Vol. 17 No. 3 (2022): May 2022
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Analysis of vocational high school student metacognitive capabilities on geometry topics during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

Ina Nurhayati , Nani Ratnaningsih , Khomsatun Nimah

DOI:

10.29303/jpm.v17i3.2499

Published:

2022-05-10

Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' metacognitive abilities in terms of metacognitive awareness inventory on geometry topics during the Covid-19 pandemic. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method. The research was conducted at Vocational High School Swadaya Karangnunggal Indonesia in the 2020/2021 academic year. The population in this study was the eleventh-grade student of office automation and governance, totaling 24 students. The questionnaire consists of 35 statement items with five indicators, namely planning (7 items), strategies for managing information (10 items), monitoring of understanding (7 items), improvement strategy (5 items), and evaluation (6 items). The stages in metacognitive ability are planning, monitoring, and evaluating stages. The results showed that students with good metacognitive abilities could carry out all metacognitive stages well, solving problems, planning, monitoring, and evaluating. Students with moderate metacognitive abilities cannot carry out all metacognitive stages in solving problems. They can carry out the planning stage, and some indicators cannot be completed properly. Then at the monitoring stage, they cannot monitor implementation activity to solve the problem because one of the subjects misunderstood the intent of the problem. The other subject experienced a calculation error when solving the problem. While at the evaluation stage, they could not complete all the indicators. Students with low metacognitive abilities cannot carry out all metacognitive stages in solving problems. They can only carry out the planning stage. Some indicators cannot be completed properly. Then they cannot carry out the monitoring and evaluation stages with all indicators.

Keywords:

metacognitive ability metacognitive awareness inventory geometry

References

Mendikbud (2020). Surat Edaran Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan Dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Coronavirus

Disease (Covid 19).

Dini, J. P. A. U. (2021). Persepsi guru dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap pelaksanaan pembelajaran daring di PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 633-640.

Asy'ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2018). Validitas instrumen karakterisasi kemampuan metakognisi mahasiswa calon guru fisika. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(1), 18-26.

Adita, E.R, & Azizah, U. (2016). Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Pada Materi Pokok Laju Reaksi di SMAN 1 Manyar Gresik Kelas XI. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 5(1), 143–151.

Ayazgök, B., & Aslan, H. (2014). The review of academic perception, level of metacognitive awareness and reflective thinking skills of science and mathematic university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 781-790.

Yuwono, C. S. M. (2014). Peningkatan Keterampilan Metakognisi Siswa dengan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Jigsaw-Modifikasi. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan, 4(1), 129171.

Nurhayati, I., & Lestari, P. (2020). Pembelajaran berbasis whatsapp dan flash game player. MAJU: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2).

Siregar, N., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2019). Sikap Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Geometri melalui Model Pace Berbantuan Geogebra. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 129-140.

Noto, M. S. (2015). Efektivitas pendekatan metakognisi terhadap penalaran matematis pada matakuliah geometri transformasi. Infinity Journal, 4(1), 22-31.

Irawan, J., Hadi, S., Zulandri, Z., Jamaluddin, J., Syukur, A., & Hadisaputra, S. (2021). Validating metacognitive awareness inventory (MAI) in chemistry learning for senior high school: A rasch model analysis. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(4), 442-448.

Aini, Q. (2019). Identifikasi Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa SD dalam Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Disposisi Matematis. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(1), 97-107.

Wahdah, N. F., Jufri, A. W., & Zulkifli, L. (2016). Jurnal Belajar Sebagai Sarana Pengembangan Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(1).

Purwati, D., & Nugroho, A. N. P. (2018). Pengembangan Media Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Google Formulir di SMA N 1 Prambanan. ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sejarah, 14(1).

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Muhali, M. (2013). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Kimia SMA. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 1(1), 1-7.

Susilawati, S., Jamaluddin, J., & Bachtiar, I. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah (PBM) berbantuan multimedia terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik kelas vii smp negeri 2 mataram ditinjau dari kemampuan akademik. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 12(2), 64-70.

Arizona, K., Abidin, Z., & Rumansyah, R. (2020). Pembelajaran online berbasis proyek salah satu solusi kegiatan belajar mengajar di tengah pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(1), 64-70.

Ismayati, I., Ratnaningsih, N., & Supratman, S. (2020). Students’ Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning: An Analysis Through Students’ Work in Solving HOTS Problem. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 21-27.

Suryaningtyas, S., & Setyaningrum, W. (2020). Analisis kemampuan metakognitif siswa SMA kelas XI program IPA dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 74-87.

Tanti, N., Widada, W., & Haji, S. (2018). Metakognisi siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran matematika berorientasi etnomatematika Rejang Lebong. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 3(1), 41-54.

Fathonah, N., Ibnu, S., & Suharti, S. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis pemecahan masalah berbantuan jurnal belajar terhadap kemampuan metakognitif. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(1).

Saputra, N. N., & Andriyani, R. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa SMA dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 7(3), 132-144.

Maswandi, F. (2016). The Analysis of Metacognitive Ability of Boarding School Students Towards the Subject on Ecosystem. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 309-316).

Pertiwi, F. N., Ahmadi, A., & Wirawan, F. (2018). Analisis tingkat kemampuan metakognitif mahasiswa melalui mai (metacognitive awareness inventory) pada eksperimen berbasis problem solving. Kodifikasia Jurnal Penelitian Islam, 12(1), 35-47.

Author Biographies

Ina Nurhayati, Education Study Program, Postgraduate Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya

Author Origin : Indonesia

Nani Ratnaningsih, Education Study Program, Postgraduate Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya

Author Origin : Indonesia

Khomsatun Nimah, Education Study Program, Postgraduate Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Nurhayati, I., Ratnaningsih, N., & Nimah, K. (2022). Analysis of vocational high school student metacognitive capabilities on geometry topics during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 17(3), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i3.2499