Analysis of vocational high school student metacognitive capabilities on geometry topics during the Covid-19 Pandemic
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i3.2499Published:
2022-05-10Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 3 (2022): May 2022Keywords:
metacognitive ability, metacognitive awareness inventory, geometryArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to analyze students' metacognitive abilities in terms of metacognitive awareness inventory on geometry topics during the Covid-19 pandemic. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method. The research was conducted at Vocational High School Swadaya Karangnunggal Indonesia in the 2020/2021 academic year. The population in this study was the eleventh-grade student of office automation and governance, totaling 24 students. The questionnaire consists of 35 statement items with five indicators, namely planning (7 items), strategies for managing information (10 items), monitoring of understanding (7 items), improvement strategy (5 items), and evaluation (6 items). The stages in metacognitive ability are planning, monitoring, and evaluating stages. The results showed that students with good metacognitive abilities could carry out all metacognitive stages well, solving problems, planning, monitoring, and evaluating. Students with moderate metacognitive abilities cannot carry out all metacognitive stages in solving problems. They can carry out the planning stage, and some indicators cannot be completed properly. Then at the monitoring stage, they cannot monitor implementation activity to solve the problem because one of the subjects misunderstood the intent of the problem. The other subject experienced a calculation error when solving the problem. While at the evaluation stage, they could not complete all the indicators. Students with low metacognitive abilities cannot carry out all metacognitive stages in solving problems. They can only carry out the planning stage. Some indicators cannot be completed properly. Then they cannot carry out the monitoring and evaluation stages with all indicators.
References
Mendikbud (2020). Surat Edaran Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan Dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Coronavirus
Disease (Covid 19).
Dini, J. P. A. U. (2021). Persepsi guru dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap pelaksanaan pembelajaran daring di PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 633-640.
Asy'ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2018). Validitas instrumen karakterisasi kemampuan metakognisi mahasiswa calon guru fisika. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(1), 18-26.
Adita, E.R, & Azizah, U. (2016). Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Pada Materi Pokok Laju Reaksi di SMAN 1 Manyar Gresik Kelas XI. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 5(1), 143–151.
Ayazgök, B., & Aslan, H. (2014). The review of academic perception, level of metacognitive awareness and reflective thinking skills of science and mathematic university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 781-790.
Yuwono, C. S. M. (2014). Peningkatan Keterampilan Metakognisi Siswa dengan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Jigsaw-Modifikasi. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan, 4(1), 129171.
Nurhayati, I., & Lestari, P. (2020). Pembelajaran berbasis whatsapp dan flash game player. MAJU: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2).
Siregar, N., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2019). Sikap Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Geometri melalui Model Pace Berbantuan Geogebra. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 129-140.
Noto, M. S. (2015). Efektivitas pendekatan metakognisi terhadap penalaran matematis pada matakuliah geometri transformasi. Infinity Journal, 4(1), 22-31.
Irawan, J., Hadi, S., Zulandri, Z., Jamaluddin, J., Syukur, A., & Hadisaputra, S. (2021). Validating metacognitive awareness inventory (MAI) in chemistry learning for senior high school: A rasch model analysis. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(4), 442-448.
Aini, Q. (2019). Identifikasi Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa SD dalam Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Disposisi Matematis. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(1), 97-107.
Wahdah, N. F., Jufri, A. W., & Zulkifli, L. (2016). Jurnal Belajar Sebagai Sarana Pengembangan Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(1).
Purwati, D., & Nugroho, A. N. P. (2018). Pengembangan Media Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Google Formulir di SMA N 1 Prambanan. ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sejarah, 14(1).
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Muhali, M. (2013). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Kimia SMA. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 1(1), 1-7.
Susilawati, S., Jamaluddin, J., & Bachtiar, I. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah (PBM) berbantuan multimedia terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik kelas vii smp negeri 2 mataram ditinjau dari kemampuan akademik. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 12(2), 64-70.
Arizona, K., Abidin, Z., & Rumansyah, R. (2020). Pembelajaran online berbasis proyek salah satu solusi kegiatan belajar mengajar di tengah pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(1), 64-70.
Ismayati, I., Ratnaningsih, N., & Supratman, S. (2020). Students’ Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning: An Analysis Through Students’ Work in Solving HOTS Problem. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 21-27.
Suryaningtyas, S., & Setyaningrum, W. (2020). Analisis kemampuan metakognitif siswa SMA kelas XI program IPA dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 74-87.
Tanti, N., Widada, W., & Haji, S. (2018). Metakognisi siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran matematika berorientasi etnomatematika Rejang Lebong. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 3(1), 41-54.
Fathonah, N., Ibnu, S., & Suharti, S. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis pemecahan masalah berbantuan jurnal belajar terhadap kemampuan metakognitif. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 11(1).
Saputra, N. N., & Andriyani, R. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa SMA dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 7(3), 132-144.
Maswandi, F. (2016). The Analysis of Metacognitive Ability of Boarding School Students Towards the Subject on Ecosystem. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 309-316).
Pertiwi, F. N., Ahmadi, A., & Wirawan, F. (2018). Analisis tingkat kemampuan metakognitif mahasiswa melalui mai (metacognitive awareness inventory) pada eksperimen berbasis problem solving. Kodifikasia Jurnal Penelitian Islam, 12(1), 35-47.
Author Biographies
Ina Nurhayati, Education Study Program, Postgraduate Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya
Nani Ratnaningsih, Education Study Program, Postgraduate Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya
Khomsatun Nimah, Education Study Program, Postgraduate Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ina Nurhayati, Nani Ratnaningsih, Khomsatun Niââ¬â¢mah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
