Analysis on why low learning outcome of mathematics and science in Elementary School at Bima District
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i1.3227Published:
2022-01-21Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): January 2022Keywords:
Learning Outcomes, Mathematics, Science, Elementary SchoolArticles
Downloads
Additional Files
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Mathematics and science are two fundamental subjects for students to master to solve problems in everyday life. The reality shows that the learning outcomes of Mathematics and Science are still quite lacking. This study aims to analyze the low learning outcomes of Mathematics and Science in elementary schoole at Bima District West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with the research subjects being upper-class students determination of research subjects by purposive sampling (based on research objectives). The instrument used to collect data is in the form of interview and documentation guidelines. The data were analyzed using the classical completeness formula to determine how many students completed and who did not complete. The results showed that the classical mastery for mathematics students at SDN Talabiu was in the deficient category (interval 1-20), with a mastery percentage of 13.51%, while the science learning outcomes for upper-class students were in the less category (interval 21-40). with a percentage of 39%. The low learning outcomes of Mathematics and Science are caused by two factors, namely students' internal factors and external factors. Internal factors related to psychology and physiology. External factors are influenced by family, school, and community conditions. The aspects of teachers and infrastructure strongly influence relationships with schools. Solutions have taken from low learning achievement caused by external factors (schools) by improving adequate infrastructure facilities and increasing teacher competencies, including educational, professional social, and personal competencies.
References
Kurniasih, D. (2018). Peningkatan minat dan hasil belajar IPA melalui model pembelajaran think pair share. Natural: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 7-11.
Sulthon, S. (2016). Pembelajaran IPA yang Efektif dan Menyenangkan bagi Siswa MI. Elementary, 4(1).
Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Putri, A. D. (2018). Identifikasi sikap implikasi sosial dari IPA, ketertarikan menambah waktu belajar IPA, dan ketertarikan berkarir dibidang IPA siswa SMP se-kabupaten Muaro Jambi. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(2).
Surahman, S., Paudi, R. I., & Tureni, D. (2015). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Pokok Bahasan Makhluk Hidup Dan Proses Kehidupan Melalui Media Gambar Kontekstual Pada Siswa Kelas II SD Alkhairaat Towera. Jurnal Kreatif Online, 3(4).
Nugraha, A. J., Suyitno, H., & Susilaningsih, E. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari keterampilan proses sains dan motivasi belajar melalui model pbl. Journal of Primary Education, 6(1), 35-43..
Alamsyah, N. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan hasil belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran IPA. JP (Jurnal Pendidikan): Teori dan Praktik, 1(1), 82-96.
Pamungkas, A., Subali, B., & Linuwih, S. (2017). Implementasi model pembelajaran IPA berbasis kearifan lokal untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 118-127..
Nugraha, A. R., Kristin, F., & Anugraheni, I. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (Pjbl) Untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Dan Hasil Belajar Ipa Pada Siswa Kelas 5 Sd. KALAM CENDEKIA PGSD KEBUMEN, 6(4.1).
Fauzia, N. L. U., & Kelana, J. B. (2021). Natural Science Problem Solving in Elementary School Students Using the Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(4), 596-603.
Kenedi, A. K., Chandra, R., & Fitria, Y. (2019, December). Problem based learning: a way to improve critical thinking ability of elementary school students on science learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1424, No. 1, p. 012037). IOP Publishing.
Khairani, S., Suyanti, R. D., & Saragi, D. (2020). The Influence of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model Collaborative and Learning Motivation Based on Studentsââ¬â¢ Critical Thinking Ability Science Subjects in Class V State Elementary School 105390 Island Image. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(3), 1581-1590.
Faridah, F., Salahudin, S., Mariamah, M., & Ajwar, M. (2021). Studentsââ¬â¢ learning creativity by the implementation of contextual-based learning in the subject of natural science. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(5), 659-663.
Mariamah, M., Ratnah, R., Katimah, H., Rahman, A., & Haris, A. (2021, June). Analysis of Studentsââ¬â¢ Perceptions of Mathematics Subjects: Case studies in Elementary Schools. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1933, No. 1, p. 012074). IOP Publishing.
