Description of student learning difficulties in the acid-base material
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v18i5.5583Published:
2023-09-25Issue:
Vol. 18 No. 5 (2023): September 2023Keywords:
Learning Difficulties, Acid-base, Diagnostic Test, Two-Tier, QuestionnairesArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Acid-base material is material that class XI IPA students study in the even semester. In this material, 81.38% of class XI IPA students at SMAN 16 Padang have yet to achieve the minimum criteria set. It indicates that students have learning difficulties. Learning difficulties are failures to attain learning goals characterized by low learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the percentage of students who experience learning difficulties for each indicator on acid-base material and determine the factors that cause learning difficulties experienced by students in terms of learning methods. Its research is a type of descriptive research. The sample for this research was students in class XI IPA 2 at SMAN 16 Padang in the 2022/2023 academic year, which consisted of 34 people. The research instrument was a diagnostic test with two-tier multiple-choice questionnaires and interviews. The data analysis used is descriptive, namely analyzing and then providing an understanding of the data in the form of numbers so that an overview can be given in an orderly, concise, and clear manner. The results of this study stated that students of SMAN 16 Padang had learning difficulties in acid-base material, with a percentage of 66.65% in the high category. The highest difficulty level is found in the first indicator (Analyzing the properties of the solution based on the acid-base theory according to Arrhenius, Bronsted-Lowry, and Lewis) of 72.88%. Ineffective learning methods cause learning difficulties experienced by students. Effective ways of learning are making study schedules and carrying them out, reading and taking notes, repeating subject matter, concentrating, and doing assignments.
References
Suharto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Juliati, M., Salmiah, S., & Novita, Y. (2022). Pengaruh Lingkungan Keluarga terhadap Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi di Sekolah MAN 4 Pekanbaru Kecamatan Rumbai Kota Pekanbaru. Eklektik: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 75-85.
Gaol, P. L. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 179-189.
Irham, M.,& Wiyani, N. A. (2016). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori Dan Aplikasi Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Muderawan, I, W., I, G & Muthia, Z. N. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 3(1), 17-23.
Suryabrata, S. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hamalik, O. (2002). Psikologi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Tarsito.
Dalyono. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Febriani, P. S., & Alit, S. (2017). Dampak Cara Belajar dan Fasilitas Belajar dalam Meningkatan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Manejerial, 2(2), 163-172.
Zakiyah, I. S., & Subandi. (2018). Analisis Dampak Kesulitan Peserta didik pada Materi Stoikiometri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Struktur atom. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 3(1), 119–134.
Andriani, M., Muhali., & Citra, A. D. (2019). Pengebangan Modul Kimia Berbasis Kontekstual untuk Membangun Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Asam Basa. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 7(1), 25-34.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Utami, I.,Bakti, M., & Sri, Y. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Asam Basa dengan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Dilengkapi Interview. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 9(1), 89-97.
Sukmadinata, Nana, S. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Firdaus, M., Rusman., & Zulfadli. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga dengan Menggunakan Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Chemica Didactica Acta, 9(2), 51-61.
Izza, R. I., Nurhamidah., & Elvinawati. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan CRI (Certainty Of Response Index) Pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa ALOTROP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(1), 55-63
Nofitasari, I., & Sihombing, Y. (2017). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik Dan Faktor Penyebabnya dalam Memahami Materi Listrik Dinamis Kelas X Sma Negeri 2 Bengkayang. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 7(1), 44-53.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Salirawati, D. (2010). Pengembangan Model Instrumen Pendeteksi Miskonsepsi Kimia Pada Peserta Didik SMA. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono, (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar & Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Adhani, H., Dkk. (2022). Gaya Belajar Siswa: Apakah Ada Hubungannya dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa?. Journal Of Classroom Action Research, 4(1), 62-71.
Sukmawati, A., Ahmad, H., & Ida, E. (2022). Hubungan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa. Journal Of Classroom Action Research, 4(1), 125-129.
Author Biographies
Annisa Annisa, Chemistry Education Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Padang
Fajriah Azra, Chemistry Education Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Padang
Jurusan Kimia, Universitas Negeri Padang (Akreditasi A)
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Annisa Annisa, Fajriah Azra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
