The description of students learning difficulties in reaction rate materials
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v18i5.5577Published:
2023-09-27Issue:
Vol. 18 No. 5 (2023): September 2023Keywords:
Learning Difficulties, Reaction Rate Material, Diagnostic Test, Two-TierArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Reaction Rate is material that high school students study in class XI MIPA in odd semesters. In this material, as much as 77.64% of SMAN 16 Padang class XI MIPA students have yet to achieve the minimum criteria set. It indicates that students have learning difficulties. Learning difficulties are failures in achieving learning goals characterized by low learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the percentage of students who experience learning difficulties for each indicator on the material reaction rate and determine the factors that cause learning difficulties experienced by students in terms of learning methods. This research is a type of descriptive research. The sample for this research was students in class XI MIPA 3 at SMAN 16 Padang in the 2022/2023 academic year, which consisted of 36 people. The research instruments used were two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic tests, questionnaires, and interviews. The data analysis used is descriptive, namely analyzing and providing an understanding of the data in the form of numbers so that an overview can be given in an orderly, concise, and clear manner. The results of this study stated that students of SMAN 16 Padang experienced learning difficulties in tar material with a high category. The highest difficulty level is found in the 3rd indicator (Explaining the effect of surface area on the rate of reaction), which is equal to 83.33%. Learning difficulties experienced by students are caused by ineffective learning methods, such as making study schedules and carrying them out, reading and taking notes, repeating material, concentrating, and doing assignments.
References
Suharto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian Autenti (penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013) Suatu Pendekatan Praktis Disertai dengan contoh. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers
Zakiyah, I. S., & Subandi. (2018). Analisis Dampak Kesulitan Peserta didik pada Materi Stoikiometri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Struktur atom. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 3(1), 119–134.
Runtukahu , & Kandou. (2014). Pembelajaran Matematika Dasar Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Yogyakarta : Ar-ruz Media
Abdurrahman, M. (2009). Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sakti, L. E. (2018). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Sma Pada Materi Stoikiometri (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Padang).
Nana, S. S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Cet. III.
Iswara, W. H., Muntari, M., & Rahmawati, R. (2021). Identifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Narmada Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Chemistry Education Practice, 4(3), 242-249.
Firdaus, M., Rusman., & zulfadli. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Dengan Menggunakan Four-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic. Jurnal Chimica Didactica Acta, 9(2), 51-61.
Izza, R. I., Nurhamidah., & Elvinawati. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan CRI (Ceartainty of Response Index) Pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa. ALOTROP, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(1), 55-63.
Nofitasari, I., & Sihombing, Y. (2017). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik Dan Faktor Penyebabnya dalam Memahami Materi Listrik Dinamis Kelas X Sma Negeri 2 Bengkayang. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 7(1), 44.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Salirawati, Das. (2010). Pengembangan Model Instrumen Pendeteksi Miskonsepsi Kimia Pada Peserta Didik SMA. Yogyakarta : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono, (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Kırık, Ö. T., & Boz, Y. (2012). Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 221-236.
Palisoa, N. (2008). Strategi Advance Organizer dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Jendela Pengetahuan. 7 (1): 6-7
Slameto. (2010). Belajar & Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Adhani, H., dkk. (2022). Gaya Belajar Siswa : Apakah Ada Hubungannya dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa?. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(1), 62-71
Dalyono. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Author Biographies
Della Rezkyta Amanda, Chemistry Education Departement, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Padang
Fajriah Azra, Chemistry Education Departement, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Padang
Jurusan Kimia, Universitas Negeri Padang (Akreditasi A)
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Della Rezkyta Amanda, Fajriah Azra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
