E. Hmelo-Silver, R. G. Duncan, and C. A. Chinn, “Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155451.
A. W. Lazonder and R. Harmsen, “Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 681–718, 2016, doi: 10.3102/0034654315627366.
G. Cruz et al., “Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education,” Front. Educ., 2021.
H. Hyytinen et al., “Approaches to teaching critical thinking in higher education,” 2019.
M. Spodniaková Pfefferová and M. Plesch, “Optics experiments as a tool for developing critical thinking,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2025, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/3155/1/012017.
G. Dunne, “Beyond critical thinking to critical being,” Int. J. Educ. Res., 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.003.
M. Yamin, A. W. Jufri, A. Hakim, G. Gunawan, and A. A. Riyanto, “Effectiveness of ecotourism-based field practicum model in improving scientific literacy of prospective biology teacher students,” J. Pijar MIPA, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 564–569, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v20i3.8899.
N. Mercer and C. Howe, “Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning,” Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 12, pp. 1–5, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.09.001.
W. T. Saputra, N. Rustaman, and L. Rusyati, “Evaluating validity and reliability of scientific literacy in PISA context: Rasch model analysis,” J. Res. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 13, no. 2, 2024.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Yamin, A Wahab Jufri, Gunawan Gunawan, Ade Andriyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
How to Cite
