Examining student responses of PhET simulations after virtual laboratory practices
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v17i4.3624Published:
2022-07-31Issue:
Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): July 2022Keywords:
Distance Learning, PhET Simulations, Virtual Laboratory Practice, Student ResponseArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aims to describe students' responses to implementing PhET Simulations after joining a virtual laboratory practice. This study employed a survey method. The samples of this study included 80 students in eighth grade, and the data collection was conducted using the questionnaire of students' responses to the use of PhET Simulation. The data of students' responses were displayed in percentages and grouped into five categories: very good, good, satisfying, sufficient, and insufficient. The study results showed that students' interest in PhET Simulations was categorized as good. Group learning feasibility using PhET Simulations was categorized as satisfying, the novelty of PhET Simulations for students was categorized as good, the effectiveness of PhET Simulations was categorized as good, and new information gained from PhET Simulations was categorized as good. The average of students' responses was categorized as good. The results revealed that students respond well to the implementation of PhET Simulations in virtual laboratory practice activities, which should be implemented in the science learning activity during Covid-19 pandemics.
References
Pusdiklat Kemdikbud, “Surat edaran mendikbud no 4 tahun 2020 tentang pelaksanaan kebijakan dalam masa darurat penyebaran Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19),”Pusdiklat.kemdikbud.go.id, 2020.
Campillo-Ferrer, J. M., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on students’ self-reported motivation and learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00860-4
Gustiani, S. (2020). Students’ motivation in online learning during Covid-19 pandemic era : A case study. Holistics Journal, 12(2), 23–40. https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/holistic/article/view/3029
Drozdikova-Zaripova, A. R., Valeeva, R. A., & Latypov, N. R. (2021). The impact of isolation measures during Covid-19 pandemic on Russian students’ motivation for learning. Education Sciences, 11(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110722
Nababan, G., Purba, J. E. L., & Aji, K. A. (2021). Mengukur keterlibatan siswa dalam pembelajaran online siswa kelas VII di sekolah ABC pada pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (Jumadika), 3(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol3iss2year2021page100-109
Yunita, N., & Nurita, T. (2021). Analisis keterampilan proses sains siswa pada pembelajaran daring. Pensa E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(3), 378–385. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/41088
Emda, A. (2014). Laboratorium sebagai sarana pembelajaran kimia dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan dan keterampilan kerja ilmiah. Lantanida Journal, 2(2), 218–229. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/lantanida/article/view/1409
Saraswati, N. L. P. A., & Mertayasa, I. N. E. (2020). Pembelajaran praktikum kimia pada masa pandemi Covid-19 : Qualitative content analysis kecenderungan pemanfaatan teknologi daring. Wahana Matematika dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, dan Pembelajaran., 14(2), 144–161. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/28297
Lanzilotti, R., Montinaro, F., & Ardito, C. (2009). Influence of students’ motivation on their experience with e-learning systems: An experimental study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5616 LNCS(PART 3), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_7
Harahap, I. P. P., & Novita, D. (2020). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen tes diagnostik Four-Tier Multiple Choice ( 4TMC ) pada konsep laju reaksi. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 9(2), 222–227. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/journal-of-chemical-education/article/view/32994
Sahertian, D. P., & Hidayati, S. N. (2022). Analisis keterampilan pemecahan masalah siswa berbantuan artikel socio-scientific issue pada materi energi alternatif. Pensa: E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 1-7. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/41128
Guntara, Y. (2020). Normalized gain ukuran keefektifan treatment. March. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27603.40482
Mystakidis, S. (2021). Deep meaningful learning. Encyclopedia. 1(3), 988–997. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/1/3/75/htm
Malmia, W., Makatita, S. H., Lisaholit, S., Azwan, A., Magfirah, I., Tinggapi, H., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). Problem-based learning as an effort to improve student learning outcomes. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 1140–1143. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3457426
Siagian, G. (2021). Implementasi pembelajaran berbasis praktikum terhadap hasil belajar siswa dalam materi arthropoda di SMP. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5802–5809. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1498
Anisa, V. M., & Astriani, D. (2022). Implementation of PhET simulation with discovery learning model to improve understanding of dynamic electricity concepts. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i3.3438
Waseem, T., & Aslam, F. (2020). Educational learning theories & their implications in modern instructional designs. Health Professions Educator Journal, 3(2), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v3i2.9
Van Wart, M., Ni, A., Medina, P., Canelon, J., Kordrostami, M., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Integrating students’ perspectives about online learning: A hierarchy of factors. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8
Saputra, R., Susilawati, S., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Simulasi Phet (Physics Education Technology) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i2.1459
Yasir, M., Suarman, & Gusnardi. (2017). Analisis tingkat kepuasan siswa dan motivasi dalam pembelajaran kelompok (cooperative learning) dan kaitannya dengan hasil belajar akuntansi di SMK Labor binaan FKIP Unri Pekanbaru. Pekbis jurnal, 9(2), 77-90. http://ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JPEB/article/view/4418/4228
Yuafi, M. E. D., & Endryansyah. (2015) pengaruh penerapan media pembelajaran PhET (Physics Education Technology) simulation terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas X TITL pada standar kompetensi mengaplikasikan rangkaian listrik di SMKN 7 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 4(2), 407-415. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/17/article/view/11424/4433
Destyana, V. A., & Surjanti, J. (2021). Efektivitas penggunaan Google Classroom dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran ekonomi. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 1000-1009. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.507
Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 10(4), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273
Prasetya, I. E., Yusuf, M., & Buhungo, T. J. (2022). Description of students learning motivation towards the use of phet simulation in physics online learning in terms of self-efficacy and anxiety levels. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i1.3218
Author Biographies
Nurul Azzubairiyah, Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Erman Erman, Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Enny Susiyawati, Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nurul Azzubairiyah, Erman Erman, Enny Susiyawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
