Analysis of students' mathematics communication ability based on cognitive styles and mathematical knowledge
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3384Published:
2022-03-26Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 2 (2022): March 2022Keywords:
Mathematics Communication Ability, Cognitive Style, Mathematical KnowledgeArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to describe the mathematical communication skills of mathematics education students based on their cognitive styles and mathematical knowledge. This research is a qualitative approach. Data were collected by giving the MFFT test to the students to measure their cognitive styles and essay tests for determining their mathematical communication skills. Data were analyzed by comparing the scores of cognitive styles, mathematical communication, and their mathematical performances. The result shows that students with reflective cognitive styles perform better on mathematical communication than impulsive cognitive styles. Moreover, their mathematical knowledge significantly affects their abilities in solving mathematical communication tests.
References
Aminah, S., Wijaya, TT, & Yuspriyati, D. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas Viii Pada Materi Himpunan. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.29
Yuniarti, Y. (2014). Pengembangan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. EduHumaniora| Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 6(2).
Ansari, B. I. (2016). Komunikasi Matematik Strategi Berfikir dan Manajemen Belajar Konsep dan Aplikasi. Banda Aceh: PeNA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2000. Principle and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM
Azmi, S., Hayati, L., Hapipi, H., & Triutami, TW (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(2), 163–169.
Lestari, W. (2017). Pengaruh Kemampuan Awal Matematika dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Analisa, 3(1), 76–84
Russefendi. 2004. Pengajaran Matematika Modern. Bandung: Tarsito.
Ridding, Richard J. & Rayner, Stephen G. (2000). International Perspectives on Individual Differences. Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corporation
Susanto, H. A. (2015). Pemahaman Pemecahan Masalah Berdasar Gaya Kognitif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Michel, R. R., & Riedel, S. L. (1988). Effects of Expertise and Cognitive Style on Information Use in Tactical Decision Making. Alexandria: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (No. 806). Technical Report.
Minrohmatillah, N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif Impulsif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika (JP2M) 4 (2) (2018) 68 - 75
Warli, W. (2013). Kreativitas Siswa SMP Yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif Atau Impulsif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 20(2), 190–201.
Purwati, Heni, Wuri, & Endah, D. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Dengan Gaya Belajar Kompetitif. Jurnal Derivat, 4(2), 17–23.
Qomariyah, N., & Setianingsih, R. (2020). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 4(1), 22–33.
Achir, YS, Usodo, B., & Retiawan, R. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (Spldv) Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif. Paedagogia, 20(1), 78
Annisa, S., & Siswanto, RD (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Dan Gender. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika, 14 (2), 146–167.
Soekamto, T., & Winataputra, U. S. (1997). Teori belajar dan model-model pembelajaran. Jakarta: Dikti.
Dahar, R. W. (1989). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga. p. 110–112
Shodikin, A. (2015). Interaksi kemampuan awal matematis siswa dan pembelajaran dengan strategi abduktif-deduktif terhadap peningkatan kemampuan penalaran dan disposisi matematis siswa. Inspiramatika, 1(1), 61–72.
Kendeou, P., & Van Den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577.
Qonaah, A., Pujiastuti, H., & Fatah, A. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematis siswa. Jurnal Edumatica, 9(1), 9-14.
Gunada, I. W., & Harjono, A. (2015). Analisis Pemetaan Penelitian Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Fkip Universitas Mataram. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 10(1).
Sugiarto, E., Hartono, H., & Subandowo, S. (2020). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Pratikum Melalui Pendekatan Discovery Berbasis Inkuiri dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(2), 182-187.
Author Biographies
Syahrul Azmi, Mathematics Education Department, FKIP Universitas Mataram
Baidowi Baidowi, Mathematics Education Department, FKIP University of Mataram
Nurul Hikmah, Mathematics Education Department, FKIP University of Mataram
Ratna Yulis Tyaningsih, Mathematics Education Department, FKIP University of Mataram
Eka Kurniawan, Mathematics Education Department, FKIP University of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Syahrul Azmi, Baidowi Baidowi, Nurul Hikmah, Ratna Yulis Tyaningsih, Eka Kurniawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).