Student team achievement division model (STAD) in increasing human digestive system learning outcomes
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i3.3540Published:
2022-05-31Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 3 (2022): May 2022Keywords:
STAD, Learning Outcomes, Human Digestive SystemArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to implement the STAD learning model to improve student learning outcomes and student responses. The STAD model was applied to 29 Semen Gresik Junior High School students. The research design used was one group pretest-posttest design with data collection methods using a test, questionnaire, and observation methods. The research instruments were learning sheets, pretest questions, and student response questionnaire sheets. The study found an increase in learning outcomes through the calculation of N-Gain with an average value of 0.85 in the high category. Student responses in learning activities using the STAD method showed very positive results, with an average percentage of 92%. The application of the STAD learning method was very good at meetings I and II. Based on the research data analysis, it can be concluded that there is an increase in learning outcomes through the STAD type cooperative learning model in the material of the human digestive system.
References
Biologi Model STAD Dan TGT Ditinjau Dari Keingintahuan Dan Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1).
As, M. Y. (2021). Influence of STAD cooperative learning model to improving physics learning process and learning outcomes. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(4), 519-524.
Kristin, F. (2016). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD ditinjau dari Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas 4 SD. Jurnal Scholaria, 6(2), 74–79.
Anindyarini, A. (2021). The Effect of Folktale-Based Comics on Traditional Ecological Knowledge Literacy about Non-rice Food Security. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3).
Oddone, K., Hughes, H., & Lupton, M. (2019). Teachers as connected professionals: A model to support professional learning through personal learning networks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3).
Widayanti, E., & Slameto, S. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Teams Games Tournament Berbantuan Permainan Dadu Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 6(3), 182-195.
Slavin, R . E. 2008. Copperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media
Nurayani, N., Khairuddin, K., & Raksun, A. (2020). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar IPA (Biologi) Siswa Pada Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Games Tournament (TGT) dengan Tipe Numbered Head Together (NHT). Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(4), 346-350.
Rochmatin dan Ganes Gunansyah (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPS Kelas IV. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2 (3), 1-8
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet.
Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Rineka Cipta
Ningsyih, S., Hairunisa, H., Fatimah, N., & Ulfa, M. (2022). The effect of the team games tournament model with the traditional game media to train critical thinking ability in elementary school students. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(1), 62-66.
Hake, R.R. 1998. Interactive engagement v.s traditional methods: six- thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics. Vol. 66. No.1.
Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2015). Can cooperative learning achieve Muldayanti, N, D. (2013). Pembelajaran the four learning outcomes of physical education? A review of literature. Quest, 67(1), 56-72.
Sulisworo, D., & Suryani, F. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning, motivation and information technology literacy to achievement. International Journal of Learning & Development, 4(2), 58-64.
Utami, Santi. (2015). Peningkatan hasil belajar melalui pembelajaran kooperatif tipe stad pada pembelajaran dasar sinyal video. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan. 22(4): 424- 431.
Suryosubroto. (2002). Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Tennant, M. (2019). Psychology and adult learning: The role of theory in informing practice. Routledge.
Cacciamani, S. (2017). Experiential learning and knowledge building in higher education: An application of the progressive design method. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1).
Yang, K. T., Wang, T. H., & Chiu, C. M. H. (2015). Study the effectiveness of technology-enhanced interactive teaching environment on student learning of junior high school biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 263-275.
Author Biographies
Anggita Dwi Yusvi Putri, Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Elok Sudibyo, Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Anggita Dwi Yusvi Putri, Elok Sudibyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
