Effect of Brain Based Learning on Students Biology Learning Outcomes
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v21i3.11950Published:
2026-06-08Downloads
Abstract
Low biology learning outcomes are often linked to conventional teacher-centered instruction, which limits student engagement and active participation. This study was conducted to address these challenges by examining the effect of Brain-Based Learning on students’ biology achievement. The main objective was to determine whether this innovative approach could significantly improve learning outcomes compared to traditional methods. A quasi-experimental design was employed, specifically the pretest-posttest control-group design. The sample was selected using purposive sampling, resulting in two classes: an experimental class that received Brain-Based Learning treatment and a control class that continued with conventional instruction. Data collection techniques included biology achievement tests administered before and after the intervention, complemented by classroom observations to monitor the implementation process and student involvement. Data analysis was carried out using an independent sample t-test to assess the significance of differences between the two groups. The results revealed a clear and significant effect of Brain-Based Learning on students’ biology learning outcomes, as indicated by a p-value of 0.000, which is below the 0.05 threshold. The average post-test score in the experimental class was 78.45, while the control class scored only 49.32. These findings demonstrate that Brain-Based Learning is more effective than conventional methods in enhancing students’ understanding of biological concepts. In conclusion, Brain-Based Learning significantly improves biology learning outcomes and fosters more active, meaningful, and engaging learning experiences. The practical implication of this study is that teachers should consider adopting Brain-Based Learning as an innovative instructional strategy to enhance the quality of biology education. By shifting from teacher-centered to student-centered approaches, educators can create learning environments that better support achievement and long-term retention of scientific knowledge.
Keywords:
Biology Learning Outcomes Brain-Based Learning Constructivist Learning Conventional LearningReferences
[1] B. S. Sheena et al., “Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” The Lancet. Gastroenterol. & Hepatol., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 796–829, 2022, doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00124-8.
[2] V. Venkataramani et al., “Glioblastoma hijacks neuronal mechanisms for brain invasion,” Cell, vol. 185, no. 16, pp. 2899–2917, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.054.
[3] D. Bryazka et al., “Population-level risks of alcohol consumption by amount, geography, age, sex, and year: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2020,” Lancet, vol. 400, no. 10347, pp. 185–235, 2022, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00847-9.
[4] E. H. Houssein, A. Hammad, and A. A. Ali, “Human emotion recognition from EEG-based brain–computer interface using machine learning: a comprehensive review,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 12527–12557, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07292-4.
[5] D. Khurana, A. Koli, K. Khatter, and S. Singh, “Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 3713–3744, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4.
[6] J. D. Steinmetz et al., “Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Lancet Neurol., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 344–381, 2024, doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00038-3.
[7] H. Herrman et al., “Time for united action on depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission,” Lancet, vol. 399, no. 10328, pp. 957–1022, 2022, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02141-3.
[8] J. Lauer et al., “Multi-animal pose estimation, identification and tracking with DeepLabCut,” Nat. Methods, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 496–504, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01443-0.
[9] K. Rajwar, K. Deep, and S. Das, “An exhaustive review of the metaheuristic algorithms for search and optimization: taxonomy, applications, and open challenges,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 13187–13257, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10470-y.
[10] K. S. Ikuta et al., “Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” Lancet, vol. 400, no. 10369, pp. 2221–2248, 2022, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02185-7.
[11] M. Sallam, “ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 887, 2023, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.
[12] P. Banerjee, E. Kemmler, M. Dunkel, and R. Preißner, “ProTox 3.0: a webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 52, 2024, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae303.
[13] R. Sharma et al., “Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” The Lancet. Gastroenterol. & Hepatol., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 627–647, 2022, doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00044-9.
[14] T. M. Brown et al., “Recommendations for daytime, evening, and nighttime indoor light exposure to best support physiology, sleep, and wakefulness in healthy adults,” PLoS Biol., vol. 20, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001571.
[15] T. Dave, S. A. Athaluri, and S. Singh, “ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations,” Front. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, p. 1169595, 2023, doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1169595.
[16] R. C. Paolicelli et al., “Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads,” Neuron, vol. 110, no. 21, pp. 3458–3483, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020.
[17] S. Qiu et al., “Small molecule metabolites: discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets,” Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 132, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01399-3.
[18] T. M. Powell-Wiley et al., “Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease,” Circ. Res., vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 782–799, 2022, doi: 10.1161/circresaha.121.319811.
[19] J. Li, J. Chen, Y. Tang, C. Wang, B. A. Landman, and S. K. Zhou, “Transforming medical imaging with Transformers? A comparative review of key properties, current progresses, and future perspectives,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 85, p. 102762, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102762.
[20] C. N. Sofi and I. Mukhlishina, “Pengembangan Media Edu Fun Tree pada Pembelajaran Membaca Permulaan Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 15, no. 1 Februari, pp. 1–10, 2026, doi: 10.58230/27454312.3650.
[21] V. J. Clemente‐Suárez, A. I. Beltrán-Velasco, L. Redondo-Flórez, A. Martín-Rodríguez, and J. F. Tornero-Aguilera, “Global Impacts of Western Diet and Its Effects on Metabolism and Health: A Narrative Review,” Nutrients, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 2749, 2023, doi: 10.3390/nu15122749.
[22] S. Marginson and T. Dang, “Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the context of globalization,” Asia Pacific J. Educ., vol. 37, pp. 116–129, 2017, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2016.1216827.
[23] A. Mehonić and A. J. Kenyon, “Brain-inspired computing needs a master plan,” Nature, vol. 604, no. 7905, pp. 255–260, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04362-w.
[24] A. J. Ferrari et al., “Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Lancet, vol. 403, no. 10440, pp. 2133–2161, 2024, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00757-8.
[25] L. A. Risandy, S. Sholikhah, P. Z. Ferryka, and A. F. Putri, “Penerapan Model Based Learning (PBL) dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu di Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar,” J. Kaji. dan Penelit. Umum, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 95–105, 2023, doi: 10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v1i4.379.
[26] K. James, J. I. Stromin, N. Steenkamp, and M. Combrinck, “Understanding the relationships between physiological and psychosocial stress, cortisol and cognition,” Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)., vol. 14, p. 1085950, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1085950.
[27] A. S. Troy, E. C. Willroth, A. J. Shallcross, N. R. Giuliani, J. J. Gross, and I. B. Mauss, “Psychological Resilience: An Affect-Regulation Framework,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 547–576, 2022, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020122-041854.
[28] C. D. S. Júnior et al., “Discovery of antimicrobial peptides in the global microbiome with machine learning,” Cell, vol. 187, no. 14, pp. 3761–3778, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.013.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ermita Putri, Jamaluddin Jamaluddin, I Wayan Merta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
How to Cite
