Analysis of mathematics problem-solving ability on plane figure subject based on van hieles theory at Junior High School
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i4.3413Published:
2022-07-31Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): July 2022Keywords:
Problem-Solving, Plane Figure Subject, Van Hiele TheoryArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to describe the ability to solve mathematical problems in Plane Figure Subject based on van Hiele's theory in class VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 Mataram in the academic year 2021/2022. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative, which produces data in the form of written or spoken words from people and observed behavior. The subjects in this study were students in class VIII-E at SMP Negeri 1 Mataram, totaling 36 students. The method of taking the subject in this study used purposive sampling, which was selected based on the objectives to be achieved. The data collection methods used are the van Hiele test and the flat wake problem-solving ability test, interviews, and documentation. The thinking level of students in taking the van Hiele test was: 20 students at level 0 (visualization) with a percentage of 55.56%, 13 students at level 1 (analysis) with a percentage of 36.11%, and 3 students at level 2 (informal deduction) with a percentage of 8.33%. Furthermore, students at each level of van Hiele's thinking were taken as representatives of each of the 2 subjects to carry out a problem-solving ability test. Based on the results of the research on the problem-solving abilities of students based on the Polya problem-solving stage, students who are at level 0 can understand the problem but have not been able to carry out the other Polya-solving stages. Students at level 1 can understand the problem and develop a settlement plan but have not been able to carry out the other stages of Polya solving. Students at the level can understand the problem, develop a settlement plan, and carry out a settlement plan but have not been able to re-examine. It shows that the higher the van Hiele thinking level of the students, the better their problem-solving abilities will be.
References
Sulistiani, E., & Masrukan, M. (2017, February). Pentingnya berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk menghadapi tantangan MEA. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (pp. 605-612).
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics. London: Pearson Education UK.
Romika, R., & Amalia, Y. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar dengan Teori Van Hiele. Bina Gogik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(2).
Polya, G. (1985). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. In The Mathematical Gazette. Princeton University Press.
Asih, N. (2019). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pemeblajaran Means End Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 8(3), 435-446.
Petrus, Z., Karmila, K., & Riady, A. (2017). Deskripsi kemampuan geometri siswa SMP berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1).
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi, 562–569.
Siagian, P.P.G., Sinaga, B., & Mulyono (2019). Analysis of Difficulty of student’s Geometry on Van Hiele’s Thinking Theory. Internasional Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education. 3(2), 162-176.
Abdussakir. (2009). Pembelajaran Geometri Sesuai Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Madrasah. 2(1), 1-14.
Sarjiman, P. (2006) Peningkatan Pemahaman Rumus Geometri Melalui Pendekatan Realistik Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 0(1), 73-92.
Firnanda, V., & Pratama, F. W. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Segitiga Berdasarkan Teori Van Hielle. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 9(3), 487–498.
Muhassanah, N., Sujadi, I., & Riyadi. (2014). Analisis Keterampilan Geometri Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tingkat Berpikir Van Hiele. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika. 2(1), 54–66.
Sholihah, S. Z., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalan Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 6(2), 287-298.
Patahuddin, S. M., Suwarsono, S., & Johar, R. (2018). Indonesia: History and perspective on mathematics education. Mathematics and its teaching in the Asia-Pacific region, 191-230.
Pebruariska, A., & Fachrudin, A. D. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas VII pada Materi Segiempat ditinjau dari Tingkat Berpikir Geometri Van Hiele. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 21-28.
Cruz, R. F., & Tantia, J. F. (2017). Reading and understanding qualitative research. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 39(1), 79-92.
Prayitno, Sudi. (2019). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Lombok: Duta Pustaka Ilmu
Eisner, E. W. (1997). The new frontier in qualitative research methodology. Qualitative inquiry, 3(3), 259-273.
Azwar, S. (2013). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sofiyati, E. (2022). Critical Thinking Process Analysis Based on Van Hiele's Theory Through the Discovery Learning Model. Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 44-59.
Author Biographies
Deanti Ramadhania, Mathematics Education Departement, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, University of Mataram
Sudi Prayitno, Mathematics Education Departement, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, University of Mataram
Sri Subarinah, Mathematics Education Departement, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, University of Mataram
Arjudin Arjudin, Mathematics Education Departement, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, University of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Deanti Ramadhania, Sudi Prayitno, Sri Subarinah, Arjudin Arjudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