Saputra, D. S., Yuliati, Y., & Rachmadtullah, R. (2019, November). Use of ladder snake media in improving student learning outcomes in mathematics learning in elementary school. In Journal of physics: conference series (Vol. 1363, No. 1, p. 012058). IOP Publishing.
Mulyanto, H., Gunarhadi, G., & Indriayu, M. (2018). The effect of problem based learning model on student mathematics learning outcomes viewed from critical thinking skills. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(2), 37-45..
Salam, M., Ibrahim, N., & Sukardjo, M. (2019). Effects of Instructional Models and Spatial Intelligence on the Mathematics Learning Outcomes after Controlling for Students' Initial Competency. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 699-716.
Sumantri, M. S., & Satriani, R. (2016). The Effect of Formative Testing and Self-Directed Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(3), 507-524.
Ardila, A., & Hartanto, S. (2017). Faktor yang mempengaruhi rendahnya hasil belajar matematika siswa mts iskandar muda batam. PYTHAGORAS: Journal of the Mathematics Education Study Program, 6(2).
M. Mariamah, M. Muslim, G. Gunawan, A. Hidayat, and Suratman, ââ¬ÅThe Effectiveness of Think Pair Share (TPS) Integrated Problem-Solving Learning of Studentsââ¬â¢ Mathematic Ability,ââ¬Â J. Phys. Conf. Ser.,1933 (1)
Kristin, F. (2016). Analisis model pembelajaran discovery learning dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Perkhasa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 90-98.
Nugroho, G. (2020). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran IPA di SDN16/II Sepunggur. Integrated Science Education Journal, 1(2), 65-69.
Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Pangestu, M. D., & Prasetya, N. A. D. (2019). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar IPA dan Literasi Sains di SMP Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi. Edufisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(02), 31-38.
N. F. Yullii, ââ¬Åa n a l iis iis k e m a m p u a n g u r u d a l a m m e n g e m b a n g k a n k e t e r a m p iil a n b e r p iik iir k r e a t iif s iis w a s e k o l a h d a s a r k e l a s v p a d a p e m b e l a j a r a n iil m u p e n g e t a h u a n a l a m,ââ¬Â J. IPA Ed. Khusus No. 2, Agustus 2011, 1(2), 98ââ¬â106
E. Satria and W. Sopandi, (2011).Applying RADEC model in science learning to promoting studentsââ¬â¢ critical thinking in elementary school. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1321, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032102.
Sari, M. (2013). Problematika pembelajaran sains ditinjau dari aspek guru. Al-Ta lim Journal, 20(1), 346-356.
A. Gecer and R. Ozel, ââ¬ÅElementary Science and Technology Teachersââ¬â¢ Views on Problems Encountered in the Instructional Process,ââ¬Â Educ. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2256ââ¬â2261, 2012.
Portanata, L., Lisa, Y., & Awang, I. S. (2017). Analisis pemanfaatan media pembelajaran IPA SD. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DASAR PERKHASA: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1), 337-348.
Azimi, A., Rusilowati, A., & Sulhadi, S. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Literasi Sains untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 2(2), 145-157.
Syawaludin, A., Gunarhadi, G., & Rintayati, P. (2019). Enhancing elementary school studentsââ¬â¢ abstract reasoning in science learning through augmented reality-based interactive multimedia. Jurnal Pendidi
Sun, K. T., Lin, Y. C., & Yu, C. J. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1411-1422.
Glynn, S. M., & Linda, K. (2015). Winter. 2004.ââ¬ÅContextual Teaching and Learning of Science in Elementary Schools.ââ¬Â. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 51-63.
Yuliati, Y. (2016). Peningkatan keterampilan proses sains siswa sekolah dasar melalui model pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 2(2), 266390.
Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2010). Effectiveness of a mobile plant learning system in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education. Computers & Education, 54(1), 47-58.
Author Biographies
Mariamah Mariamah, STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
I Wayan Suastra, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Ida Bagus Aryana, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
License
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
